00:00.
00:03.
00:16.
00:17.
00:18.
00:19.
00:20.
00:21.
00:22.
00:23.
00:24.
00:25.
00:26.
00:29.
00:38.
00:40.
00:41.
00:42.
00:43.
00:44.
00:45.
00:47.
00:49.
00:53.
00:57.
00:58.
00:59because of the fact that if there was a stability in Europe with the Russians, it would be necessary to speak Russian.
01:11It absolutely correspond with our view.
01:16If it really seriously affects the strategic view of Europeans,
01:27then it's a positive evolution of their position.
01:32Because recently we heard a statement that absolutely excluded the possibility of a dialogue with Russians,
01:41and in which there was only a need to destroy Russia.
01:47These utopical statements.
01:50But we'll see how it will now be.
01:57If these contacts will begin, of course, we will inform you.
02:09What about Britain?
02:11Yes, Britain is still on a radical position.
02:16In this case, London has no idea of any influence in the situation in the European continent.
02:28In this case, London has no longer a destructive character.
02:33However, even these three cities, which were mentioned in the comments of the three representatives,
02:39this is already a significant difference from our point of view.
02:49The United States, according to the conclusion of the U.S.,
02:55the political and diplomatic role, is our interests.
03:00And we value this effort.
03:05And so we appreciate this effort
03:08and keep our openness to the discussion process.
03:13And we are interested in this discussion process.
Comments