Skip to playerSkip to main content
Former Sandiganbayan presiding justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang maintained that no one offered her anything in exchange for her testimony before the impeachment court on Monday, September 14. She said she would never testify if anyone had offered her anything material or otherwise. (Video courtesy of Senate of the Philippines)

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! -
https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00And I will never testify if ever I was offered anything material or otherwise.
00:07My testimony is not for sale, sir.
00:09Okay.
00:10Well, the Supreme Court now allows service even by emails.
00:18I understand that, ma'am.
00:19But under the rules, isn't it the court's duty to serve the sub-pina?
00:23If your honor, please, the question is argumentative.
00:26The service of the court was done, and it was done through this representation.
00:31I'm clarifying what happened, Your Honor.
00:33This goes into the connection of the witness to the prosecution.
00:38We follow the same rules.
00:40Justice Tang would know.
00:42Please answer, Justice Tang.
00:44Can you please take the question?
00:46It's very basic.
00:47Under the rules, isn't it the court's duty to serve the sub-pina?
00:51Well, yes, but sometimes the court designates another person to do it.
00:58Was Representative Diokno ever designated by the court to serve the sub-pina?
01:02That I do not know, sir.
01:02You just assumed that the court designated him to serve the sub-pina?
01:07I assumed that he had the authority to send it to me.
01:11May we know, Your Honor, if the court issued any written authority for Representative Diokno to issue the sub-pina
01:17to this witness?
01:17No, that was the address given by the panel of prosecutors for the witness, retired Justice Tang.
01:26And under the rules, we place whatever address—we'd rather send the sub-pina to whatever address is given us by
01:34the prosecutor.
01:35And in your case, when it's time for you to issue the request for sub-pina, we will do the
01:39same, counsel.
01:39Yeah, I understand that, Your Honor. But my question is, was there any authority that was issued by the court
01:46for Representative Diokno to serve the sub-pina by email to the witness?
01:50If, Your Honor, please, the presiding officer is not under oath. He's not testifying.
01:56I don't think it is the prerogative of the defense to ask him a question.
02:01The court already answered. That was the address given. That is why that is where the sub-pina was sent,
02:06counsel.
02:07We will just move on, Your Honor. Were you promised anything in return in exchange for your testimony today, Pauman?
02:15No, sir. And I will never testify if ever I was offered anything material or otherwise.
02:23My testimony is not for sale, sir.
02:26Okay. This is totally unrelated, but we just wanted to confirm for a fact. Are you vying for an ambassadorial
02:31position at the moment?
02:32No, sir. I am retired and I want to enjoy my retirement.
02:36All right. Thank you for that clarification, ma'am.
Comments

Recommended