Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 6 weeks ago
South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas has rejected the use of the word 'toxic' to describe the state's algal bloom. This has led to concerns of mixed messaging.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00Masses of fish and other sea life have died since the algal bloom began circulating in
00:07South Australian waters earlier this year.
00:10But does that mean we should be calling it toxic?
00:14The state's premier Peter Malinowskis insists that term isn't accurate.
00:18He says he's not trying to play semantics or downplay the severity of the bloom, but
00:22rather allay fears it's not safe to go to the beach.
00:26I just think we've got to be a little bit careful about how we approach this because
00:30we want people to follow the public health advice, we want people to be aware of any
00:35risks where they exist, but let's not scare 1.7 million South Australians from visiting
00:40the beach this summer when there's no need to do that.
00:42It's the kind of messaging coastal businesses want to hear as they head into an uncertain
00:47summer, but according to one scientist it's not accurate.
00:52The species mix that we've got at the moment is toxic and the reason it's toxic is that
00:56it has brevatoxins within them.
00:59And so because brevatoxins are toxic to humans, we class the mix of species that we've got
01:06blooming at the moment as being toxic.
01:09They are also of course toxic to fish.
01:11Faith Coleman says humans would have to consume vast amounts of seawater for the brevatoxins
01:16to have any major impact, but she says it's important public messaging is accurate to
01:21create trust in the community.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended