00:09Transcription by CastingWords
00:30Bahagi na lang ng online press conference ni Vice President Sara Duterte
00:35ang ipinalabas habang nakasalang sa cross-examination
00:38ang testigo ng prosekusyon na si John Mark Calilong,
00:43senior agent ng National Bureau of Investigation.
00:46Ipinalabas nila ang bahagi kung saan umalma ang chief of staff ng BSE
00:51na si Atty. Zolaica Lopez sa plano noon ng kamera na ilipat siya sa Women's Correctional.
00:58To transfer me to the Women's Correctional in the dead of the night.
01:03I mean, bakit ganoon? Wala na bang rights yung mga tao?
01:07They just go to your room and then just get...
01:10My life is being treated.
01:14Dahil natakot ako, I feared for my life.
01:17Kasabay niyan ay ang paghimay ng depensa sa accuracy ng transcript ni Calilong.
01:22Gate ni Calilong, tama ang transcript.
01:25The press conference of VP Sara Duterte,
01:29that the transcription of the screen-recorded video
01:32of the press conference of VP Sara Duterte on 23 November 2024
01:38was faithfully transcribed by you.
01:41Yes, sir.
01:42She said,
01:42I am not leaving this room.
01:45I am a detainee here.
01:47Does your transcript have the words,
01:50a detainee?
01:51The part that the detainee is unaudible.
01:54Your Honor, please.
01:55Now, I am now registering my objection.
01:58How can it be relevant,
01:59assuming but not conceding,
02:01that these two minuscule words,
02:03detainee and accused,
02:05are not reflected in the transcript,
02:07when in fact this witness said
02:09he investigated not only on the basis of the transcript,
02:12but on the basis of the video that he himself viewed.
02:15Overruled part of CROSS to test the accuracy
02:17and the truthfulness of the witness in so.
02:20Sa CROSS examination,
02:22sinubukan ng depensa na questionin
02:24ang kredibilidad ni Calilong
02:26na naatasang mag-imbestiga
02:28sa sinasabing video
02:30ng pagbabanta.
02:32Tanong ng depensa,
02:34nagsampa ba
02:35ng reklamong kriminal
02:36ang Pangulo o sino man
02:38sa umano'y pinagbantaan?
02:40I have no personal knowledge.
02:43Did you really investigate this case?
02:45With your Honor, Your Honor.
02:45Argumentative, Your Honor.
02:47With your Honor.
02:47Did you really investigate?
02:48Sa pagtatanong ng depensa,
02:50sinabi rin ni Calilong na
02:52hindi kinuna ng NBI
02:54ng affidavit
02:55ang umano'y mga pinagbantaan.
02:57Ilang personalidad lang daw
02:59ang nakuna ng affidavit
03:01dahil nakita
03:02ang mga pangalan nila
03:03sa video.
03:04In your reports,
03:05did you characterize it
03:06as a conditional threat?
03:08Kasi kung hindi naman siya pinatay,
03:11the logical implication
03:12is that there's no threat
03:13against the...
03:14So I'm not saying
03:15it's not illegal,
03:17immoral
03:17to contract a killer.
03:19It wasn't a conditional
03:21in your mind
03:22because may kinausap na.
03:25Even with or without,
03:27it's still considered a threat
03:28as long as the...
03:29But your initial assessment,
03:31yung personal mo
03:31as an investigator,
03:33this is an investigation
03:34of the whole NBI
03:34but yung personal mo?
03:36The threat is absolute, sir.
03:39Pinresenta rin ng depensa
03:40ang ilang dokumentong
03:42nagpapakita
03:42sa ilang komunikasyon
03:44ng Justice Department
03:45at NBI
03:46kaugnay sa
03:47imbestikasyon ng kaso.
03:48The NBI investigated
03:50and filed the complaint.
03:52The DOJ directed
03:53the investigation
03:54and will determine
03:55whether the case
03:56should proceed
03:57to court
03:58and the alleged
03:59offended party,
04:00President Marcos,
04:02is the constitutional head
04:04of the executive branch
04:05exercising control
04:07over both the DOJ
04:08and the NBI.
04:09Okay, I withdraw.
04:10I withdraw.
04:11I withdraw.
04:11The ground is the ground.
04:12I withdraw.
04:13Oh, your honor.
04:14It's even more compound question
04:16asking several subject matters.
04:18Withdraw.
04:19Panay din ang pag-object
04:21ng prosecution.
04:22Sir, the NBI,
04:23of course,
04:23you're from the NBI,
04:24is under the Department
04:26of Justice.
04:27Yes, sir.
04:28Your honor,
04:28we can take judicial notice
04:29of that.
04:30Your honor.
04:33I'm on cross,
04:34your honor.
04:34I know,
04:34but there are things
04:35that may not be discussed.
04:37Your honor, please.
04:37Can I, your honor, please?
04:38Council,
04:39let's give him some latitude.
04:40The Secretary of Justice
04:41is meanwhile
04:42the head of the DOJ.
04:44Correct?
04:45Yes, sir.
04:46The Secretary of Justice
04:48exercises control
04:49and supervision
04:50over the NBI.
04:53Yes, but even...
04:54No more questions.
04:55The witness is answering.
04:57Yes, sir.
04:57No, Mr. Witness,
04:57if you know.
05:00Can you repeat, sir?
05:01Mr. Witness?
05:01The Secretary of Justice
05:02exercises control
05:04and supervision
05:05over the NBI.
05:06Yes or no?
05:08We are under, sir.
05:10But we're independent.
05:12So you do not know?
05:13Oh, your honor.
05:14That's argumentative.
05:15So you do not know?
05:17You claimed
05:17in your affidavit, sir,
05:19that...
05:21Affidavit of Investigation,
05:23that the NBI
05:23began its investigation
05:24into the VP's remarks
05:27because it was directed
05:28by the DOJ
05:29to do so.
05:31Motu proprio
05:31and directed, sir.
05:33There, okay.
05:35Do you understand
05:35what you just said, sir?
05:37Oh.
05:37Yes, sir.
05:38Can I object to that,
05:39your honor, please?
05:40I'm asking, sir.
05:41It makes sense, sir.
05:42Argumentative, counsel.
05:44Move on.
05:45Mutu proprio, sir,
05:46means...
05:47Oh, no.
05:48Objection.
05:48You cannot lecture counsel.
05:50This is cross-examination.
05:51You mentioned mutu proprio.
05:52What does it mean?
05:54Even without a complainant,
05:55we started the investigation, sir.
05:58Are you sure, sir?
05:59Oh, argumentative.
06:00Are you sure, sir?
06:02Move on, counsel.
06:03Are you sure, sir?
06:04Ilang beses na magitan
06:05ang presiding officer.
06:07The witness is not a newbie.
06:09I think he can handle himself
06:11and would know
06:12how to answer
06:13if indeed he's familiar
06:14or not
06:15with what is being presented
06:16to him.
06:17And thus far,
06:18he has responded
06:19based on his knowledge
06:20of these documents.
06:24Chair,
06:24Aguinaldo
06:25nagbabalita
06:26para sa GMA News.
06:30Kumpiyansa raw
06:31ang House Prosecution Team
06:32na hindi natibag
06:33ang kredibilidad
06:33ng testigo nilang
06:34si NBI Senior Agent
06:35John Mark Calilong.
06:37Yan daw ang dahilan
06:38kung bakit
06:38hindi na nila
06:39niredirect examination
06:40ng NBI agent.
06:41Si Calilong
06:42ang naatasang
06:43mag-imbestiga
06:44sa video
06:44ng pagbabanta
06:45umano ng visa
06:46sa buhay
06:46ni na Pangulong
06:47Bongbong Marcos,
06:48First Lady Lisa
06:49Araneta Marcos
06:50at Noy House Speaker
06:51Martin Romualdez
06:52kung ipapapatay raw siya.
06:54Ang Duterte Defense Team
06:55iwala rin
06:56nagawa naman nila
06:57ang layuning subukin
06:58at suriin
06:59ang kredibilidad
07:00ni Calilong
07:01na unang testigo
07:02ng prosecution panel.
07:05Ang sinasabi naman
07:06ay siya
07:07hindi expert
07:08but competent witness.
07:09In every cross-examination
07:10we always test
07:11the credibility
07:12of the witness
07:13to be able to
07:14determine
07:15if the witness
07:15is in fact capable
07:17of making the testimonies
07:18that he or she is making.
07:20Lahat naman po
07:21ng kanilang katanungan
07:22ay nasagot
07:24ni John Mark Kalilong
07:25from
07:27questions regarding
07:29his training,
07:31questions regarding
07:32the investigation
07:34he conducted,
07:36and questions regarding
07:37the threats
07:38which he investigated.
07:40In fact,
07:41ang last statement po
07:42ni
07:43Agent John Mark Kalilong
07:45ay
07:45yung threats po
07:47ay absolute.
07:48rute.
07:49Rute.
07:51Rute.
Comments