This essay contributes to contemporary discussions concerning so-called animal politics by drawing from the history of the notion of political animal. Two different historical meanings of the notion are identified: (1) normative political #animality that is intrinsically linked with #rationality, #language, and #justice; (2) biological political animality that focuses on collaboration for the sake of a common aim. The former is applicable only to human beings, while the latter can also be used in relation to other animals. After briefly discussing the Aristotelian background of the notion, the essay argues that in medieval #Aristotelian tradition, the normative meaning prevailed and the biological one was set aside. However, it is precisely the biological notion that appears useful today. The essay suggests several ways in which it might benefit contemporary theoretical discussions concerning animals, thus laying ground for further developments in #animalpolitics.
Political animality Juhana Toivanen South J Philos. 2024;62:403–420
Please note: All but the English translation are computer generated and may contain errors.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
