Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 months ago
A city council east of Columbus was handed a proposal worth more than five billion dollars and voted unanimously to reject it. Two states away, protesters outside a utility open house carried signs reading "You can't drink data." And an energy investment firm now says as many as half of the data centers planned in this country may never get built on schedule. Here's what actually moved.

COMMUNITY — Pataskala, Ohio's city council voted unanimously to accept the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation and deny Aligned Data Centers' proposal for a 200-megawatt, three-building campus in the city's industrial park. Aligned had told residents the facility would bring more than 100 permanent jobs and add more than $5 billion in investment to the area. The council declined anyway. The decision does not close the question: residents had already gathered more than 500 signatures to force a public vote, and Pataskala voters will decide in November whether to ban large data centers in the city outright — a measure that would apply regardless of what any future developer proposes.

COMMUNITY — Residents who have spent months fighting data center development in Davie and Davidson counties, North Carolina turned a Duke Energy open house in Mocksville into a protest. Demonstrators held signs reading "We pay the bill, Duke takes the profit" and "You can't drink data" as utility representatives inside outlined a proposal for new gas-fired generation across the two counties and took questions from residents. Yadkin Riverkeeper Nicole Eastman was among the protesters, raising concerns about what the plants and the data center growth driving them would mean for the river's ecosystem. Her argument was that the additional power plants exist to meet data center demand, not the needs of the people living in Davie and Davidson County.

⚖️ LEGAL — Wheeling, West Virginia residents opposed to a data center planned for the former Centre Foundry & Machine Company site in Warwood con

Category

🤖
Tech
Transcript
00:00A city council in central Ohio just turned down $5 billion and told the developer no.
00:06Two states away, protesters outside a utility open house held signs reading,
00:12you can't drink data, and an energy investment firm now says up to half of every data center
00:18planned in this country may never get billed on schedule. We begin in Pataskala, Ohio,
00:26a city east of Columbus, where the city council voted unanimously to accept its planning and zoning
00:34commissions. Recommendation and deny Align Data Center's proposal outright. The project would
00:41have been a 200-megawatt campus, three buildings inside the city's industrial park. Align told
00:48residents the facility would bring more than 100 permanent jobs and more than $5 billion in
00:54investment. The council said no anyway, and the fight is not finished, because residents had
01:01already gathered more than 500 signatures to force a public vote. That means in November,
01:08Pataskala voters will decide whether to ban large data centers in the city altogether,
01:14regardless of what any developer brings them next. That same anger showed up two states away,
01:21outside a Duke Energy open house in Moxville, North Carolina. Residents who have spent months
01:28fighting data center development in Davie and Davidson counties, turned the utility's public
01:34information session into a protest, holding signs that read, we pay the bill, Duke takes the profit,
01:42and you can't drink data. Duke is proposing new gas-fired generation across both counties.
01:48Yadkin Riverkeeper Nicole Eastman was among the crowd, warning about what those plants,
01:55and the data centers behind them, would mean for the river's ecosystem. Her argument was blunt,
02:02these additional power plants are really just to meet the need of data centers.
02:07So it is not something the community members of Davie and Davidson County will be using.
02:14That opposition is now making its way into courtrooms in Wheeling, West Virginia. Residents fighting a
02:21data center planned for the former center foundry site in Warwood staged what they called a very public
02:28data center hearing. In the third floor ballroom of Waterfront Hall, it was a forum they organized
02:34themselves. With city council members and community critics on the panel, alongside attorney David
02:41Croft, who has served as legal counsel for the developer, Silicon Foundation, that group has
02:48proposed investing more than $100 million in the vacant Brownfield site. Meanwhile, the residence's
02:55civil suit has pulled in the state itself. Attorney General J.B. McCuskey moved to intervene,
03:01because the complaint argues that House Bill 2014, West Virginia's law governing high-impact data
03:09centers, is unconstitutional. And the money is starting to notice. Kimmeridge Energy Management
03:17told Bloomberg that as many as half of the data centers currently proposed in the United States are
03:24at risk of delay or cancellation, not because demand for computing has softened, but because of
03:31political backlash and the sheer difficulty of building physical infrastructure. Managing partner
03:37and co-founder Ben Dell put it this way. The Silicon Valley model is running into a real-world infrastructure
03:44constraint. The firm points to rising litigation at the local level and bipartisan opposition in
03:51Pennsylvania, Texas and Ohio, states once considered friendly to these projects. Kimmeridge has skin in
03:59the game, holding stakes in natural gas producers. Indell says those delays would likely force cuts to gas
04:07demand forecasts. The pressure on the grid is only half the story, and water tells the other half.
04:16Austin is trying to write its rules before a single large campus is proposed inside city limits.
04:23Council members held a dedicated data center work session this week, ahead of action to begin amending
04:29the city's land development code. City staff recommended new siting and zoning standards for higher
04:36impact facilities, along with requirements covering water efficiency, noise and lighting. Council member
04:44Vanessa Fuentes went further, saying she is pursuing a full ban on large-scale data centers in Austin
04:51and would back a moratorium in the meantime. Her framing was direct. It is clear that data centers
04:58present real risks to our people, environment and local resources, and the city will not wait for a
05:06crisis to happen here. Meanwhile, the federal government is keeping old power plants alive to cover the gap.
05:14The Energy Department issued an emergency order under Section 202C of the Federal Power Act,
05:22directing PJM and Constellation Energy to keep Units 3 and 4 of the Eddystone Generating
05:28Station in Pennsylvania available to operate. From August 23 through November 20,
05:35each unit carries a capacity of 380 megawatts. The reasoning sits in the department's own
05:42reliability analysis. PJM is facing roughly 25 gigawatts of projected load growth, 15 of that from
05:51data centers alone, against about 17 gigawatts of announced fossil fuel retirements. That is a 13-state
05:59grid plus the District of Columbia. And the math no longer closes without plants that were supposed to be
06:06gone. Voters are about to get the final word in one Kansas City. The Emporia City Commission voted
06:15unanimously to place two citizen-initiated petitions on the November 3 general election ballot. Resolution
06:23number 3799 submits a proposed ordinance prohibiting high-impact data centers. A bar that could hold for as
06:32long as 10 years. A second question would ban battery energy storage systems. Both petitions grew out of
06:39citizen organizing that began after commissioners approved zoning changes this summer, opening the
06:46door to data center development. The effort has already been through a Lyon County courtroom, where a judge
06:53ordered the question onto the ballot. Even if voters approve it, the ordinance cannot be published or take effect
07:00until the pending legal questions are resolved. And the financial commitment on the other side of this
07:08fight is staggering. Commissioners in Columbia County, Georgia advanced a memorandum of understanding
07:15covering a data center project worth at least $17 billion. Among the largest private investments in the
07:23county's history, the counterparty is Kinetic Infrastructure Solutions, a subsidiary of Alphabet, and Google would occupy the
07:32campus. Roughly 23 buildings across about 1900 acres at the White Oak Park property. In Appling, county leaders are
07:42explicit about the goal, which is to use that revenue to eliminate the county's share of property taxes. Currently about
07:5040% of its
07:52budget, Google has committed to covering 100% of the energy infrastructure costs. And the site falls under a data
08:00center
08:00zoning district requiring 500-foot residential buffers, a 65-decibel noise cap and closed-loop cooling.
08:11Thanks for watching. If you found this useful, subscribe, leave a like, and drop a comment. It helps us cover
08:19more of these stories.

Recommended