Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 15 hours ago
The Caribbean Court of Justice has changed the way its judges will be assigned to panels, in the latest development following controversy over allegations of panel fixing at the regional court.

Under the new arrangement, all CCJ judges will sit on all panels unless formally excused for a legitimate reason. But the move is already drawing questions about how the decision was reached and whether it addresses the deeper concerns surrounding the court.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00A new system is now in effect at the Caribbean Court of Justice.
00:04The court says all of its judges will sit on panels unless a judge is formally excused for a legitimate
00:10reason.
00:10The three panel leaders will be the CCJ president and its two most senior judges.
00:17The court says the revised arrangement is intended to promote consistency, transparency and flexibility
00:23while supporting the efficient administration of justice.
00:26But according to the president of the Assembly of Southern Lawyers, Zaira Lackan, she says,
00:32quote, on its face, the revised arrangement appears to be a simplistic response to the serious,
00:37though disputed, allegation of panel fixing.
00:39The change comes against the backdrop of allegations about how judges were assigned to cases,
00:44allegations the CCJ president, Justice Winston Anderson, has rejected.
00:49But Lackan says the timing of the new arrangement raises questions about whether the reform
00:54was developed as a long-term institutional measure or in response to the controversy
00:59now in the public domain.
01:01She says, quote, it is therefore important to know whether there was meaningful consultation
01:06among the judges and whether proper administrative and efficiency assessments were undertaken
01:11before the change was implemented with immediate effect, end quote.
01:15The new system takes effect immediately with the court providing no transition period in its notice.
01:20Lackan says the success of the arrangement will depend not only on greater transparency,
01:26but also on how the judges themselves were involved in developing it.
01:31She says, quote, against the backdrop of concerns in the public domain about the allegedly heavy-handed
01:37imposition of internal practices, I sincerely hope that this decision was reached collaboratively,
01:43commands the consensus of the court, and represents a workable institutional reform
01:47rather than a temporary response to public controversy.
01:51She warns that changing the panel structure alone may not settle the questions that have emerged
01:57about the court's internal administration.
01:59Lackan says, quote, if, however, this was another unilateral decision taken without meaningful consultation,
02:05it is unlikely to resolve the underlying institutional concerns that have entered the public domain.
02:11For the CCJ, the revised system is now the mechanism governing the assignment of judicial work.
02:16For its critics, however, the issue is whether the new arrangement is the product of genuine institutional reform
02:23or simply the latest response to an escalating controversy.
02:27Lackan says, quote, transparency is essential, but so too are judicial collegiality,
02:32operational efficiency, and public confidence in the court, end quote.
02:36The CCJ says the revised panel arrangements take effect immediately.
02:39The court has not indicated whether further changes to its internal procedures are being considered.
02:45Arvishita Mwari Rupnarein, TV6 News.
Comments

Recommended