Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpLEtz3H0jSfEneSdf1YKnw/join
What would happen if the United States tried to take Greenland by force? Could NATO survive such a move, or would the alliance collapse overnight? And if NATO falls, would Vladimir Putin become the ultimate winner? This video explores the escalating Greenland crisis, European reactions, and the high-stakes strategic implications for NATO, the Arctic, and global security. Hear statements from Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Canada, the EU, and other leaders emphasizing sovereignty, territorial integrity, and collective defense.
We break down the potential consequences of a U.S. military intervention on Greenland, why NATO could be jeopardized, and how Moscow and Beijing are strategically positioned to benefit.
00:00What would happen if the United States tried to take Greenland by force?
00:05Would NATO survive it?
00:07Or would the world's most powerful military alliance collapse overnight?
00:11And if NATO collapses, would that make Vladimir Putin the biggest winner?
00:17Tell me what you think in the comments.
00:30And just to be clear, we are talking about military action.
00:34Now, President Trump's been talking about a deal to ensure Russia and China don't get Greenland.
00:40But he's also said something else that's very interesting.
00:44But one way or the other, we're going to have Greenland.
00:46So if the deal doesn't work, one way or the other, we're going to have Greenland.
00:52No wonder then that Europe is talking like US military action in Greenland is a real and present danger.
00:59A direct threat to NATO's foundations.
01:02I'm going to talk through a few of the statements that have come out of Europe and NATO and watch this carefully.
01:08Listen to the words that get repeated over and over again.
01:12That's where the real message is.
01:14Denmark's Prime Minister warned that if the United States were ever to attack another NATO country militarily,
01:20everything stops.
01:22And that includes NATO itself.
01:24She said,
01:24Denmark was ready to defend our values wherever it is necessary, including in the Arctic.
01:31France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark all issued a joint statement saying
01:37Greenland belongs to its people alone, not to Washington.
01:41And that Arctic security must be achieved collectively through NATO, not through coercion.
01:48The European Council president said nothing about Denmark or Greenland can be decided without Denmark and Greenland.
01:56EU's foreign policy chief called Trump's remarks extremely concerning and confirmed that European governments are already discussing
02:04what their response would be if the threat becomes real.
02:08The Polish Prime Minister, he said he's deeply worried that the Greenland issue is creating dangerous political and ideological tensions inside NATO itself.
02:19The Italian Prime Minister warned that any American military move would have grave consequences for the alliance and benefit no one,
02:27including the United States.
02:28Canada's Prime Minister said Greenland's future belongs exclusively to Greenlanders and to Denmark
02:35and that Arctic security must be handled collectively, not unilaterally.
02:41The Spanish Prime Minister said the territorial integrity of Denmark is non-negotiable
02:46and that threats to a NATO ally simply cannot be accepted.
02:51Germany's foreign minister said the fate of Greenland will be decided only by its people and Denmark
02:57and that NATO must remain united around the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.
03:04You're hearing it, right?
03:06The repeated insistence on words like collectively, united, sovereignty, territorial integrity,
03:13a complete rejection of unilateral action and phrases like unacceptable, non-negotiable, dangerous,
03:20grave consequences, that's setting a cost to ignoring the message.
03:25This is not about Greenland alone, but about whether NATO survives as a rules-based alliance
03:31or whether it breaks under pressure.
03:35Europe is not reacting emotionally, it's reacting strategically.
03:39Okay, but is it reacting strategically enough?
03:44Who really wins here?
03:45Because everyone understands what a US military intervention on Greenland would really mean.
03:52It would mean one NATO country attacking another.
03:56And the moment that happens, NATO is finished.
03:59You know what I'm saying.
04:01NATO is not held together by aircraft carriers and missile shields.
04:05It's held together by trust.
04:08The trust that Washington will defend Copenhagen, not threaten it.
04:13That Washington will protect European borders, not redraw them.
04:18If Denmark is no longer safe, then no NATO country is.
04:23At that point, NATO becomes an empty shell.
04:27A treaty with zero credibility.
04:29A flag with no authority.
04:32And you know who's been aiming for exactly this for years?
04:37That's right, Vladimir Putin.
04:39For Putin, the unmaking of NATO would be the ultimate geopolitical prize.
04:45For years, Putin has argued that NATO is not a defensive alliance,
04:49but an American power structure that enforces rules it does not follow.
04:54That it lectures the world on sovereignty while violating it when convenient.
04:59That it condemns invasions while reserving the right to carry them out.
05:04A US move on Greenland would hand him the perfect argument.
05:10He would no longer need to justify Ukraine.
05:12He would no longer need to defend Crimea.
05:15He would no longer need to explain Georgia.
05:18He could simply point to Greenland and say,
05:20we are doing what they're doing.
05:22He'd say, the West can't accuse others while being guilty itself.
05:27The moral authority of the Western alliance would collapse overnight.
05:31And there's something else I want you to remember here.
05:35Let's take a step back and look at the larger picture.
05:38Beyond Denmark to the Arctic.
05:41The next great geopolitical battlefield.
05:44Russia has militarized its northern coastline.
05:47It's built new bases.
05:48It's deployed hypersonic weapons.
05:50It's expanded its icebreaker fleet.
05:52It's turned the Arctic into a strategic fortress.
05:55China has declared itself a near-Arctic power.
05:59China is pushing very swiftly into polar shipping lanes and mineral corridors.
06:05And Greenland sits at the center of that map.
06:09It controls North Atlantic access.
06:12It anchors early warning radar.
06:14It guards undersea cables linking Europe and America.
06:18It holds massive reserves of uranium and rare earths.
06:21If NATO fractures, the Arctic is left wide open.
06:27And Moscow and Beijing move in.
06:30Because they've already positioned themselves for the Arctic mission.
06:33And a NATO collapse would leave the Baltics exposed.
06:37Poland isolated.
06:39Scandinavia militarized.
06:40Ukraine abandoned.
06:42And Europe facing Russia without an American shield for the first time since 1945.
06:47That has always been Putin's long game.
06:51To break the transatlantic bond.
06:54To dismantle NATO.
06:56To end the post-war order.
06:59You see it, right?
07:00The brutal irony.
07:02The alliance created by the United States to defend Europe could be destroyed by the United States itself.
07:08If Greenland becomes a battlefield, NATO becomes history.
07:13And Vladimir Putin won't need to fire a single shot to achieve it.
07:18So I'm asking you, if the US gambles on a military move on Greenland, will NATO survive?
07:25Or would it mark the end of the Western alliance as we know it?
07:29Will NATO fall?
07:31Because it can't survive its strongest member turning on its weakest.
07:35And if NATO falls, what happens next?
07:39If the United States decides that might makes right in Greenland,
07:43then every single promise NATO has ever made dies on the ice.
07:48Article 5 becomes a punchline.
07:51Sovereignty becomes a slogan.
07:53And the alliance that claimed to defend rules-based order proves it never truly believed in it.
07:59In that moment, Putin doesn't just win Ukraine.
Be the first to comment