Skip to playerSkip to main content
Russian soldiers call them **"Silent Death"**—autonomous drones and ground robots that can strike even through heavy electronic jamming. In this video, we explore how Ukraine is using AI-powered weapons to overcome Russia's defenses, why these systems are reshaping modern warfare, and whether autonomous machines could define the future of combat. From battlefield innovation to the ethical questions surrounding AI weapons, discover why this technological revolution is changing war forever.

⏱️ CHAPTERS:
00:00 - Ukraine Silent Death Drones Counter Russian Jamming
02:25 - Ukraine AI Drones Hit 80 Percent Success Rate
04:51 - Ukraine Robotic Ground Vehicles Save 1000 Lives
09:21 - Mykhailo Fedorov Strategy Targets Russian War Casualties
13:02 - Ukraine Avenger Labs Trains AI on Combat Data
15:02 - Will Ukraine War Drones Become Fully Autonomous?

Support us directly as we bring you independent, up-to-date reporting on military news and global conflicts by clicking here: https://www.youtube.com/@TheMilitaryShow/join

#militarystrategy #militarydevelopments #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow

SOURCES: https://pastebin.com/Z4EgLfdK

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Russian soldiers have started using a chilling nickname on the battlefield, Silent Death.
00:05Not because it's fast, not because it's powerful, because by the time they realise
00:09it's there, it's already too late.
00:11Some units report hearing nothing until the final seconds, others never hear it at all.
00:17And unlike artillery, missiles or traditional drones, many of these systems can keep hunting
00:21even when Russia tries to jam, block or disrupt them.
00:25That's becoming a serious problem for the Kremlin, because the weapons spreading across
00:29the front isn't just harder to stop, it's getting smarter, and it's changing the way
00:34wars are fought.
00:35Enter the autonomous drones and robots, aka Silent Death.
00:40Now, to understand why Ukraine is betting on these machines that can essentially think for themselves,
00:46you have to understand the problem the machines were built to solve, electronic warfare.
00:51From early in the full-scale war, both armies flooded the front with first-person view drones,
00:56small remotely piloted aircraft carrying explosives, but a pilot steers directly into a target
01:02through a video link.
01:03They're cheap, they're precise, and for a time, they were transforming the battlefield
01:07in Ukraine's favour.
01:09But a drone that depends on a radio link is only as good as that link, and both sides quickly
01:14learn to attack the link itself.
01:16Jammers blanket the front, severing the connection between a drone and its operator.
01:20Spoofers corrupt satellite navigation, feeling the drone false coordinates or denying its GPS entirely.
01:27For a stretch of the war, those electronic defences were winning.
01:31A jammed drone is a failed drone, and along the most heavily contested stretches of the line,
01:36the majority of FPV missions were failing in the final seconds before impact,
01:40exactly where the jamming is more active.
01:43This is the bottleneck that artificial intelligence was brought in to break.
01:47The idea is straightforward, even if the engineering is not.
01:51If the drone can't rely on a human pilot and a live radio link all the way to the target,
01:56then give the drone enough onboard intelligence to finish the job by itself.
02:00This can be done by equipping it with image recognition software and visual navigation,
02:05so that once the operator points it at a target, it can fly the last stretch on its own,
02:10recognition of what it's looking at and correcting its own course even after the signal is cut.
02:15The decision making is then moved on to the drone itself, effectively making it immune to traditional jamming.
02:21The effect of that shift is measurable, and the numbers explain why every brigade in Ukraine now wants it.
02:27According to Katerina Bondar from the Center for Strategic and International Studies,
02:32who has studied Ukraine's autonomous systems, adding this kind of terminal autonomy to navigation and targeting,
02:38raises the success rate of a drone strike from somewhere around 10-20% up to roughly 70-80%.
02:45That's a 3-4 fold improvement, and it means that two AI-assisted drones can now accomplish what previously took
02:528 or 9.
02:53For an outnumbered military, that multiplier is the entire point.
02:57Every drone that hits is a drone you didn't have to build twice, a pilot you didn't have to risk,
03:02and a target you didn't have to send inventory to take.
03:05There is a second multiplier hidden here.
03:08Since the AI handles the hardest part of the flight, the skill required of the pilot drops sharply,
03:13and that matters enormously for a country fighting a manpower crisis.
03:17You no longer need a virtuoso operator for every single drone, and as autonomy improves,
03:22the ratio between operators and machines begins to shift from one pilot painstakingly flying one drone
03:29toward one operator launching many at once.
03:32Analysts tracking this trend describe it as an approaching inflection point,
03:36the moment when a single operator can send up to 20, 50 or 100 drones in one coordinated push.
03:43That's the moment the economics of the war change, because it deoccupies the number of strikes you
03:48can mount from the number of trained pilots you have. It's important to be precise here,
03:53because this is the part of the story that gets exaggerated.
03:56Ukraine hasn't really built armies of fully autonomous killer robots just yet.
04:01The use of artificial intelligence in weapons is arguably in its infancy.
04:05In mid-2026, it's most useful in target recognition, helping a drone pick out a camouflaged
04:11tank tucked into a tree line, and in guiding that final approach through a wall of jamming.
04:16For example, of the roughly 2 million drones Ukraine created in 2024,
04:21only about 10,000 had these AI enhancements, and even those still relied on a human to choose
04:26the target and start the mission. In 2026, the needle had moved on the production scale,
04:32with plans to end 2026 with 7 million annual drones. But there are no precise counts of AI-enhanced drones,
04:39suggesting that it's indeed a small minority of them out on the front line.
04:43Still, we can't discount the actual value of these drones. While the air war was being reshaped by
04:49intelligence, a parallel revolution was crawling along the ground.
04:53Robots Ukraine has poured resources into unmanned ground vehicles, robots on wheels or tracks that
04:59haul ammunition, evacuate the wounded, carry heavy weapons, and increasingly mount assaults of their own.
05:06And the Ukrainian soldiers operating them have learned something from their Russian prisoners.
05:10The Russians even have a nickname for these machines, Silent Death. That nickname points to a
05:16genuine tactical property, one worth slowing down to understand, because it explains why a slow,
05:22ungainly robot can be more terrifying than a fast one. On a modern battlefield, a soldier's earliest
05:28warning system is his own hearing. You hear the buzz of an approaching FPV drone, the engine of a vehicle,
05:34the whine of a motor. And that sound buys you the two or three seconds you need to drop into
05:38cover.
05:39A near silent ground robot deletes that warning entirely. According to reporting from CNN, embedded
05:45with Ukrainian units running these machines, Russian soldiers say they often cannot hear the robots coming
05:51until they're within about 10 meters. And a ground robot at 10 meters carrying a heavy explosive charge
05:57charge is already well inside its own blast radius. By the time you hear it, hearing it no longer helps
06:02you. There is no reaction window left. Now two things compound that advantage. The first is payload.
06:09A four-wheeled chassis can carry far more than a small aerial drone, whether that's a large explosive
06:14charge or a heavy machine gun with hundreds of rounds of ammunition. So that machine arriving in silence
06:20is also disproportionately more lethal. The second is the role silence makes possible. Infiltration.
06:27In one assault, the opening blasts from the first robots were used as a distraction,
06:32deliberately drawing attention while four other machines slip behind the enemy line,
06:36something no weapon that announces itself could ever do. The psychological toll is visible in the
06:41way defenders react. One Ukrainian commander, operating under the callsign Cyber, described deploying
06:47a robot against an enemy position and watching the Russians simply panic, crawling, pressing themselves
06:53flat against the ground with no idea how to respond to a threat they could neither hear nor locate.
06:58Silence strips a soldier of the two things he relies on most, his senses and his time. The hardware itself
07:05is notable here too. Cyber's unit fields a robot built around a heavy Browning machine gun mounted on
07:11tracks, wrapped in cameras that give it a wide field of view. It can sit hidden in foilage for days
07:16at a
07:17stretch, because unlike the men it replaces, it needs no food, no water, and never tires or cramps.
07:23The only thing that forces it back to base is ammunition, as once it has burned through its rounds,
07:28it has to return to reload. When interviewed, Cyber's unit was already preparing a faster successor,
07:34capable of moving at around 10 miles an hour and carrying small arms into battle. In a matter of months,
07:40these vehicles have gone from rare curiosities to something approaching standard issue, hauling supplies,
07:45pulling wounded men out of kill zones, and mounting attacks that once would have cost a platoon of
07:51infantry. That last point is where the ground robots connect back to the central logic of the entire
07:56Ukrainian strategy. One robotic strike unit of Ukraine's 3rd assault brigade, designated NC-13,
08:03ran the calculation on its own operations. Across 164 assaults, the unit estimated it would have needed
08:10roughly 2,300 infantry to achieve the same effect its robots delivered, and it would have expected to
08:16lose around half of them, dead or wounded, in the attempt. In the unit's own accounting, that means the
08:22machine saved on the order of a thousand Ukrainian lives. This succinctly explains why Kyiv is pouring
08:28everything it has into automation. Every assault a robot mounts is an assault a human didn't have to die in,
08:34and that matters since Ukraine started the war on the back foot. The scale of this shift is,
08:39by Ukraine's own account, enormous. In April, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy claimed that Ukrainian
08:45forces had carried out the first capture of a Russian position using robots and drones alone,
08:50with no infantry on the ground, and out of that since the start of the year, unmanned machines had
08:55conducted some 22,000 missions. Those are Ukrainian government figures, presidential claims made in a
09:01speech celebrating the country's defense industry, and they carry the natural caveats of any wartime
09:07announcement. But the broad direction they describe is corroborated by reporters on the ground and by
09:12analysts abroad, and it points to a war in which large parts of Ukraine's efforts are now genuinely
09:18unmanned. And sitting at the center of this transformation is the man Zelenskyy appointed to
09:23accelerate it. Mikhailo Fedorov is 35 years old, four months into his job as defense minister,
09:30and he's never served a day in the military. His background is technology, not tactics.
09:35He grew up in the steel city of Zaporizhia, the same city that's seen heavy fighting in the war.
09:40Got his start through the video games of his teenage years, built a digital advertising business
09:45before he'd finished university, and became a partner with Facebook, selling targeted ads.
09:50Zelenskyy first hired him to run social media for the 2019 presidential campaign,
09:55then made him, at the age of 28, the minister responsible for digitizing the Ukrainian state.
10:01When he moved to the defense ministry, he brought that world with him, a team of young advisors and
10:06data analysts in sweatshirts, a ping-pong table in the hallway, and the instincts of a man who sees
10:11the war the way a Silicon Valley founder sees an industry ripe for disruption. In the same way apps
10:17remade taxis and food delivery, Fedorov believes warfare can be remade by offloading the fighting onto
10:23machines. In an interview with the New York Times, Fedorov argued that the world needs security and
10:29only autonomous weapons can ensure it. He compared them to nuclear weapons, suggesting that countries
10:34that invested in automation were bound to win future wars. It's a vision of deterrence built not
10:40on warheads, but on algorithms. And it's worth stressing that this is a vision of where Fedorov wants
10:45to go, not a description of where Ukraine is today. The same article from the New York Times
10:50reiterated that AI and Ukrainian weapons was at that point mostly a matter of target recognition.
10:56The autonomous future is the aspiration. The camouflaged tank in the forest is the reality.
11:02Underneath the futurism sits a concrete strategy, devised by Fedorov and endorsed by Zelenskyy,
11:08and built to force Russia to the negotiating table. The New York Times reports that it's called
11:13air-land economy and it has three prongs. In the air, intercept at least 95% of incoming Russian drones
11:20and
11:20missiles. On land, kill or seriously injure more Russian soldiers than Moscow can recruit to
11:26replace them. And against the economy, strike the oil export terminals that fund the war. It's a
11:32strategy of attrition, but a deliberately engineered mathematical kind of attrition.
11:37Fedorov calls this phase of the war targeted destruction, and he's put numbers on the goal.
11:42By his account in the New York Times, Russia was losing somewhere around 35,000 to 40,000
11:47soldiers per month by mid-2026, and he aims to drive that rate above 50,000, a level he believes
11:54would halt the invasion altogether. This is combined with the systemic manpower bleeding
11:58that Russia has suffered. An estimate from British intelligence puts total Russian deaths between
12:03325,000 and 500,000. Ukraine's own general staff claims casualty figures close to 1.4 million,
12:11and while that can be disputed, the scale of casualties is such that Russia hasn't lost this
12:17many troops since the Second World War, and it's straining to replace them. This is the point where
12:22the opening math of the war comes full circle. It's tempting to say that the tables have simply turned,
12:28that Ukraine now outguns and outnumbers its enemy. That's not true. Russia still fields the larger
12:34military overall, with something on the order of 1 million active soldiers and several hundred thousand
12:39deployed in or near Ukraine. By most assessments, it has a raw numerical advantage on the battlefield,
12:44and has also closed much of the early gap in drone production, in some categories matching or exceeding
12:50that of Ukraine. But before we get there, make sure you're subscribed to The Military Show. We post
12:56daily videos that cover all the major events in global geopolitics. Now the actual version of the
13:02reversal is narrower and more interesting than a simple flip. The overwhelming advantage Russia held in
13:08February 2022 has been ground down to something far closer to parity. In the specific technologies now
13:14deciding the front, the unmanned systems and the intelligence guiding them, Ukraine has actually
13:19seized the initiative. A war that began as a contest of mass has become a contest of adaptation,
13:25and adaptation is the one field where the smaller country has consistently moved faster. That adaptation
13:31runs on an industrial base that looks nothing like a traditional arms industry. When Fedorov tours Ukraine's
13:38defense exhibitions, he moves through rows of weapons that look soldered and duct taped together in
13:43someone's garage, because many of them were. There are spools of fiber optic cable that let a drone be
13:49flown down a literal thread of glass, immune to jamming because it uses no radio signal at all. There are
13:55palm-sized surveillance drones, balloon-borne weapons, and unmanned ground vehicles that look like a table
14:00bolted to a miniature bulldozer. Everything has to be cheap and disposable, because on a front saturated with
14:07drones, a great deal of them will be shot down or blown up before it ever reaches a target.
14:12The genius of the approach is not any single weapon, it's the willingness to build cheaply,
14:17lose freely, and iterate fast. Fedorov has also turned the war itself into a source of data,
14:23which may prove to be one of Ukraine's most valuable long-term assets. The fighting has
14:28generated an immense archive of battlefield footage, a library of millions of annotated
14:33battlefield videos shot by surveillance and strike drones, including footage of how human beings
14:38behave in the final moments as a drone closes in. The Defense Ministry has begun opening these data
14:44sets to companies from allied nations so they can train their own artificial intelligence models on real
14:49combat data in a project called Avenger Labs. This is also a glimpse of a future in which the most
14:55valuable spoil of a war is not territory, but training data. But for all the momentum behind Fedorov's
15:02vision, it's run into something it can't simply disrupt, the Ukrainian military's own commanders.
15:07All of its futuristic talk of robot warfare has provoked real pushback inside the armed forces,
15:13to the point that analysts describe an open power struggle between the minister and the generals.
15:18The objection from the field is not that the technology is useless, but that the promised
15:22transition to unmanned battle is moving more slowly in reality than it does in Fedorov's speeches.
15:28That talk of empty battlefields fought by machines can feel disconnected from the actual war,
15:33which is still very much a matter of muddy trenches and broken bodies. But the picture is not even so
15:39one-sided. Ukraine's commander-in-chief, General Oleksandr Sersky, has continued to win battles using
15:45traditional combined arms tactics, armor and infantry maneuvering in the field, the methods that produced
15:51some of Ukraine's biggest victories earlier in the war. At the same time, many frontline brigades have
15:57embraced every technological edge they can get. The commander of the K2 brigade, an early adopter
16:02of FPV drones, praised having a young technology-minded defense minister who speaks the same language
16:08as the units, someone to whom they no longer have to explain anything. The reality of the war
16:13sits in the space between these positions. Not a clean choice between men and machines, but a messy,
16:19contested integration of the two. And it's worth remembering, underneath all of this,
16:23why the machines are being reached for in the first place. The robots are not a flex, but a response
16:29to exhaustion. CNN's reporting from the front mentioned two Ukrainian soldiers who had spent over
16:3511 months in frontline dugouts without rotation, hunted constantly by drones, at one point running out
16:40of sandbags to build the defenses that might keep them alive. One of them was walking 20 miles to safety
16:46at dawn, having not spoken to his wife in an earlier year, communicating only through recorded radio
16:51messages. These are the men the automation is meant to spare. The robots exist because there aren't
16:57enough of these soldiers, and because the ones who remain are being pushed past the limits of what
17:01human beings can endure. That's the engine of the whole revolution. Not enthusiasm for technology,
17:07but a shortage of men and an unwillingness to keep spending them. Which brings us finally to where Fedorov
17:13believes all of this is heading, and to the unease that trails close behind. In his vision, the kill
17:18zone, that miles wide strip along the front where anything that moves is hunted by drones,
17:24will eventually empty of human beings entirely. Machines will fight machines, in the air and on the
17:30ground. And the scale of human loss that defines this war will come to be seen as unsustainable,
17:35forcing warfare to evolve into something almost bloodless with the side that automates first.
17:40It's a seductive vision, and it's the logical endpoint of everything Ukraine has built. It's also,
17:46the New York Times was careful to note, the kind of vision that should give pause because wars rarely
17:51follow clean logic. They spiral in unpredictable directions, and taking human judgment out of the
17:56loop, handing the decision to kill to a machine acting on its own, could compound that unpredictability
18:02rather than tame it. Human rights organizations have drawn a hard line against weapons that select and
18:08engage targets without meaningful human control. And that line is exactly the one Fedorov's aspiration
18:14points toward crossing. For now, Ukraine is fighting an assisted war rather than autonomous one,
18:20using intelligence to stretch a smaller force across a longer front, and to make a bigger enemy bleed
18:25faster than he can replenish. And the tactic seems to be working, at least based on field reports of
18:31silent death that can't be stopped. But the true scale of Ukraine's drone innovation lies not in
18:37the front line, but in what it can achieve in long-range strikes. To learn more, check out this video.
18:42And finally, make sure to subscribe to The Military Show for more daily news.
Comments

Recommended