Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 months ago
Transcript
00:02In a landmark verdict, a New Mexico jury has found Meta knowingly harmed children's mental health
00:09and failed to act when it knew about sexual exploitation on its platforms.
00:14Did Meta violate the Unfair Practices Act by engaging in an unconscionable trade practice?
00:20The jury's answer is yes.
00:23Did Meta act willfully by engaging in an unconscionable trade practice?
00:28The jury's answer is yes.
00:31After a nearly seven-week trial, jurors sided with New Mexico prosecutors who argued that Meta,
00:36which of course used to be Facebook, put profits ahead of safety.
00:40The state says the company made false and misleading statements and designed its platforms to be addictive,
00:47exposing young users to harmful content tied to eating disorders, self-harm, and sexual exploitation.
00:54Prosecutors also argued those design choices enabled child sexual exploitation.
01:00Meta must now pay $375 million in civil penalties to the state.
01:05This is historic. It's the first of its kind in the entire country.
01:09And I'm really excited that we can be an example for the rest of this country and frankly for people
01:15all around the world
01:16that are concerned about big tech and its impact on our kids.
01:20Meta says it will appeal, writing, quote, we respectfully disagree with the verdict.
01:25The company adds it will continue to defend its record on protecting teens online.
01:30A second phase of the trial is set for May when a judge will decide whether Meta created a public
01:35nuisance
01:35and should fund programs to address the harm.
01:40A second phase of the trial is set for May when a judge will decide whether or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:40judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a judge or not be a
01:41judge
Comments

Recommended