Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 2 horas
Esta semana, en la Redacción al Desnudo de El Espectador, les contamos que cometimos un error significativo en la portada del periódico impreso. El martes dedicamos el Tema del Día a las correcciones que el Congreso debía hacer a la reforma pensional, como lo ordenó la Corte Constitucional. Pero a la hora de hacer el llamado en la portada, en el título además, confundimos la pensional con la laboral. ¡Un despiste total!

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:00Hello, there weren't many mistakes, but they were very significant.
00:05one no more and no less than on the front page of the printed newspaper,
00:08The other one was in the headline of an editorial, no more and no less.
00:13And well asked @JL García in his "ball of ears" of many who arrived about the latter,
00:21How could this have happened?
00:22These were perhaps the two most important reforms that the previous government managed to pass in Congress.
00:29But they are two different things, they are not the same.
00:33Today's topic is dedicated to the corrections that Congress must make, or should make, this
00:40week
00:40to the pension reform, as ordered by the Constitutional Court,
00:45But when it comes to making the call on the cover, in the title, moreover,
00:50We confuse pensions with employment.
00:53Total confusion.
00:54And I have a reader of this section who occasionally complains about my speech difficulties,
01:02which, well, are difficult to correct here in front of the camera,
01:06but under no circumstances should they reach and be transferred to the texts.
01:12It wasn't that, although it did resemble the awful DDB that we missed in the headline of last year's editorial.
01:20Monday,
01:20and which generated so many justified reprimands.
01:24It wasn't a screw-up by the director that got written down,
01:27but rather an oversight when using a tool that the system has that allows you to hide part of the text
01:33so that it fits in the space it has in the printed version, but that it works well in the digital version.
01:40But instead of hiding cooperation, we only hide the cooperation itself.
01:46And that's how we ended up with that extra D flying.
01:50Of course, a simple inspection would have prevented it.
01:53Not as serious as the previous ones, but we also changed its name this week
01:58to a political organization, Colombia Justa Libres.
02:03And it wasn't a simple oversight, because on that balcony where we recorded the appointment of Ricardo Arias
02:11of that movement, of the Human Rights Office, which barely had four paragraphs,
02:17In addition to the two times we mentioned the Colombia Justa y Libres movement in the featured section,
02:23instead of Colombia Justa Libres, which is what it's called.
02:27And a similar oversight, this time not with names, but with ranks,
02:32Alfonso Luna caught us out this week when he registered the appointment of retired Colonel Luis Alfonso Plazas Vega
02:39as ambassador to Peru, replacing his wife Tania Vega,
02:44which already had the approval of that country.
02:49No wonder Don Alfonso asked us, "When was the colonel promoted?"
02:53Because we did indeed promote him to general.
02:58But the worst part is that it was actually the recycling of an old, undetected mistake.
03:05We realized that we had already promoted him on September 17th.
03:10upon registering a decision by the US justice system in his favor.
03:15And I'll end with a gentle reprimand that seems a bit extreme to me,
03:20But since there were a couple of indignant comments on the video in this section last week,
03:28I feel it deserves an explanation.
03:31The outrage stemmed from his having said here that to snoop on why they called a mega-prison
03:39jail,
03:40I would have resorted to the easy option of asking artificial intelligence.
03:45It was interpreted as him being there to validate the use of artificial intelligence
03:50as a valid source of journalistic information.
03:53I would just say that first, as I said here, I had gone to the primary source, the prison authority,
03:59where he had verified that there was no category such as mega-prison.
04:05And then yes, that's why I say it was out of curiosity, I asked the guide why they called it that.
04:11But overall, despite the outrage it aroused,
04:14Yes, I do think it's an ultraconservative view of technology.
04:17The problem isn't using such a useful tool as artificial intelligence,
04:23but to know what it is used for, and in journalism, whether it affects the reliability of the information or
04:29No.
04:30For a child like this, whose information is unaffected by anything,
04:34Well, to demonize its use, I tell you, seems like an exaggeration to me.
04:39Okay, that's all. See you later. Bye.
04:47Bye.

Recomendada