00:00Sir, this document which you brought, this property identification map,
00:05how would this establish the link between the real property on the ground and the record as you've mentioned earlier?
00:13Your Honor, just to be more accurate, when we're talking about real property on the ground,
00:19are we talking about the property covered by TCT No. 146-2024-010775?
00:30We are asking in general and specific terms, Your Honor.
00:33Yes, so since you're asking specific terms, are you specifically asking about the property covered by the TCT that I've
00:41just mentioned
00:42and which you mentioned in your own offer?
00:44My question is only limited as to how this document could establish the link, as I've mentioned earlier, Your Honor.
00:53Your Honor, we understand that.
00:55But as explained by counsel, he is specifically asking in general terms and in specific terms.
01:00So if you're asking in specific terms about the property in the ground, we're asking him now to specify.
01:10Are you specifically asking about that property covered by TCT No. 146-2024-010775?
01:21Again, the same property mentioned in your offer.
01:25Lieutenant Alosa, are you making an objection?
01:29It is vague, Your Honor.
01:30That's why we're asking for clarification and specification because the question is vague.
01:36You can make the corresponding objection on the ground of vagueness and let the court rule instead of asking questions
01:41of opposing.
01:42Yes, we submit, Your Honor.
01:44We submit.
01:44I believe Attorney Linden is laying the basis and will proceed to, in relation to his formal offer, TCT ending
01:52in 0775.
01:53Correct, Attorney Linden?
01:54You will proceed to that point in a bit.
01:57Yes, Your Honor.
01:58You may proceed, counsel.
01:59Objection is overruled in the ground of vagueness.