Appeals Court Issues Ruling On If Trump Can Deploy The National guard To Protect ICE Facility

Watch Appeals Court Issues Ruling On If Trump Can Deploy The National guard To Protect ICE Facility - Rizzle on Dailymotion

Transcript

00:00Appeals Court Issues Ruling on if Trump Can Deploy the National Guard to Protect Ice Facility

00:05The Ninth Circuit Court's unexpected ruling supported President Donald Trump's deployment

00:10of the National Guard in Portland, Oregon, to protect an ice facility.

00:15Despite the city resembling a Mad Max scene for months with officials prioritizing restorative

00:21justice, the court backed law and order for a change. Imagine that.

00:25White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stated that Donald Trump lawfully safeguarded federal

00:31assets amid unchecked violent riots. Portland leaders preferred negotiation over ending

00:37chaos. Although this ruling favors sanity, the unrest continues, signaling that the disorder

00:42persists. Judge Ryan Nelson, a Donald Trump appointee, affirmed that the federal response

00:48was not only lawful but also proportionate. It highlighted the violent nature of Portland's

00:55Molotov cocktail hurling and property damage. Conversely, Judge Susan Graeber criticized this

01:01perspective, trivializing the protests as benign exercises in First Amendment rights, reflecting

01:06her ideological stance. Ah yes, the noble tradition of nudity and arson in defense of civil liberties.

01:14Judge Graeber criticized the majority, accusing them of eroding principles by permitting federal

01:18intervention. Meanwhile, in reality, protests have persisted since June.

01:23Portland was a literal war zone, confirmed by Donald, Trump's debated tooth social post.

01:30This ruling has major implications. The Ninth Circuit now permits federal intervention against

01:35anarchists torching courthouses. Media outlets criticize militarization while falsely claiming

01:41threats to trans rights. Donald Trump's win sanctions federal protection. Yet vigilance remains

01:47crucial, considering contrasting judicial stances and future protests.