Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 years ago
During a Senate Health Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) questioned witnesses about the consequences to women’s health after the overturning of Roe v. Wade and the need to pass the Women's Health Protection Act.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Senator Baldwin. Thank you. I want to thank you Senator Murray and Chairman
00:05Sanders for holding this hearing because in the wake of the overturning of Roe, I
00:11think we must keep drawing attention to the dire consequences on women's health
00:16across this country and particularly in my home state, states like Wisconsin.
00:22Before the Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade, generations of women in this
00:28country had only known a country with the right to abortion care and they only
00:34knew a country where every woman had the freedom to make their own choices about
00:38if and when to start a family. But when those freedoms were stripped away,
00:45Wisconsinites were sent back to the year 1849, the era they live under a
00:53pre-Civil War criminal ban on abortion care. And I've heard such horrifying
01:00stories since that ban went into effect about women bleeding out, about
01:04contracting life-threatening infections before receiving care, about women forced
01:10to travel hours and hours away from their families and support systems to
01:15receive care for an unviable pregnancy. Thankfully, more recently, Wisconsin has
01:22been able to take important steps to restore abortion services in three
01:26communities, three counties. We have 72 counties. However, without access to care
01:33statewide, too many Wisconsinites must still drive hours, take time off work,
01:38arrange for child care, and face medically unnecessary barriers before
01:43getting the health care they need. And while some people debate whether it
01:48should be the state or the federal government who should decide abortion
01:52rights, I believe it's women who should decide about these issues. And that's why
01:57we must pass the Women's Health Protection Act, which I author, ensuring
02:04that women have the right to make health care decisions and freedom to access
02:09abortion care no matter where they live. Dr. Linden, I'm so glad that you are here
02:14today to share your experience about providing care in Wisconsin. Your
02:19testimony highlights the impossible landscape that you and other
02:24providers have been forced to navigate in the wake of the Dobbs decision and
02:29the effects on real patients in the state of Wisconsin. These stories aren't
02:34hypotheticals. They're about real people. And I wanted you to tell us a little bit
02:41more about how patients in Wisconsin were affected immediately after Dobbs.
02:46How was the Dobbs decision and Wisconsin's archaic 1849 law, how has
02:54that harmed Wisconsinites? And I imagine there were people who had appointments
02:58for care on the day that the Dobbs decision came out. Absolutely. Thank you,
03:03Senator Baldwin. So yeah, you're exactly right. Because of the 1849 law, this was
03:08not a law that if Dobbs was passed, then we had 30 days or 90 days or whatever. It
03:13was, of course, as we've mentioned a couple times, there have been questions about the
03:17enforceability. But because of the risks of $10,000 fines and six years in prison,
03:22that went into effect for us immediately. So at 9, 10 a.m. on the 24th of June, we
03:29ceased providing care that moment. We had patients in our clinic, we had patients
03:33scheduled the next day, and staff members had to go out into the lobby and tell
03:37them, because of something that just happened states away, you cannot receive
03:42care here today. And it was it was incredibly difficult for patients and
03:47staff to try to figure out next steps to help them get health care. Thank you. I've
03:52introduced legislation that I just described, the Women's Health Protection
03:57Act. This bill would guarantee that doctors have the freedom to provide
04:02abortion care and give patients the ability to receive the care they need
04:06nationwide. How would passage of that act impact in Wisconsin and improve care for
04:15patients right now? Thank you. And as a Wisconsinite, I do want to thank you very
04:20much for your leadership on this issue. As I mentioned, we have, and as you
04:25mentioned, we've resumed abortion care in Wisconsin. But the future of abortion
04:28access in Wisconsin is anything but clear. Even as we are providing abortion
04:33care right now, we are still practicing under medically unnecessary restrictions,
04:37including 24-hour waiting periods, ban on telemedicine, parental consent law,
04:41mandatory ultrasounds, etc. So as a physician who sees the impact of these
04:46restrictions every single day, I can tell you that federal protections for
04:50abortion access will only improve the care that we can provide our patients in
04:54Wisconsin. Thank you. And what do you want us to know about the current state of
05:02abortion? Tell us how these barriers that you just described that are in part of
05:07state law, how do they affect patients that you see? I think first and
05:14foremost, they delay care. We know, as you mentioned, abortion is only accessible in
05:19Wisconsin right now in three counties. Our state is a lot bigger than three
05:24counties. So patients are already having to travel long distances. We know that
05:2824-hour bans are often not 24 hours. We have a same physician law in the state
05:32of Wisconsin. So the patient has the same physician for a counseling appointment is
05:37to receive their medication abortion. So oftentimes between those two appointments,
05:41it can be a week or plus before they can come back. And abortion is an incredibly
05:45time-sensitive procedure. So all of these additional restrictions are creating
05:50hoops and barriers for patients to receive routine or what should be
05:54routine health care. Thank you.
Comments

Recommended