Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 weeks ago
Let's get more now on the government's long-awaited response on gambling advertising. With the prime minister announcing new measures such as limiting gambling ads on daytime tv. Sociologist David Rowe argues the changes don't go far enough.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:01I'm pretty underwhelmed, I suppose, like a lot of my colleagues who work in this field.
00:07I don't want to be too cynical, but it does seem after a thousand days since the Murphy
00:14Report brought down a series of recommendations to bring it and to advance it today when there
00:27are so many other issues that the government could have been pressed on.
00:33It seems like a bit of a distraction to me.
00:35Let's dig into the detail of some of these changes.
00:39One of them is that gambling ads will be limited to three per hour between 6am and 8.30pm with
00:45a complete ban during live sports broadcast during that time.
00:48What kind of impact do you think that will have?
00:52Not a lot, I'd say.
00:55I keep returning to the Murphy Report that Jevielman talks about, it's a cross-party
00:59report on online gambling, unanimously accepted 31 recommendations, and its main finding, recommendation
01:13number 26 was a phased running down, running out of all gambling, advertising in all media.
01:25For online, by the way, I should say.
01:28So it seems to me that people are using the terms like tinkering around the edges.
01:33It will have an effect.
01:35But compared to the kind of blockbuster recommendation which came through the cross-party report in
01:40June 2023 and all this time later, we're now talking about how many ads are you allowed
01:49to have and when and that kind of thing, whereas the elegant, you might say blockbuster solution
01:57for the Murphy Report was we don't have to have this discussion because it's not going to be
02:03on any media at all, anywhere.
02:05Why do you think the government hasn't gone as far as the Murphy Report was advocating for?
02:11Political caution, I think.
02:16The vested interests involved here are very considerable.
02:22And, I mean, this move was supposed to have been made, it's been watered down somewhat,
02:29but I think a more substantial move was supposed to be made before the last election and I think
02:34a calculation was made that it was not a good time to antagonise big sport, big media and big gambling
02:42at that time.
02:45You know, I won't say is there ever a good time, but I think there probably is because
02:49if you look at most of the research that's been done on this topic, there's enormous public feeling
02:57about being bombarded with ads.
02:59And it's not just about children and minors, it's also about adults.
03:05As I like to say, Australia is the gold medal winning country in the world for per capita
03:13losses of gambling, about $32 billion Australian per annum.
03:19The Prime Minister has argued that this is about striking the right balance.
03:23What more do you want to see here and do you think there is any scope for further action?
03:27Well, I think there is, and I would be very concerned if there was some kind of position
03:32by this government that there was nothing else that could be done, this is it.
03:37I don't think very many people who, public health people, people who work in the communication
03:44media field, gambling field and so on, I don't think they're very happy with this.
03:49So they want more, and I think it's time to go back to the Murphy report and revisit its
03:58much stronger recommendations for banning online gambling advertising in all media.
04:04David Rowe from Western Sydney University, thanks for your time.
04:07Pleasure, thank you.
04:10Bye.
Comments

Recommended