00:13The situation is in that they say all the truth.
00:17Why did they say all the truth? I don't have any idea.
00:20But that is a function of the Fiscalía,
00:22as the judge said in the accusation against Carlos Cárdenas,
00:27that they correspond to the Fiscalía to carry out all the necessary research
00:31to complete the truth of the facts
00:35from the testimony that they, voluntarily, decided to give.
00:44Well, that is what we expect.
00:46And it is not late for that situation.
00:50I believe that here, in some way,
00:53there is something of fear for many people
00:56that they have known.
00:58Because who knows the place where the facts happened,
01:03where they shot the shots to Luis,
01:05where they led him to his death,
01:07that is a very residential area.
01:17I don't believe, and at least in what has to do with our part,
01:21I don't know how or how to do it,
01:23because I think that there is from our part
01:29some economic benefit to them,
01:33what, how, how, how, I don't have any forms.
01:35Now, that it is from the other part,
01:39I don't know until that point,
01:41because according to what they have explained to me,
01:44think we only have the possibility
01:45that someone assume a responsibility
01:50of a crime that can reach
01:5440 or 50 years of prison,
01:56a change of what they have done.
02:07What do you think about the crime?
02:14What do you think about the crime?
02:15Well, people with antecedents.
02:18Well, no, not to know how to say like antecedents,
02:20but to point it out of a way,
02:22they had to have participated
02:25people who didn't have fear
02:27I am sure
02:29that Laura and Jessie
02:30didn't have the force
02:33to have dominated a Luis,
02:35a person athletic,
02:36sports,
02:39with an physical form
02:41physical information, that it was not easy for them to dominate.
02:46So, they, in a direct way, didn't give them the coups.
02:50That leads me to conclude.
02:53But if they do know who carried out that criminal action, I don't have a doubt.
03:02What is the case of the criminal action?
03:07There are two things that we have to separate.
03:10The fact that I know what happened was based on the tests that they have,
03:15is different from that they have to establish responsibilities.
03:19When you say, I know what happened, it refers to that?
03:22A that Luis lo killed.
03:24A that Luis lo killed.
03:25And that, with respect to the death of Luis,
03:28there are some people who have to respond to it in the circumstances in which it is.
03:33One, saying exactly what happened,
03:36because Luis didn't go out to eat a dog,
03:39he ran away and ran away and ran away.
03:41That story of Blancanieves,
03:43that is not true, and that is demonstrated.
03:46Here, the issue of our interest is not to be responsible for responsible for the one who is.
03:54Because we don't agree with that.
03:56Here we have to be responsible for the people who,
04:01in a certain way,
04:03and based on all the probatory elements that we have,
04:06we know that they have participated.
04:09Because the worst that can happen,
04:11that would be a double effect in our pain,
04:15is that we have to be responsible for people who have nothing to do with the death of Luis.
04:19Do not agree with that.
04:19Okay.
04:19The happy bird.
04:19and that they are something to do with the children.
04:19But that's because we're not afraid of what the children have.
04:19So, that's why the children have been a medical child.
04:19You
Comentarios