Skip to playerSkip to main content
Representative Seth Moulton sharply questioned Admiral Brad Cooper during a tense congressional hearing over the ongoing crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. The heated exchange came after Cooper stated he had traveled through Hormuz “around a hundred times” and was “intimately familiar” with the strategic waterway.

Moulton then fired back with the question that went viral online: “So why is it closed?” The confrontation highlighted growing concerns over U.S. naval operations, rising tensions with Iran, disruptions to global shipping routes, and the effectiveness of Washington’s military strategy in the Gulf region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical oil chokepoints, making the hearing a major flashpoint in the debate over U.S. military policy, Trump-era pressure tactics, and Middle East security.


#Hormuz #BradCooper #SethMoulton #Iran #USNavy #Trump #MiddleEast #BreakingNews #Congress #USMilitary #StraitOfHormuz #WorldNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Admiral Cooper, you keep using the term significantly degraded.
00:07Last summer, we were told that Iran's nuclear weapons program was obliterated.
00:14Can you clarify the distinction between obliterated and significantly degraded?
00:20Congressman, again, I think appropriate to talk about anything regarding the Iranian nuclear program.
00:25No, no, no, I'm not asking you to talk about the Iran nuclear program.
00:27I'm asking you to talk about English language.
00:29What's the difference between obliterated and significantly degraded?
00:33Are they the same?
00:37Congressman, anything regarding the nuclear program?
00:39I'm not asking you to talk about the nuclear program, Admiral.
00:41I'm asking you to answer a question that applies to a lot of things beyond the nuclear program.
00:45You've also said that their ballistic missile program was significantly degraded.
00:48What does that mean?
00:50The specific numbers are best, as you know, from your own military experience.
00:54President Trump's own national security strategy, which he signed in December,
00:57five months ago, used the exact same phrase, significantly degraded.
01:01So if this was true back then, five months ago, then why did we start this war?
01:07Was he lying to us then?
01:12Congressman, from a military perspective, anything regarding the nuclear program?
01:16Admiral, are you familiar with General Westmoreland?
01:19I'm very familiar, Congressman.
01:21He's well known for talking about body counts.
01:25Now, when I think about you in this war, I always think about how you always got up there
01:28and would say everything's going according to plan.
01:31So let me just ask, Admiral, where was closing the strait in the plan?
01:38I'm happy to discuss the specific operational aspects.
01:42But did you just not anticipate that?
01:43Do you not think that Iran could do that?
01:46Or was that part of the plan here?
01:48Congressman, as the...
01:49For 250 years, the Navy has kept sea lanes open and free.
01:53Under every previous president, the Strait of Hormuz has been open.
01:57So why is it closed under your watch?
01:59Congressman, I've traveled through the Strait of Hormuz probably 100 times.
02:03I'm intimately familiar with it as a combatant commander.
02:06But why is it closed?
02:07If you're so familiar with it, did you not anticipate that Iran might...
02:10If I may answer the question, if I may ask with respect, with all due respect,
02:14my responsibility as a combatant commander is to lay out all the options,
02:17present those to the secretary and the president.
02:20They make policy-level decisions.
02:22So you presented the option...
02:23The operational aspect...
02:24So, Admiral, you presented the reality that Iran might close the strait
02:29to the president and the secretary of defense.
02:32Anything that I discuss with respect to...
02:35Okay, well, let's go back to the plan.
02:37Where was begging China for help opening the strait part of the plan?
02:44Sir, from a military perspective?
02:46There are multiple reports now public that Iran has already reconstituted
02:51many of its bombed-out missile sites.
02:53Was that part of the plan, too?
02:54Those reports are inaccurate.
02:56Okay.
02:57I will actually give you credit for regime change.
03:00I know that was part of the plan.
03:01You've replaced an 86-year-old in failing health with a fought while against
03:05producing nuclear weapons.
03:07With a more hard-line guy in his 50s, who, in case he wasn't hard-line enough,
03:11you killed his immediate family.
03:14Was that part of the plan?
03:15Is that the regime change you wanted?
03:18Congressman, we were given very specific military objectives
03:21to degrade Iran's power projection capability.
03:23That's exactly what we did.
03:25Okay, so in the course of doing that,
03:27you also lifted the oil sanctions on Iran,
03:30giving them about $14 to $16 billion.
03:34They can buy a lot of ballistic missiles for that.
03:37Was that part of the plan?
03:38Lifting oil sanctions on them in the course of the conflict?
03:41They killed 14 Americans, we lift oil sanctions on them?
03:46As you know, sir, the U.S. military does not lift sanctions.
03:48That's a policy decision.
03:49Okay, I'm just trying to figure out where it was part of the plan.
03:53On March 5th, you talked about how you built the most integrated
03:58air defense system in the Middle East,
04:01and yet, well into the war, you had to ask Ukraine for help
04:04with defenses against drones.
04:06That's not accurate.
04:08Okay.
04:09What about oil prices, gas prices?
04:11Was oil prices going up 56% part of the plan?
04:17Congressman, as you know, from a military perspective,
04:19we don't deal on oil and gas prices.
04:20I defer to the appropriate authorities within the government.
04:23Okay, so since none of this seems to be part of the plan,
04:26what's the plan now?
04:27What's the plan now to actually win this war?
04:30Because it feels like we're losing.
04:31We don't have a nuclear deal.
04:33We don't have the strait open.
04:36The president has called for unconditional surrender.
04:39Is that part of the plan?
04:40Congressman, we achieved all our military objectives.
04:42We're presently in a ceasefire.
04:44We're executing a blockade,
04:46and we're prepared for a broad range of contingencies.
04:48Well, it doesn't seem to be going well,
04:49and I would like to know how many more Americans
04:51we have to ask to die for this mistake.
04:53Do you know?
04:54I think it's an entirely inappropriate statement from you, sir.
04:57With all due respect, it's not a statement, it's a question.
Comments

Recommended