Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 months ago
This discussion delves into the powerful role of skin color in visual politics, tracing its complex history and contemporary impact. The sources reveal how colonial powers used visual classification, particularly through early photography and racial science, to establish and reinforce a continuum of white dominance and racial subordination. This historical project of visually ranking people based on appearance, creating what one source calls a "shattered archive," continues to shape how we perceive race today, influencing everything from modern advertising, which often commodifies diverse identities without dismantling hierarchies, to the lived experiences of colorism, where individuals with darker skin face prejudice both within and between racialized groups, highlighting a direct link between historical visual practices and present-day inequalities.

[Sub: Arabic, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Persian, Russian, Spanish, Ukrainian]

A Global Critical Race and Racism Framework: Racial Entanglements and Deep and Malleable Whiteness

AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF VISUAL MEDIA: A CASE OF DIESEL ADVERTISEMENTS - KU ScholarWorks

All notes 1/6/2025

Race, Visuality, and International Relations.wav

Skin shade and relationships: how colourism pits Black and mixed Black-White women against each other - Frontiers

The Racial Visual Imaginary of International Relations - Oxford Academic

Why Critical Race Theory Is Important - International Viewpoint

olaf008.pdf

NotebookLM can be inaccurate; please double check its responses.

PLEASE NOTE: This podcast may contain errors and therefore it is essential to read and understand the actual source document.

Category

📚
Learning
Comments

Recommended