00:00It feels quite surreal to be having this conversation because I think, first of all,
00:03it's important to establish the facts. This was not my post. It was a collaboration from a
00:08photographer. It had 20 images and I just didn't look carefully enough and I accepted it. As soon
00:13as I was aware of what happened, I unaccepted it and took it down. I think it would be odd
00:19for the
00:20police to speak to me about that because I think it's quite obvious that I've not done anything
00:24wrong other than making an inverted mistake. Do you want to take this opportunity to apologise
00:28to Nigel Farage? Well, if I'd done it deliberately, I'd be apologising. But because this was a mistake,
00:33I think the important thing is that I point out it's a mistake, but I also make sure that I
00:37condemn
00:37political violence. And also, crucially, I make a commitment to be better on my social media.
00:41Okay. Do you want to apologise then or not? No. The reason for that is because Nigel Farage,
00:47when I posted this or when the person posted it, it got less than a thousand likes. Nigel Farage
00:52then took it, cropped it, so it made it look like I posted it, which I think was fundamentally
00:56dishonest. It's now had 3.2 million views. So actually, this whole conversation has been seen
01:03more because Nigel Farage, the Youssef, and I think Richard Tice posted it.
