00:03Now, we are now in a world where things that make a person recognisable, identifiable,
00:08unique, can be copied, reconstructed, and made to perform. A voice can be cloned, a face can
00:14be recreated, a likeness can be used. These essentials can be stolen. Theft is not innovation.
00:22Now, in order to navigate a path between the promise and the peril of AI, we need consensual
00:29guardrails, not to inhibit technological progress, God forbid, but guardrails that evolve at
00:36scale and at the rate that the technology itself is evolving. Guardrails that protect our human
00:42rights. Trust must begin with consent. When an actor's likeness, let us prove in this moment
00:51that we are capable of harnessing transformative technology.
00:59Thank you, Ava, for that introduction and about markets or machines. At its foundation,
01:05technology, policy, lawmakers, regulators, companies, and rights holders, a practical structure
01:12for turning consent on innovation. A person can appear to say something that they've never
01:17said, endorse something that they do not believe, or questions that often, when technological
01:24progress isn't involved. Human consent is not an impediment to progress. Human consent does
01:32not diminish the struggles and the joys of technological innovation, or inhibit creativity.
01:38Yet, the conversations around this very key element are being sidelined at the moment. The AI
01:44conversation has become primarily one of profit maximisation and the desire for the control of
01:50its expansion.
02:20Their privilege is when the AI is not meant forowski. These mechanisms are a part of the
02:21peacemaker Example POP that we are currently have influencer people's customization."
02:21Now LumN figure is a part of the
02:21You
