Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 months ago
President Trump signed an executive order targeting foreign-owned proxy advisory firms that he says are pushing "radical" ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) agendas over maximizing investor returns. The move orders the SEC, FTC, and Labor Department to review the practices of firms controlling how American shareholders vote.

The Problem, According to Trump & Experts:
Heritage Foundation's Diana Furchgott-Roth explains:
❌ Recommendations often contradict board advice
❌ Push companies toward less profitable decisions
❌ Foreign ownership means foreign agendas influence American firms
❌ Only 2 firms dominate—no competition or alternative viewpoints
❌ Focus on "political correctness" over qualified workforce and cheap energy
Real-World Impact on Your Wallet:
💰 Electricity prices: States requiring renewables pay 3X MORE than states without mandates

The China Connection:
🇨🇳 70% of wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries are made in China
🇨🇳 China subsidizes these products to undercut American/European producers
🇨🇳 ESG policies may enrich genocidal regime while claiming to help environment
🇨🇳 Avoiding American oil means potentially buying Iranian oil

Regarding ESG documentary: https://www.epochtv.shop/theshadowstate

-
SUBSCRIBE HERE:
http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=THERUNLISTCHANNEL

--
👉 Original Documentary Library:
https://vimeo.com/user109504031/vod_pages
-
🍀 Support NTD: https://donorbox.org/ntd

--
© All Rights Reserved.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00President Trump is taking aim at ESG, or environmental, social, and governance agendas.
00:05He signed an executive order to review foreign proxy advisors.
00:09He says these advisors hold big sway over American corporations and even Americans' retirement accounts.
00:16Trump has determined the advisors are acting on radical ideas and are politically motivated
00:21and are not solely concerned with maximizing investor returns, which he said should be the top priority.
00:27One of the firms responded to the order, telling media they work for institutional investors independently.
00:33Let's look at the impacts of this with Diana Furchgott-Roth,
00:37director of the Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment at the Heritage Foundation.
00:41Thank you for your time, Diana.
00:43This is what we're talking about, Institutional Shareholder Services, Incorporated, and Glass, Lewis & Company, LLC.
00:49What do they do?
00:50And are they affecting Americans' financial bottom line positively or negatively?
00:54What they do is they collect proxy votes and they advise shareholders on how to vote.
01:02So those of our listeners who have shares might find that they get something in the mail from,
01:09which is a question on how they want to vote on a particular matter affecting the company.
01:15And what Glass-Lewis and ISS do is make recommendations.
01:18The problem is that sometimes their recommendations are not aligned with the best interests of the company.
01:27In particular, they're very much focused on environmental, social governance.
01:33They have climate transition plans that they often recommend against the advice of the board.
01:39And that means that these firms get driven in a different direction from what is most profitable for them.
01:48And that's against the interests of the shareholders, because shareholders want profitable firms.
01:54They don't want firms that lose money.
01:57Understood.
01:58Now, what good can come from these reviews that the Securities and Exchange Commission is now ordered to carry out,
02:04including rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, memos?
02:09Well, it's the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Labor Department.
02:14So all three can decide that other proxy advisory firms should be allowed in.
02:21I have always been puzzled why this market was just allocated to ISS and Glass-Lewis.
02:28There should be a number of other companies that are approved to collect these proxy votes.
02:34And the Federal Trade Commission, in particular, will be looking at evidence of antitrust violations,
02:41that these two groups basically colluded to take this business and have the same standards.
02:50And also that these standards are not in the interests of the American people.
02:55They're not in the interests of the firms.
02:58And they are foreign-owned.
03:00They're owned by Canada and Germany.
03:03So these are countries that are propelling an environmentalist agenda.
03:10And this agenda is being reflected on the choices American shareholders have.
03:15Thank you for explaining that, Diana.
03:18And at the same time, we've seen allegations that these ESG policies are costing Americans big bucks
03:24by not going with the cheapest energy policies or even leading to some-called indoctrination of employees
03:30being forced to take courses, training courses, they call them,
03:33that don't align with the common knowledge of how you should normally interact with people.
03:38But broadly speaking, how does this new push from the Trump administration
03:41fit in with broader efforts to dismantle ESG, and how successful could it be?
03:47Well, it could potentially be very successful if other firms are allowed in to collect these proxy votes
03:55and if other firms reflect the preferences of the board.
03:58The ultimate challenge for any organization is choosing the best policies and the best qualified people.
04:05You don't want to choose on the basis of affirmative action.
04:08You want the most qualified workforce that you have.
04:11And you don't want to choose on the basis of political correctness.
04:15You want to have the least expensive, most reliable fuel.
04:19That is going to make your company get further ahead than if they endorse renewables
04:26that might cost the firm more, both in the short and the long run.
04:31So this could have very positive effects on firm governance and the American economy and shareholders' wallets.
04:39Those of our listeners who own shares know that they want them to grow as fast as possible.
04:46That means the most qualified people, the least expensive sources of energy, and the best policies.
04:54It's so interesting how this is turning into something political.
04:57I mean, it depends on who you ask.
04:58If you ask certain people who are not the federal government,
05:00they might say that coal isn't that much cheaper than, say, solar or wind power,
05:05where if you ask the government and they're pretty reliable, they say, no, coal is much cheaper.
05:10So it's all a big mix.
05:12And then the issue of, well, if you get these renewables, where are the solar panels coming from?
05:15China.
05:16So you're enriching a genocidal regime.
05:18It's just something you all have to weigh when you go about this.
05:20Now, you mentioned the FTC and their antitrust investigations, these proxy advisors.
05:25And you mentioned that this may be happening.
05:27Now, how would that impact Americans if it is?
05:31What it would do is it would give American shareholders a broader choice.
05:35It would mean that the boards of these companies can rely on shareholders having the most accurate
05:41information when it comes to votes instead of being prejudiced by foreign-owned proxy companies.
05:50And I think that that's very important.
05:52And in terms of renewables, we know that they're weakening the electricity grid and driving up prices
05:58because in terms of high electricity prices, nine out of the top 10 states in electricity prices
06:06require renewables.
06:07Nine out of the bottom 10 states in electricity prices do not require renewables.
06:13And it's a difference of three to one, about 11 cents an hour in Utah, about 32 cents an hour in California.
06:19And we know what people like, low electricity prices, because that's better on their wallets.
06:26It's so important to pay attention to what you're saying.
06:28And we know that Americans do not like foreigners interfering with their elections, their 401ks, their corporations.
06:36That's why this is big news here.
06:38Now, have we seen any of these racial equity audits or a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
06:44from large American corporations or investment firms that may be tied to these proxy advisors?
06:52I think it's very clear that when proxy advisors have ESG themes and climate transition themes that they're trying to push,
07:00then that prejudices them against using America's oil and natural gas because they're biased against those sources of energy.
07:12But Americans want low electricity prices, not high electricity prices.
07:17And many communities are turning down what they see as ugly wind turbines and ugly solar panels.
07:2570% of wind turbines, solar panels and batteries are made in China.
07:33And China subsidizes these to undercut American and European producers.
07:39So we don't want proxy advisory firms that are lobbying essentially on behalf of China.
07:45Very, very important to note and interesting that you bring that up.
07:49And if they're avoiding American energy and if it's oil, it might be Iranian oil that's being produced in order to fill the gap,
07:56which may not be environmentally created.
07:58And it may just be fueling a state sponsor of terrorism.
08:02So that's pretty clear that that's not in the American interest.
08:06Now, when you look at the Trump administration, how is it going about uprooting and exposing all these things?
08:12Is it using the correct legal avenues and is it doing enough?
08:15President Trump is asking three agencies, the Securities and Exchange Commission that deals with stocks,
08:23the Labor Department that deals with pension funds and the Federal Trade Commission that deals with collusion,
08:33to look at this.
08:34And each of these agencies is going to take a look and see what they come up with and see what their conclusion is.
08:41I have always found it puzzling that it is just these two entities, Glass-Lewis and ISS,
08:48that are so prevalent, that have the advantage in collecting these proxy votes
08:54when they are so biased in terms of environmentalism and DEI, diversity, equity and inclusion.
09:04It is fascinating to think about the complexities of the big picture here.
09:16Thank you for that insight.
09:18I mean, how an American's take-home pay and their actual bottom line can be affected by someone
09:23who doesn't vote in this country, who's not even within the American jurisdiction at all.
09:27Diana Furch-Gott-Roth, we appreciate you.
09:30Thank you very much, Kevin.
09:32Thank you very much, Kevin.
Comments

Recommended