00:00I would like to ask, in the Sabah video case that was changed,
00:05the information was that the public was notified about the corruption case before it was reported to the SPRM.
00:14And since Article 7.1.1 does not protect public prosecution,
00:20is there a change that is proposed that will introduce an exception for public prosecution of cases of public interest?
00:27There is no change that would improve Article 7.1.1 to protect information that has caused public and public indignation.
00:35However, if an indignation is made to the SPRM agency,
00:39first of all, the information should be protected.
00:42Because here, I am the chairperson for the SPRM,
00:46the SPRM agency will evaluate whether the information is seen as an exception or not.
00:52Just like the police report, like the FIR, First Information Report,
00:56when we go to the SPRM agency and we are the informant,
01:01we want protection, the SPRM agency will provide that justification.
01:06It means that we cannot go to the public domain and then we want to get protection.
01:12Because sometimes, the informant does not have the intention of good faith with permission.
01:17He must have a good intention.
01:21That is why the SPRM agency in the current Act says that it needs to go to the previous SPRM agency.
Comments