00:00Mr. Speaker I have listened carefully to concerns raised about the single justice
00:04procedure. As a first step I have asked the Courts and Tribunals Service to
00:09redesign the SJP notice and make it clearer. I will also be calling in SJP
00:15prosecutors to discuss ways in which we could ensure the public interest is
00:20considered by them in advance of making prosecutions.
00:24The picture. Mr. Speaker earlier this year a decision by the Chief Magistrate
00:28overturned the use of SJP for rail fines, potentially nullifying and requiring the
00:33refunding of as many as 74,000 fines. It's been reported in the past few days
00:37that LNER has been bringing similar prosecutions under SJP without supplying
00:42any evidence at all. I don't make any assumption about the guilt or innocence
00:46of anyone involved in these prosecutions but justice must be open, it must be
00:51clear and it must be fair. It is unfair to expect people to engage with a process
00:57without it being clear what evidence has been laid against them. Can the Minister
01:01confirm that her department will keep these principles at the heart of all of
01:05our justice practices including SJP's? I will raise the evidential questions
01:12referred to by my honourable friend with representatives of the train operating
01:16companies when they and other SJP prosecutors join me in discussions in
01:20the next few weeks. I am clear that the single justice procedure is vital for
01:25the efficient running of the Magistrates Court, however it must
01:29operate fairly and effectively. Let me say this, I will not tolerate poor
01:34practice and I won't hesitate to fundamentally reform this system if that
01:39is what is required.
Comments