Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 13 hours ago
Transcript
00:00We've got elections coming up next week, and these news cycles are a time when subtle patterns will
00:06emerge from media outlets that can give you a better idea of where their partisan allegiances
00:11lie. That is, if you know what you're looking for. Today, we're diving into how news outlets
00:16decide which stories are newsworthy and how those choices to cover something or not reveal media
00:23bias. Sometimes the coverage starts to sound less like journalism and more like a campaign
00:29ad. Welcome back to Bias Breakdown. Let's revisit the Big Apple, the New York City mayoral race
00:37that's been making national headlines. It's down to three candidates, Democratic Socialist
00:43Zoran Mamdani, Republican Curtis Lewa, and Andrew Cuomo running as an independent. But much of the
00:50media attention has focused on the frontrunner Mamdani. We've covered the narratives in this
00:55race before, examining how left and right outlets have taken opposing angles on his campaign.
01:02Zoran Mamdani ran an exceptional, inspiring, extraordinary campaign, and he's galvanized
01:09the city. This guy is, frankly, he's trash on a lot of levels. And most frightening, in my opinion,
01:14is the anti-Semitism. While that's some of the left-right narrative noise on cable television,
01:19today we're diving into the headlines and story framing of the race. The media story's selection
01:26has been strategic, and the patterns you're about to see make that clear. Let's look at these three
01:32headlines, all from right-leaning outlets. Each one highlights and criticizes Mamdani's connections
01:39with a controversial figure. The Washington Examiner wrote,
01:42Mamdani extravagantly praised the imam at the mosque, Siraj Wahaj. They call it a warm connection
01:49before pointing out that Wahaj had been an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade
01:57Center bombing. He also refused to condemn Osama bin Laden, concluding that Wahaj has a notable
02:04relationship to terrorism. This is someone Mamdani received an endorsement from. The New York Post
02:11quoted Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa, who said Mamdani's standing with this imam should be
02:17disqualifying, along with independent candidate Andrew Cuomo, who also condemned his opponent,
02:23and Vice President J.D. Vance, who called on Democrats to condemn Mamdani's pose with Wahaj.
02:30In Fox News' write-up, they similarly include five voices criticizing Mamdani for the picture,
02:37and included it during evening primetime coverage on the network.
02:40The saying, show me who your friends are, I'll tell you who you are, that is applicable here.
02:46Zoran Mandani has palled around with socialists, with communists, now this radical extremist imam.
02:53This controversy was largely covered on only the right side of the media spectrum.
02:58We didn't find any stories on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, or NBC. But that said, CBS News did have a link,
03:07and the New York Times published a story. But the framing reads very differently.
03:13On CBS's website, a search for the story came back with this headline,
03:18fresh attack launched on mayoral race frontrunner Zoran Mamdani. The New York Times used similar
03:25language, reporting that Cuomo is doubling down on a line of attack by linking Mamdani to Wahaj.
03:32The Times also gave more detail into the New York Post's characterization of Wahaj as an unindicted
03:39co-conspirator, noting he was never charged in the case, and linked to the outlet's previous coverage
03:45showing that the list Mr. Wahaj appeared on was criticized by former terrorism prosecutors
03:52as being overly broad. In its article, the Times includes voices critical of Cuomo's criticism.
03:59You can see how this same election story is framed differently, with opposing takeaways
04:05depending on which article you read. Multiple forms of media bias are at play here. We'll start
04:11with bias by story choice, as defined by media watchdog all sides. Right-leaning outlets highlighted
04:18the Mamdani-Wahaj story heavily, framing it as a political scandal. Left-leaning outlets,
04:24on the other hand, either didn't cover it or framed it as a political attack, downplaying
04:30the elements the right saw as newsworthy. This is a clear example of how story choice shapes
04:36public perception through what gets covered, what gets emphasized, and what gets left out.
04:43The differences in political opinion between outlets created unbalanced coverage, making it easy to
04:50unmask how each news outlet viewed the story. Since there was a broad pattern of news outlets on the
04:57left not covering the story at all, that's also biased by story omission. Because for people who
05:03primarily consume CNN, NBC, or ABC News, the controversy never even happened. The absence of
05:11stories creates its own kind of public perception distortion. The American media landscape is filled with
05:18daily misses by both sides of the political lean. Straight Arrow News compiles them for you to see
05:23at san.com. Back to it, news outlets on the right that chose to give the matter attention often omitted
05:31alternate viewpoints to the story. The New York Post and Fox News stacked voices condemning Mamdani.
05:39That imbalance of perspective also fits this form of media bias.
05:43The same imam met with Mayor Bloomberg, met with Mayor de Blasio, campaigned alongside Eric Adams,
05:50and the only time it became an issue of national attention was when I met with him.
05:54And even after Mamdani spoke out to explain his interactions with Wahaj, Fox News and the
06:01Washington Examiner didn't follow up to cover his defense. The New York Post, however, did publish a follow-up.
06:08I'm not saying one side of the media is right or wrong in how they covered the story. You're welcome
06:14to come to that conclusion on your own, but that's not my point. When the same story is covered very
06:20differently across left and right outlets, that pattern reveals a clear divide and bias in media coverage.
06:30These next examples we're going to run through more quickly with less specific details to each story,
06:35but just pointing out the same sort of media bias by story choices and framing.
06:41These articles, again from right-leaning sources, focus on remarks by New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik,
06:49who called Mamdani a jihadist and warned of a jihad coming. Left-leaning outlets, on the other hand,
06:56describe GOP criticisms, including Stefanik's remarks, as attacks against Mamdani and label them
07:03Islamophobic. The right-leaning coverage focused on amplifying individual voices criticizing Mamdani,
07:11giving those perspectives more weight in the headlines. Left-leaning outlets, in contrast,
07:16highlighted voices calling those criticisms racist or Islamophobic, making that perspective more
07:23prominent. Recent controversies involving both Mamdani and Cuomo were covered differently across
07:30partisan outlets. For example, Cuomo faced scrutiny on the left after a radio show host claimed Mamdani
07:37would cheer on a terror attack on the U.S., to which Cuomo responded, that's another problem.
07:44God forbid another 9-11. Can you imagine Mamdani in the seat?
07:49Yeah, I could. He'd be cheering.
07:52It's another problem. This controversy received heavy coverage on the left side of the media
08:00spectrum. And while some right-leaning media did cover the Cuomo controversy, it read a lot
08:06differently. Fox News highlights Cuomo's response to the criticism, who ripped Mamdani's victim narrative.
08:14While the New York Post downplayed the radio incident, framing it as Cuomo being criticized by
08:20Dems for laughing at the host's joke. The same story, but told in very different ways.
08:26Coverage was also uneven, as other right-leaning outlets like The Washington Examiner, The Daily
08:31Wire, and Breitbart omitted the controversy and didn't touch it at all. And finally, a speech by
08:38Mamdani was described by left-leaning outlets as emotional, with focus on his condemnation of what
08:44he characterized as Islamophobic attacks. But right-leaning outlets focused on criticism of
08:51the speech from the vice president, focusing on a portion of Mamdani's remarks that his Muslim
08:57aunt did not feel safe riding the subway after 9-11. I want to speak to the memory of my aunt
09:04who stopped taking the subway after September 11th because she did not feel safe in her hijab.
09:15Same speech, same story, totally different takeaways in news coverage from left and right
09:22outlets. If all the headlines on one side of the political media are negative toward a candidate,
09:28and the headlines on the other side largely defend that same candidate, that's a sign news outlets
09:34are choosing and framing stories based on their own political leanings and the political views of
09:40their audience. If you lean right, right-leaning news reinforces your beliefs. If you lean left,
09:48left-leaning news does the same thing. And you're entitled to your own political opinions,
09:53and I get it. It's easier and sometimes more fun to stick to the side that you agree with.
09:59But I challenge you to see the bias in how both sides select and frame their stories.
10:06Today, we highlighted just a few examples of just one race, but maybe it makes you think about other
10:13races too, in Virginia, in New Jersey, this election cycle, and the next, and how the partisan news knows
10:21exactly what they're doing. Carefully choosing what stories to tell and how to frame them in order
10:28to fuel one base. And that's your bias breakdown. Now, usually during the wrap right here, I tell
10:36you where to find us and how to download the show, but you know the drill, and I'll be in the comments
10:41with you on YouTube and Spotify. Today, in my last few minutes with you, I want to talk about something
10:48a little more personal. I want you to get to know me a little bit better, because I hope that you'll
10:52come back here each week to be with me. I've mentioned my grandpa, who I call Papa, in several
10:58episodes of Bias Breakdown, because he really taught me so much. And I feel like I am who I am because of
11:05him. He valued knowledge like nobody else that I know. He was a high school dropout, self-taught,
11:14and allowed curiosity to build his wealth of knowledge. I have one example that I think
11:21connects to this episode. Papa had a very strong faith. He knew what he believed, but he would go to
11:28churches of other faiths to learn. Not to challenge them or his own beliefs, but he would put himself in
11:35the pews of other churches simply to learn and to understand others. He valued perspectives and people in
11:43general. We talk a lot about politics in this podcast. I know that that can rile people up. I get it.
11:51But I want to be a resource for you to see other perspectives. Not to challenge your beliefs, but to
11:58help you understand why others may think differently. Papa passed away one year ago tomorrow. But by getting
12:07to know me, I'm hoping that you'll get to know a little piece of him too. Thank you so much for
12:14listening to me and giving me the time of day. And thank you to those of you who are helping to build
12:20up our Bias Breakdown community in the comments on YouTube. And I look very forward to jumping in there
12:26later on to respond to some of y'all. Big thank you to Ian and Allie for putting the graphics and this video
12:32together. And I will see you next time.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended