Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 hours ago
The high court has struck down new government measures to monitor people released from indefinite immigration detention. The regulations were supposed to replace an earlier regime for monitoring, thrown out by the high court in 2024.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:01The case was brought to the High Court by a Papua New Guinea citizen who argued he shouldn't
00:08have to live under a curfew or wear an electronic monitoring device.
00:12The man was in indefinite immigration detention after serving jail time for murder and family
00:19violence offences.
00:21After the High Court found indefinite immigration detention was illegal, the government had
00:27to release many detainees, including some who had committed serious crimes.
00:32A regime was set up in the name of public safety to monitor some in the group.
00:38But the High Court found curfews and ankle bracelets were a punishment that under the Constitution
00:44could only be imposed by a court.
00:47The government responded with a new framework to impose the monitoring, but that too has
00:53been rejected.
00:53The Immigration Minister Tony Burke has played down the loss, saying it's fortunate Australia
01:00has an agreement with Nauru to take those whose visas have been cancelled.
01:05But the Australian Lawyers Alliance says today's ruling is a win for the rule of law and that
01:12it's a message to governments to stay away from the role of the courts.
01:16Limited Lawyers
01:17348
Comments

Recommended