Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 months ago
François Picard is pleased to welcome former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Warning that the US is in the process of "turning its back on Europe", Rasmussen said that "Europe must take care of its own affairs". The former NATO chief conceded that "without the United States, NATO does not exist." However, he added, "we need a more European NATO; we need to strengthen the European pillar within NATO".
For Rasmussen, the future of European security depends on a structural transformation rather than incremental adaptation. This includes the strengthening of a distinctly European pillar within NATO, the development of autonomous deterrence capabilities, and a reconfiguration of defence production toward speed, scale, and technological relevance. At the same time, he highlights that the challenge is not only institutional but political and societal. Europe faces a deficit of decisive leadership and a lack of strategic cohesion, which undermines its ability to act in a rapidly evolving geopolitical environment. The response must therefore extend beyond military investment to include a broader mobilization of political will and public commitment. Ultimately, he contends that Europe must transition from a reactive to a proactive strategic actor, one capable of engaging in power politics with clarity, firmness, and autonomy. This requires abandoning illusions of permanence in alliances and embracing a more transactional and self-reliant posture in international affairs.

Visit our website:
http://www.france24.com

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English

Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/France24_en

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:09Two wars going on right now at Europe's doorstep.
00:13It's a pleasure and an honor to welcome the former Prime Minister of Denmark, former Secretary
00:19General of NATO, head of the consultancy Rasmussen Global, Andres Fogg-Rasmussen.
00:24So many thanks for speaking with us here at France 24.
00:27Pleasure to meet you.
00:29You're one of the keynote speakers here at the Paris Defense and Strategy Forum.
00:35Right now, that second war we're talking about started by a president of the United States
00:42who consulted only non-NATO member Israel, who has a pliant Congress, who has cabinet members,
00:50who wear dress shoes that he buys them even when they don't fit to show their loyalty.
00:57Is Donald Trump a dictator?
01:00No, Donald Trump is not a dictator.
01:02But he is pretending to be a strong man in line with President Putin and President Xi
01:09Putin.
01:10And basically, they are arguing the same way.
01:14So, I think our conclusion is now the United States is in the process of turning its back on Europe.
01:24So, Europe must take care of its own affairs.
01:28In the process of taking its back, now you, when you were the Secretary-General of NATO,
01:34you know, for the general public, Secretary-General of NATO, it's a facilitator in a suit and it's a round
01:40table.
01:41But you don't really realize until now just how much you're almost an employee of the United States
01:47because the U.S. has so much power inside of NATO.
01:52What happens to NATO if what you're saying is true?
01:55Well, without the United States, NATO does not exist.
02:00So, I still think NATO will remain the cornerstone of European North Atlantic security.
02:09But NATO must change its face and structure.
02:14We need a more European NATO.
02:17NATO, we need to strengthen the European pillar within NATO based on the coalition of the willing,
02:27which is now being formed under the leadership of France and the United Kingdom.
02:32Yeah, 32 members inside of NATO.
02:34You're saying France and the UK, non-EU member, but you're putting them top of the list there with France.
02:40Yeah, because even if the United Kingdom is no longer a member of the EU,
02:49the UK plays a crucial role when it comes to security.
02:54And we need to strengthen the relationship between the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe.
03:04So, I appreciate very much the joint French-British leadership of this coalition of the willing.
03:12What I would like to see would be a more rapid process.
03:19The coalition of the willing must not be the coalition of the waiting.
03:23Right. So, we know about the spending part.
03:25Each side asked to do more in terms of spending.
03:28We'll talk more about your native Denmark in a moment on that front.
03:32But then, is it also about, when you think of the UK, does it mean if the United States is
03:38turning its back on Europe,
03:39does that mean weaning itself off dependency when it comes to nuclear deterrence?
03:44Does it mean leaving that five eyes intelligence gathering a system they have with the United States
03:51and joining a European one instead?
03:53Well, I think we can still count of the American nuclear umbrella.
04:00But the fact that doubts have been raised about the American commitment to European security,
04:11that fact makes it necessary for Europe to consider how could we build a nuclear capability ourselves.
04:20And in that respect, I appreciate the recent speech by President Macron,
04:27who launched a new French nuclear strategy and extending, so to speak, the French nuclear umbrella
04:39to the rest of Europe. And I think that's a promising and necessary path.
04:45Would you share intelligence with the United States under the current circumstances?
04:51Yes, of course. But I think…
04:55Even if they're, for example, threatening to take over Greenland?
04:58Well, I think if the United States were to attack Greenland and by that a NATO ally, Denmark,
05:11that would be the end of NATO. But for the time being, they have backed off. So I think we
05:22should now
05:22concentrate on building the coalition of the willing, strengthening the European pillar of NATO,
05:32strengthening the nuclear deterrence. We need a European nuclear deterrence to deter a nuclear-armed
05:41Russia. And in that respect, I think the speech of President Macron was essential.
05:47Russia is still the top priority if you're European. Absolutely. I mean, after the Russian attack
05:57against Ukraine back in 2022, we are in a new security environment. And that takes a new security
06:06framework in Europe. We have to realize we are alone. We must stand on our own feet. For much too
06:20long,
06:21Europe has been dependent on cheap energy from Russia, cheap goods from China, and cheap security
06:30from the United States. That model doesn't work any longer. So a country like Denmark, which has all
06:38those U.S.-made F-35 jets, what do you do? That's not something where you can snap your fingers
06:44and overnight you have a different fleet. No. Of course, we will still have a close cooperation
06:50with the United States. We need that. But we have to strengthen the European capabilities. We have to
06:58expand the European production of weapons systems, military capabilities, ammunition. And also,
07:09when it comes to energy, we must reduce our dependency on external actors.
07:16And right now, you have this war, which is of Donald Trump's choosing, which is sending energy prices
07:23soaring. We're very worried about natural gas prices here in Europe. The question then is,
07:31what lessons have you learned in the last 25 days, when it comes to, for instance,
07:37a fire in a laundry room being enough to make an aircraft carrier turn around? When it comes to the
07:42fact that you have missile defenses, which might be running low in those Gulf states? What are the
07:48lessons you've learned in 25 days? I think we have learned several lessons. First, that the United
07:54States started this war without consulting European allies. Another testament to the fact that we own
08:03our own. Secondly, how important it is to build up stocks of military capabilities.
08:11We are producing too little, too slowly right now. And my third lesson is that we also need to prepare
08:23for
08:23the future warfare. We have to invest much more in high-tech military capabilities, drones,
08:34high-tech military warfare across the board, and not wait decades for the production of tanks, fighter jets,
08:48naval vessels, etc., etc. It's an old chestnut when you come to a forum like this one. Whether or not
08:54there's ever going to be a joint fighter plane made by France, Germany and Spain. Right now, the smart money
09:02says no. When it comes to, again, made in Europe, how fast can we go?
09:08Yeah, but we should go much, much faster. What is much faster?
09:12But we have to deploy military capabilities in a few months, not in a year's time, not to speak about
09:22decades. And I think our defense industries are much too slow
09:30in delivering the necessary military equipment, ammunition, etc. So instead of focusing on what I
09:40would call the traditional heavy military capabilities, we should be much, much smarter, much quicker by
09:49focusing on drones and other high-tech military capabilities. The fact is that the war in Ukraine has
09:59demonstrated how important it is to be at the forefront when it comes to high-end, high-tech
10:08military capabilities. In today's war in Ukraine, more people are killed by drones than by artillery.
10:16So it's election day in Denmark. And you have just recently raised the military service conscription,
10:26something that disappeared here in France a quarter century ago, from four to 11 months for
10:31both young men and women. How's that going? Should that be the norm all over the continent?
10:36Yes, I think so. We really have to mobilize our will. Do you see that will?
10:48I think the Russian attack against Ukraine and the election of Trump in the United States
10:56were wake-up calls. At least it should be wake-up calls for
11:00the whole of Europe. We need a new mentality. We need to infuse in the whole of the population
11:09the will to defend our freedom, our democracy, our way of life. And to that end, I think conscription
11:18is an efficient tool. Conscription all over the European continent, you're saying?
11:24Yes. Now, you began this conversation by saying how Putin is acting like Vladimir Putin, like Xi Jinping.
11:35My question then, when you look at the way the Europeans have to leverage it at this point in
11:43time, what leverage do they have? Because when the war fighting stops in Iran, at that point in time,
11:50will Donald Trump, if he feels like a wounded lion, turn on Ukraine?
11:58No, but I actually, I think we in Europe should learn
12:04to act in the same transactional way as Donald Trump. First, Donald Trump launched a war without
12:14consulting Europeans. Next, when he realizes that he is walking into big troubles, he asked the Europeans
12:24to help him open the Hormuz strait. I think we should have told Trump, okay, we are also interested in
12:34the opening of the Hormuz strait. But in exchange for helping you, you must help Europe. You should
12:41continue supporting Ukraine. You should abolish all threats. Who makes the call? Who calls up Donald Trump
12:49and does the face-to-face negotiation for that? I would add to this, you should abolish the terrorist threats
12:57against Europe. Who makes that call? Who's the one who calls Trump from Europe? Yeah, but
13:10I think strong leaders from big countries should make the call. The problem is, many of them are too weak
13:21right now. One final question for you. Again, if it comes to Donald Trump then turning on Ukraine after
13:28the war in Iran is over. The come to daddy, as the current Secretary General of NATO said last year,
13:35flatter Donald Trump, keep him on board. That's out the window, is what you're saying.
13:40I think time for flattering is over. Now we should stand up firmly to President Trump.
13:48Anders Fogh Rasmussen, so many thanks for speaking with us here at France 24.
13:52Thank you for having me.
Comments

Recommended