Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 years ago
There were cries of “shameful” and “bring back Bercow” in the Commons as Sir Lindsay Hoyle set out his reasoning behind selecting both the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition’s amendments to the SNP Gaza ceasefire motion. A Conservative MP could be heard to mutter that the Commons Speaker was “moving the goalposts” as he first confirmed his plans.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 >>Mr Speaker We now come to the SNP motion on Gaza. I
00:10 understand that the second motion on the Order Paper will not be moved today. This is a highly
00:16 sensitive subject on which feelings are running high in the House, in the nation and throughout
00:22 the world. I think it is important on this occasion that the House is able to consider
00:29 the widest possible range of options. I have therefore decided to select the amendments
00:36 both in the name of the Prime Minister and in the name of the Leader of the Opposition,
00:50 because the operation of standing order 31 will prevent another amendment from being
00:55 moved after the Government have moved their amendments. I will exceptionally call the
00:59 Opposition Front Bench spokesperson to move their amendment at the beginning of the debate.
01:05 Once the SNP spokesperson has moved their motion, at the end of the debate the House
01:12 will have an opportunity to take a decision on the Official Opposition Amendment. If that
01:19 is agreed to, there is a final question on the main motion as amended. If the Official
01:24 Opposition Amendment is not agreed to, I will call the Minister to move the Government amendment
01:29 formally. That will engage the provisions of standing order 31.
01:44 The next vote will be on the original words in the SNP motion. If that is not agreed to,
01:54 the House will have the opportunity to vote on the Government amendment. Proceeding this
01:59 way will allow a vote to take place potentially on all proposals from each of the three main
02:08 parties. I can inform the House that there is a precedent for an Official Opposition
02:19 spokesperson being called second in the debate.
02:34 Every Minister is called to speak in the debate in the circumstances. However, no Government
02:38 amendment has been tabled. I should also inform the House that the Clerk of the House will
02:44 be placing in the Library a letter to me about today's proceedings. I have asked for that
02:50 letter to be made available in the vote office as soon as possible.
02:56 Finally, I should tell the House that, in my opinion, the operation of standing order
03:01 31, which comes the way amendments to the Opposition motions are dealt with, reflects
03:07 an outdated approach, which restricts—[Interruption.] Order. You will be going and not be voting.
03:31 That is the first one to leave, then. If you want to, do it.
03:38 No, then. Firstly, I should tell the House that, in my opinion, the operation of standing
03:42 order, which comes the way amendments to the Opposition motions are dealt with, reflects
03:46 an outdated approach, which restricts the operations that can put the House—[Interruption.]
03:52 It is my intention to ask the Procedure Committee to consider the operation.
03:59 I now call Brendan Horner to move the motion.

Recommended