- 4 weeks ago
Tonight on The Cameron Journal Newshour, we're talking about all the hot news of the day. We have the situation in Iran, Minnesota and the on-going crisis over Greenland I also talk about how Ukraine tested whether intelligence was being passed from the US to Russia and they found that it had been. We watch a video where JD Vance absolutely tears apart globalization (I love it) and we explore the next news narratives coming along.
Category
đ
NewsTranscript
00:01:30I'm Cameron Cowan. This is the Cameron Journal News Hour.
00:01:33I got chit-chatting with Will from The Living Joke, and I did not set up all my links, but I'm almost done.
00:01:44There is so much happening in the world today.
00:01:49It's a little frightening, a little scary, but we're going to walk our way through it because there's so much going on.
00:01:57It's Greenland, it's Iran, it's Minnesota, it's everything. Twitter has been, ooh, it's been a fun day on Twitter today.
00:02:08Um, just every, you know, everybody freaking out about the potential end of NATO, if things with Denmark go the wrong way over Greenland, whether we actually need Greenland.
00:02:20It just goes on and on and on and on. Um, and on top of that, you have the, the Iranians calling for the return of the Shah, which, you know, I never thought would happen.
00:02:33Especially given our interview last week with Zolal Habibi, um, who talked about that they were not a lot of, um, uh, not, not a lot of, uh, a love for the Shah for obvious reasons.
00:02:46And, uh, that, um, that, that is, you know, uh, uh, a whole, a whole thing.
00:02:53So, um, we're, we're going to dive into, dive into that.
00:02:59It's also, you know, the, um, it, we're also going to get into, um, we're also going to get into a new article from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, um, talking about Pete Heggs as Christian Nationalist Crusade to remake the military,
00:03:15which is going on long before Mr. Heggs that came along, and that, uh, that's a whole, um, you know, a whole, a whole thing.
00:03:26Um, we're going to get into, um, we're going to get into a little video from Midas, touch about, uh, um, about what all, what Greenland all means,
00:03:40and, um, a big intelligence snafu that kind of also impacts the, uh, uh, uh, impacts the, uh, um, the NATO situation.
00:03:54Um, I even have a statement from Keir Starmer about that, because obviously Europe is freaking out.
00:04:01Um, we're going to dash through Davos real quick.
00:04:03I have a lot of stuff.
00:04:05I just have a lot of, a lot of things, um, happening.
00:04:10We may not really get to them all, um, sort of thing.
00:04:14But, uh, yeah, we're going to, we're going to have, we're going to have some fun.
00:04:19So, um, these All My Tabs aren't quite arranged the way that they need to be.
00:04:24But, um, we're going to, we're going to dive, we're going to dive right in.
00:04:28Um, before I do all that, though, I want to, one, remind you to subscribe to my newsletter, uh, CameronJournal.com slash subscribe, or CameronJournal.substack.com.
00:04:38And also, if you'd like to support this journalism, please subscribe to Cameron Journal Plus, which gets you into the private Discord, plus some other fun perks.
00:04:46And you can do that at CameronJournal.com slash subscribe.
00:04:49Thank you to all my Cameron Journal Plus subscribers who do support the journalism.
00:04:55And I appreciate that.
00:04:56I also, uh, social media, at Cameron Cowan on Twitter, which is a fun place to follow.
00:05:03I do, I post unique threads about different things, um, breakdowns of the podcast, all that type of thing.
00:05:09Uh, Facebook.com slash Cameron L. Cowan.
00:05:11I'm also Cameron Cowan on LinkedIn.
00:05:13Um, so you can follow me in all those, all those, all those locations.
00:05:17Um, before we get into the headlines, I have a personal note that I want to make.
00:05:22Um, today is Martin Luther King Day, um, as you might have seen.
00:05:26Um, and I received word this morning that my father, Wardell McGee, passed and went home to the Lord.
00:05:33Um, as we, as we would say, and he would say, um, this morning I received a call from family.
00:05:39Um, he was 79.
00:05:44Um, seven, um, no, I take that back.
00:05:4678, because his birthday wasn't until next month.
00:05:49Um, 78.
00:05:49Um, and, uh, he passed in Northport, Alabama, his home.
00:05:54Um, and, uh, he'd been having health issues for a while, so it wasn't unanticipated.
00:05:58And, um, although I was not there, I, I knew about it.
00:06:02And apparently he was, he was ready to go and he was ready for his health struggle to be over.
00:06:06Um, long time listeners of the podcast will know, I did not meet my father until I was 23 years old.
00:06:11And long time listeners of the podcast will also know that he and I had a difficult and distant relationship for the past 14-ish, 15-ish years, um, that we knew each other.
00:06:23But, um, the last phone call we had, he was in a rehab facility and we were talking about everything.
00:06:28And, um, the last phone call he had, he told me, I love you about five times.
00:06:33And at the time I thought it was a little bit corny.
00:06:35But as it turns out, it was the perfect final phone call for us to have.
00:06:38And so, um, I'm going to be passing this a little bit along to family and everything.
00:06:42But I wanted to, um, shout out my father.
00:06:46I mentioned it on Twitter this morning.
00:06:47Not that anyone would care.
00:06:49But, um, he, he, he, he didn't always express his love in the conventional way.
00:06:54But he loved to follow me on social media.
00:06:56He reposted stuff from the show all the time.
00:06:59He liked stuff from show, from the show all the time.
00:07:01Um, one of the times I got in the argument about racism on Twitter and I said, Jim Crow is a thing.
00:07:07There are people alive who live through it.
00:07:09My father lived through it and he's still here.
00:07:11And he actually commented and said, yep, still going.
00:07:14Um, which was really great and reinforced my argument.
00:07:17Um, so, uh, he, he loved interacting on social media.
00:07:22He loved basketball.
00:07:23He had a lot of interesting jobs.
00:07:24He was a snowplow driver for the city of Denver for years and years.
00:07:27He moved back down to Alabama in 2007.
00:07:30Um, he had a brief part in a movie as a doorman at one point.
00:07:34Um, he was a limousine driver for a while.
00:07:37Um, he was a semi-professional baseball player, um, for a lot of his, his adult life.
00:07:43Um, and, uh, and his moving up to Denver to kind of break out on his own was how he, uh, how he met my mom.
00:07:49Um, they had a short relationship, but not all the results were bad.
00:07:54So, um, so I, I just wanted to give him a special shout out.
00:07:58It's been weighing on me a lot today and it really shouldn't.
00:08:01We weren't that terribly close.
00:08:02Our relationship was brief in my 37 years of life and his 78 years of life.
00:08:09Um, but I did enjoy some of the wonderful times I had in Alabama with the family.
00:08:13I went down there for Christmas one year.
00:08:15I went on a couple visits down there and I was living in Seattle.
00:08:18It was a long flight.
00:08:20Um, it was a lot closer now.
00:08:22Um, and so, uh, so I just wanted to shout that out to everybody and, and let everybody know that there's been a little death in my, in my world.
00:08:30Um, death has been circling quite close lately.
00:08:34Uh, people who regularly watch know that I had a, a dear friend of mine passed last fall.
00:08:39Um, and so it seems like every couple of months I'm doing a memorial for somebody.
00:08:44Um, uh, oh, thank you.
00:08:47Someone in the comments.
00:08:48Thank you very much.
00:08:49Um, I, it seems that I spent a lot of time doing memorials, um, now, which is, um, really, really, really difficult.
00:08:59But I, I wanted to, to shout that out because it's been on my mind all day to day and I have not hardly been able to focus.
00:09:04I think I'm still processing.
00:09:06But I also come from people for whom the best way to get through grief is to begin working.
00:09:12So let's do that and dive into the headlines.
00:09:15Let me do this.
00:09:16Let me change to video.
00:09:19And let me get rid of this overlay, which was from last week's Living Joke Show.
00:09:24So, and I did not change the overload, uh, the overlays rather.
00:09:29Um, and we will, um, uh, begin right now.
00:09:35We'll dive into, uh, international news because we're going to talk about Venezuela and we're just going to, we'll just do that for an overlay.
00:09:43Okay, and let me get rid of those and get rid of those and move that over here and here we go.
00:09:49Um, oh, hello.
00:09:50Thank you for commenting, person on Twitch that says, yo, what's up, fat guy?
00:09:54I am very fat.
00:09:55Thank you for observing.
00:09:56I'm doing well.
00:09:57Let's talk about Venezuela.
00:09:58So, in the midst of the crisis in Greenland and everything else, we're still in the middle of the Venezuela situation.
00:10:10And, um, it, this post, Cory Booker was speaking out against this this morning and I thought this commentary was rather interesting.
00:10:19It says here, now they're including the Venezuela strikes in the narrative and not just Greenland.
00:10:24This is a shift.
00:10:25The words illegal, he said it out loud in writing.
00:10:29This is a new milestone being reached.
00:10:31They're not saying abuse of power or possible corruption.
00:10:34He's making a legal accusation.
00:10:36Legal.
00:10:36The words he's using and how he's using them are exactly how prosecutors talk about these types of crimes.
00:10:41He's laying a mens rea, which means why it happened, groundwork for establishing a criminal state of mind.
00:10:48He's laid out intent, enrichment, and concealment.
00:10:50Doing this sets the predication for hearings, investigations if there's time, and yes, impeachment.
00:10:55This is a signal, in my opinion, that they've fleshed out the violations of the law and had them legally reviewed.
00:11:02Language like this invites defamation unless it's true.
00:11:04The post definitely went through legal scrutiny.
00:11:07He's no longer saying if true or report suggests.
00:11:09I know it's excruciatingly slow for us, but in congressional terms, they're barreling towards impeachment as a ready option.
00:11:15And here's the reason why we're talking about this.
00:11:18There has been, especially today on Twitter, and even Instagram, a lot of people calling for the impeachment of President Trump.
00:11:26Who, you may remember, holds the record for most impeachments.
00:11:3150% of impeachments in U.S. history have been against Donald Trump.
00:11:35I don't think this dog hunts.
00:11:39And I'll tell you why.
00:11:41I don't think anybody, anybody, is in the mood to go through what happened in the first term.
00:11:48Um, that's not where the country's at.
00:11:51That's not where that is at.
00:11:53But, um, and the post from Cory Booker is here in short, and he says,
00:12:01After illegally and unconstitutionally striking Venezuela, Trump is now selling Venezuelan oil to a campaign donor
00:12:07and funneling the proceeds to an offshore accounting cutter,
00:12:10creating a potential slush fund with no accountability, oversight, or guardrails for Trump and his allies.
00:12:14His continued abuse of power doesn't serve the Venezuelan people or the American people,
00:12:18and certainly doesn't lower costs for Americans.
00:12:20This outrage is yet another example of his unchecked corruption as he again ignores laws
00:12:24and enriches his friends, donors, and himself.
00:12:27The part about this I definitely agree with is it is a narrative shift.
00:12:31I don't think it has much veracity beyond that.
00:12:35And I'll say, because no one's in the mood for it.
00:12:37And honestly, Democrats would have to knock it out of the park for the midterms in November.
00:12:42Supposing we even have elections.
00:12:44We're going to come back to that.
00:12:46Would have to knock it out of the park in November to get enough seats to even have a hope of being successful.
00:12:49And given that you need 60 votes in the Senate,
00:12:52and if everything goes right, they'll get a four-seat majority,
00:12:56they'll still need six Republicans to convict and remove.
00:13:02However, I think the focus needs to be less on impeachment
00:13:09and much more on Congress actually taking the time to restrict the power of the president.
00:13:14That would be a far, far better option.
00:13:16I'm not any happier about the strike in Venezuela than everyone else.
00:13:20Although I am happy that Maduro was gone.
00:13:21I'm just not happy with the way it happened.
00:13:23But no one's sad to see the back of Nicolas Maduro.
00:13:27Let's be clear about that.
00:13:29And the people saying that, oh, well, we should let...
00:13:31No, no, no, no.
00:13:32The world's a better place for being rid of Nicolas Maduro.
00:13:36But the way in which it was done is not great.
00:13:39Congress should work on that, not on impeachment.
00:13:42However, I think this is a very interesting...
00:13:44I do agree with this person.
00:13:46I think it is a very interesting narrative shift.
00:13:49And I think there's definitely a certain case being made.
00:13:51But I don't think it leads to impeachment.
00:13:54Moving right along.
00:13:56So, this post is rather interesting because it gets into alliance systems.
00:14:02And before we do that, I want to...
00:14:07Let's listen to Keir Starmer talk about Greenland before we dive into that post.
00:14:13Let's do this.
00:14:14He's a close ally of the United Kingdom and of the United States.
00:14:18A proud NATO member that has stood shoulder to shoulder with us,
00:14:24including at real human cost in recent decades.
00:14:27Alliances endure because they're built on respect and partnership, not pressure.
00:14:37That is why I said the use of tariffs against allies is completely wrong.
00:14:45It is not the right way to resolve differences within an alliance.
00:14:50Nor is it helpful to frame efforts to strengthen Greenland's security
00:14:56as a justification for economic pressure.
00:15:01Such measures hurt British workers, British businesses, and the British economy.
00:15:09And that is why I've been so clear on this.
00:15:11He's a close ally of the United Kingdom.
00:15:14It's kind of cut off at the beginning, but he's talking about Denmark.
00:15:17So, the reason why I picked that is because it was quite, you know,
00:15:22with everything going on between the Transatlantic Partnership and Greenland,
00:15:27we've had, you know, multiple statements.
00:15:30This one is from Keir Starmer, and I wanted to start with that first
00:15:32because this post is a bit disingenuous, and it's really the first part.
00:15:39It says here,
00:15:39Nobody can tell me what a, quote, alliance, unquote, actually is.
00:15:44I've literally seen supposedly in touch and educated Europeans say things like
00:15:48if NATO collapses, Europe will rearm and manage its own defense within 10 years.
00:15:53If you need 10 years to rearm, you aren't in a defense alliance.
00:15:56You are a free rider outsourcing your defense requirements.
00:15:59I've seen criticism from Europeans that if only the U.S. was determined,
00:16:02we could have kicked Russia out of Ukraine,
00:16:03as Europe only recently started providing any military support
00:16:06and still expects the U.S. to handle everything.
00:16:08That's not an alliance.
00:16:10That's a free riding problem.
00:16:12Until anyone can seriously answer, number one,
00:16:14what are shared threats we agree upon,
00:16:16and two, how we will burden share responsibilities equitably,
00:16:19there is no alliance that is a free rider and service provider.
00:16:23Okay.
00:16:25The rest of it is not important.
00:16:28This is what's important.
00:16:31So remember Keir Starmer just said,
00:16:34not using Terrors Against Alliance and Partners,
00:16:36alliances are built in trust, all this type of thing.
00:16:38There's a very specific reason we have disincentivized Europe from rearming.
00:16:47Let's open the history book together.
00:16:48In the 20th century, before 1950,
00:16:53Europe managed to have two world wars
00:16:56that killed 100 million people
00:16:59on almost every inhabited continent on this planet.
00:17:02And after 1945, some very smart people said,
00:17:06hmm, maybe we should take the guns away from the people conducting all the wars.
00:17:14Not just the Germans, everyone.
00:17:19And so, Europe did not necessarily rearm a whole lot after World War II.
00:17:26Now, admittedly, early in the Cold War, Europe was more armed.
00:17:32Some countries, like the UK, like France,
00:17:35mostly because they had overseas colonial possessions,
00:17:39needed to retain certain capabilities,
00:17:41and their economies were large enough to do so.
00:17:44Germany was disincentivized just from rearming.
00:17:47Most of Eastern Europe was under Soviet control by about 1952.
00:17:50And in Western Europe, you had a handful of countries
00:17:55who could basically hold off the Soviets long enough for America to arrive.
00:18:02Especially during the Cold War,
00:18:05there was a fear that without Western Europe
00:18:08being able to ably defend itself in an emergency,
00:18:12waiting for the U.S. to more fully arrive with more assets,
00:18:15that that was sort of good enough.
00:18:17At the end of the Cold War in 1991,
00:18:22there was mass disarmament around the world.
00:18:26The United States and Russia reduced arms as part of treaties,
00:18:30especially nuclear weapons around,
00:18:31which all of those treaties have now expired,
00:18:33but at the time we had a handful of nuclear nonproliferation treaties,
00:18:37and that had required a certain amount of disarmament.
00:18:39Europe, especially Western Europe,
00:18:41especially reduced spending on arms following the Cold War.
00:18:45And that has left some countries like Spain,
00:18:49post-Franco Spain,
00:18:50Portugal,
00:18:51Italy,
00:18:52Germany,
00:18:54South Central Europe,
00:18:55without a lot of military spending.
00:18:57Eastern Europe hadn't had military spending
00:18:59because most of them were part of the Warsaw Pact,
00:19:01or part of the USSR,
00:19:02and there were a variety of security agreements.
00:19:05Some countries,
00:19:05looking at you,
00:19:06Romania,
00:19:06overspent on the military,
00:19:08like the rest of the Soviet Union.
00:19:09Other parts were under more direct control
00:19:11and did not at all,
00:19:12like Ukraine.
00:19:12In the collapse of the Soviet Union,
00:19:15all of this was negotiated.
00:19:16The reason Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons
00:19:18was part of a security guarantee by Russia and the United States,
00:19:21which obviously Russia violated in 2022.
00:19:25So,
00:19:25there's a reason,
00:19:28so,
00:19:28the reason why NATO exists
00:19:30is,
00:19:31was to originally counter the Soviet threat.
00:19:34The second reason it existed
00:19:36was to help
00:19:37aid in common and mutual defense
00:19:40across all allies.
00:19:43Just because Europe doesn't have
00:19:44a lot of high troop counts
00:19:45or a lot of high plane counts
00:19:46or doesn't spend a lot on GDP
00:19:48doesn't mean they're not helping.
00:19:50That being said,
00:19:52Europe has been a bit of a free rider
00:19:54because successive presidential administrations
00:19:57have tried to get Europe
00:19:58to meet the 5% GDP minimum target
00:20:01for spending on defense.
00:20:03Because the U.S.
00:20:04or the,
00:20:04yeah.
00:20:05So,
00:20:05and because the U.S.
00:20:06has always had a large military budget
00:20:08and our military industrial complex
00:20:10likes to get paid,
00:20:10we obviously have always had
00:20:12this sort of outsized,
00:20:13you know,
00:20:14military budget
00:20:14because until very recently
00:20:16we wanted to be able to deploy
00:20:17forces anywhere on the planet
00:20:19at any time within 72 hours.
00:20:21We invaded in Afghanistan
00:20:22in three weeks.
00:20:24That was the attitude
00:20:25of,
00:20:26of,
00:20:26of the time.
00:20:27In a post-Cold War environment,
00:20:29there was not until very recently
00:20:31a huge reason for Europe
00:20:32to rearm.
00:20:34That does not necessarily mean
00:20:35an alliance is weaker.
00:20:37There are other NATO countries
00:20:39with capable militaries.
00:20:40There are other NATO countries
00:20:41that could serve as that stopgap
00:20:43in the event of,
00:20:46of some sort of,
00:20:47of some sort of Russian,
00:20:48Russian action.
00:20:49I think the implication
00:20:50that an alliance only works
00:20:53when everyone is pulling their fair weight
00:20:56isn't necessarily incorrect,
00:20:58but it's not,
00:20:59it's not by accident.
00:21:01A lot,
00:21:01some of the security protocols
00:21:03were quite intentional.
00:21:04And one of the intentions
00:21:06was to prevent
00:21:07another land war in Europe.
00:21:09Because again,
00:21:10we'd done such a good job
00:21:12with the first two.
00:21:14That,
00:21:14that was part of the problem.
00:21:15Now,
00:21:16geopolitics have changed.
00:21:18A lot.
00:21:19During the globalization era,
00:21:21which I think we can say
00:21:22is over,
00:21:23there was even less incentive
00:21:25because the U.S.
00:21:26was patrolling the oceans.
00:21:27So were the British,
00:21:28so were the French.
00:21:29But the U.S.
00:21:29only was patrolling the oceans.
00:21:30Trade was open.
00:21:31And there was this idea
00:21:32that the world's problems
00:21:33could be solved through trade,
00:21:35through negotiation,
00:21:36through diplomacy.
00:21:37This was an area where Europe,
00:21:38especially via the EU,
00:21:40once the EU became
00:21:41its own organization,
00:21:43excelled at a great deal.
00:21:47And,
00:21:47and,
00:21:47and then also denies the fact
00:21:48that we are the,
00:21:49one of the few,
00:21:50we're the only nation
00:21:51who's used the Article 5
00:21:53defense protocol of NATO
00:21:55to ask all NATO countries
00:21:56to contribute to our war
00:21:57in Afghanistan.
00:21:58Everybody was there.
00:21:59The Germans,
00:22:00the Danes,
00:22:01the French,
00:22:01the British,
00:22:02all this sort of thing.
00:22:03Britain lost tens of thousands
00:22:05of soldiers
00:22:06in Iraq and Afghanistan
00:22:08fighting alongside us.
00:22:09Same for Canada,
00:22:10same for a lot of other partners.
00:22:12Just because they're not
00:22:13spending a trillion dollars
00:22:14a year on the military
00:22:14doesn't mean they're
00:22:15layabouts and louses.
00:22:16Also,
00:22:16these countries have oftentimes
00:22:17opened their lands
00:22:19to military bases
00:22:20with all the associated problems,
00:22:22ask Japan about Okinawa,
00:22:24with the associated difficulties
00:22:25with that so that we could
00:22:26project power globally.
00:22:30Our ability
00:22:31to protect countries
00:22:32has been a huge
00:22:33diplomatic chip.
00:22:35It has been
00:22:36the paperweight
00:22:37that has ensured
00:22:39world peace
00:22:40for 80 years.
00:22:44As one one posted today,
00:22:45if you thought paying
00:22:46for the liberal world order
00:22:47was expensive,
00:22:48wait till you pay
00:22:48for what's next.
00:22:50An alliance
00:22:51is a deterrent.
00:22:53An alliance
00:22:54is an agreement.
00:22:54An alliance
00:22:56does not necessarily
00:22:57mean
00:22:58checking the accounts
00:23:00to see who's spent what.
00:23:01Sometimes it is,
00:23:03but that's not
00:23:04necessarily
00:23:05the be-all,
00:23:06end-all
00:23:06of what an alliance means.
00:23:08And that is
00:23:10an important thing
00:23:12to remember.
00:23:14And that's,
00:23:16there's a lot of,
00:23:17a lot of
00:23:20misunderstanding,
00:23:23I think,
00:23:23bad information
00:23:24about how these things
00:23:25really,
00:23:26really,
00:23:27really work.
00:23:28And that,
00:23:29that is
00:23:30perfectly demonstrated
00:23:31by
00:23:32this post
00:23:33and
00:23:34how
00:23:34different things
00:23:36are happening
00:23:36in geopolitics.
00:23:38and that's,
00:23:40that's
00:23:42extremely prescient,
00:23:43especially given
00:23:44this video,
00:23:46which is Emmanuel Macron
00:23:47talking about
00:23:49a major
00:23:50intelligence leak
00:23:51between
00:23:52the United States,
00:23:54Ukraine,
00:23:55and Russia.
00:23:56So,
00:23:57I love the
00:23:57Krasenstein Brothers.
00:23:58It says here,
00:23:59a French media report
00:23:59says Ukrainian intelligence
00:24:01stopped sharing
00:24:01high-value intelligence
00:24:02with the U.S.
00:24:03after concluding
00:24:04American leaks
00:24:05were reaching Moscow,
00:24:06citing a severe breakdown
00:24:07of trust during
00:24:07the Trump administration.
00:24:08The claim is attributed
00:24:09to senior Ukrainian
00:24:10intelligence leaders.
00:24:11Between this
00:24:12and the Greenland mess,
00:24:13can we just impeach
00:24:14Trump already?
00:24:14See what I mean?
00:24:15Everyone's got that
00:24:16on the brain.
00:24:17Not a thing.
00:24:18Anyway,
00:24:18I don't know
00:24:19if this is in English
00:24:20or not.
00:24:20If not,
00:24:21I will translate.
00:24:25OĂš l'Ukraine
00:24:25ĂŠtait ĂŠminemment
00:24:26dĂŠpendante
00:24:27des capacitĂŠs
00:24:28de renseignement
00:24:29amĂŠricaines
00:24:30Ă une ĂŠcrasante
00:24:32majoritĂŠ
00:24:32il y a un an.
00:24:34Aujourd'hui,
00:24:35les deux tiers
00:24:36sont fournies
00:24:36par la France.
00:24:37Les deux tiers.
00:24:37Alors cette dĂŠclaration
00:24:40n'est passĂŠe
00:24:41un petit peu
00:24:41une personne.
00:24:42Okay,
00:24:42he's talking about
00:24:43going to the U.S.
00:24:44to negotiate
00:24:45about Ukraine.
00:24:46That's not
00:24:47necessarily hugely
00:24:48important.
00:24:49They're going to get
00:24:49into the intelligence
00:24:50thing right now,
00:24:51but it's in French.
00:24:52You won't watch
00:24:52the whole thing.
00:24:53Krasenstein had
00:24:54the most important part.
00:24:55He was talking
00:24:56about his upcoming
00:24:56trip to the United States
00:24:57to negotiate
00:24:57about Ukraine,
00:24:58which is fine.
00:25:00So there's so much
00:25:04else going on today.
00:25:05This should be a much
00:25:06bigger story than it is.
00:25:09Basically, what had
00:25:10happened, I had read
00:25:11in other reports,
00:25:12is that the French
00:25:13and the Ukrainians
00:25:14decided to see
00:25:15how much intelligence
00:25:17or if intelligence
00:25:18about Ukraine
00:25:19was reaching Moscow.
00:25:20they fed fake
00:25:22information
00:25:22through to
00:25:24the Trump
00:25:25administration,
00:25:26found out about it
00:25:27on the other side,
00:25:28and concluded
00:25:28that, yes,
00:25:30that was
00:25:31definitely
00:25:31happening.
00:25:34And this was all
00:25:35exposed
00:25:36in this
00:25:38report.
00:25:42And that's
00:25:45how we
00:25:45that's
00:25:47a troubling
00:25:48thing,
00:25:49but the
00:25:50result of this,
00:25:51and I don't
00:25:52think I have
00:25:53any stories
00:25:53in here about
00:25:54this,
00:25:55but the result
00:25:56has been
00:25:56a lot of
00:25:58new people
00:25:59bringing up
00:26:00Trump's ties
00:26:01to Russia
00:26:01and the
00:26:02Russia hoax.
00:26:04That was never
00:26:04really a hoax,
00:26:05but that's a whole
00:26:06other conversation.
00:26:07Anyway,
00:26:07the whole Trump
00:26:08is a Russian
00:26:09intelligence asset
00:26:10has gotten brought
00:26:11up again in a big
00:26:12way.
00:26:12People are reposting
00:26:13articles.
00:26:14People are pointing
00:26:14at it again.
00:26:15All this type of
00:26:16thing.
00:26:17I don't necessarily
00:26:18know if that
00:26:19does or does
00:26:19not apply to
00:26:20Trump specifically.
00:26:21There's evidence
00:26:22for, there's
00:26:22evidence against.
00:26:25The only people
00:26:26who know that
00:26:26for sure
00:26:27work in
00:26:27Moscow.
00:26:29However,
00:26:29this is
00:26:30troubling
00:26:30simply because
00:26:31if Ukraine
00:26:33cannot trust
00:26:34their biggest
00:26:35ally who's
00:26:37applying material
00:26:37support,
00:26:39then Ukraine
00:26:39is in very
00:26:40deep trouble.
00:26:41Also,
00:26:42the fact that
00:26:44they're not
00:26:44providing us
00:26:45a high level
00:26:45intelligence
00:26:46anymore makes
00:26:46it a lot
00:26:47harder for
00:26:47our assets
00:26:48on the ground
00:26:49and yes,
00:26:50we do have
00:26:50assets on the
00:26:51ground in
00:26:51Ukraine,
00:26:52it's a lot
00:26:52harder for them
00:26:53to become a
00:26:53part of the
00:26:54fight and
00:26:54operate effectively
00:26:55either.
00:26:57Minus the fact
00:26:58this is a
00:26:59betrayal.
00:26:59Now,
00:27:00when we think
00:27:00about those
00:27:02thoughts about
00:27:02trust,
00:27:03those thoughts
00:27:04about being
00:27:05able to trust
00:27:06alliance partners,
00:27:07all this type
00:27:08of thing,
00:27:08if you can't
00:27:08trust your
00:27:09friend,
00:27:09do you want
00:27:10to hang out
00:27:10with your
00:27:11friend?
00:27:11If the
00:27:12United States
00:27:12becomes
00:27:13untrustworthy,
00:27:15which it's
00:27:17hard to think
00:27:18of it any
00:27:18other way
00:27:18after today,
00:27:20it will have
00:27:22devastating
00:27:23geopolitical
00:27:25consequences.
00:27:30If there is
00:27:33a big
00:27:33pullback,
00:27:35the EU
00:27:35even threatened
00:27:36to stop
00:27:36trading with
00:27:37the United
00:27:38States over,
00:27:39if tariffs
00:27:40implemented over
00:27:41Greenland,
00:27:42Europe is
00:27:43our second
00:27:43biggest trading
00:27:44partner after
00:27:44Mexico,
00:27:45and for those
00:27:46of you wondering
00:27:47what do we get
00:27:48important from
00:27:48Europe,
00:27:49insulin,
00:27:5074% of
00:27:51insulin is
00:27:51manufactured in
00:27:52Denmark
00:27:52specifically.
00:27:55It would
00:27:55take us a
00:27:56year and a
00:27:56half to
00:27:57replace that
00:27:57production
00:27:57capacity.
00:27:59Millions
00:27:59would die
00:28:00in insulin
00:28:01shortages,
00:28:02including
00:28:02children.
00:28:04So,
00:28:04just things
00:28:05to bear in
00:28:06mind as
00:28:07the trust
00:28:08with our
00:28:09alliance partners
00:28:10begins to
00:28:10break down
00:28:11ever so
00:28:12slowly,
00:28:12and it
00:28:13appears that
00:28:14the White
00:28:14House,
00:28:15or at least
00:28:15the Trump
00:28:15administration,
00:28:16somebody,
00:28:17is leaked to
00:28:17Moscow for
00:28:18high-level
00:28:18Ukraine
00:28:19intelligence.
00:28:22One of the
00:28:24big stories
00:28:25today,
00:28:26this is the
00:28:26New York
00:28:27Times live
00:28:28update,
00:28:29is about
00:28:30the text
00:28:31message that
00:28:33Trump said
00:28:34to the
00:28:34president of
00:28:35Norway,
00:28:36and it
00:28:39says here
00:28:40that President
00:28:40Trump is
00:28:41now claiming
00:28:42that one
00:28:42reason he's
00:28:43pushing to
00:28:43acquire
00:28:44Greenland is
00:28:45that he
00:28:45didn't win
00:28:45the Nobel
00:28:46Prize.
00:28:49And that
00:28:50might sound
00:28:51odd,
00:28:52but it
00:28:54would sound
00:28:55weird,
00:28:57except it's
00:28:59real.
00:28:59according to
00:29:02a text
00:29:02message he
00:29:03sent to
00:29:03Norway's
00:29:03Prime
00:29:03Minister
00:29:04over the
00:29:04weekend.
00:29:05Jonas
00:29:05Garstor,
00:29:06Norway's
00:29:07leader,
00:29:07received the
00:29:07text message
00:29:08on Sunday,
00:29:09an official in
00:29:10the Prime
00:29:10Minister's
00:29:10office said
00:29:10on Monday,
00:29:11quote,
00:29:12considering your
00:29:13country decided
00:29:14not to give
00:29:14me the Nobel
00:29:15Peace Prize
00:29:15for having
00:29:16stopped eight
00:29:16wars plus,
00:29:17I no longer
00:29:18feel an
00:29:18obligation to
00:29:19think purely
00:29:19of peace,
00:29:20although it
00:29:21will always
00:29:21be predominant,
00:29:22but now can
00:29:23think about what
00:29:23is good and
00:29:24proper for the
00:29:24United States
00:29:25of America.
00:29:26Mr.
00:29:26Trump wrote
00:29:27in the
00:29:27message,
00:29:27which was first
00:29:28published by
00:29:28PBS,
00:29:29Mr.
00:29:30Trump also
00:29:30questioned
00:29:31Denmark's
00:29:31claim to
00:29:32Greenland,
00:29:32saying,
00:29:33quote,
00:29:33there are
00:29:33no written
00:29:34documents,
00:29:34and adding,
00:29:35the world
00:29:35is not secure
00:29:36unless we have
00:29:36complete and
00:29:37total control
00:29:37of Greenland,
00:29:38thank you.
00:29:39The tensions
00:29:40over Greenland
00:29:40have sharply
00:29:41escalated in
00:29:41the last week,
00:29:42and the message
00:29:43injected a new
00:29:43level of
00:29:44uncertainty into
00:29:45Mr.
00:29:45Trump's thinking
00:29:45in his campaign
00:29:46to gain control
00:29:47of the island.
00:29:48Greenland has
00:29:48been a part of
00:29:49the Danish
00:29:49Kingdom for
00:29:49more than
00:29:50300 years,
00:29:51and world
00:29:51leaders have
00:29:52condemned
00:29:52Mr.
00:29:52Trump's
00:29:53insistence
00:29:53that the
00:29:53United States
00:29:54take over
00:29:54the territory,
00:29:55a giant
00:29:55ice-bound
00:29:56island in
00:29:56the Arctic
00:29:57region.
00:29:57According to
00:29:58copies of
00:29:58the message
00:29:59provided by
00:29:59the Norwegian
00:30:00Prime Minister's
00:30:00office,
00:30:01Mr.
00:30:01Trump's
00:30:01message was
00:30:02in a response
00:30:02to one that
00:30:03Mr.
00:30:03Storrs sent
00:30:04to Trump
00:30:04on Sunday.
00:30:05It was
00:30:05co-signed
00:30:05by the
00:30:06president of
00:30:06Finland,
00:30:07Alexander
00:30:07Stubb,
00:30:08a leader
00:30:08with whom
00:30:08Mr.
00:30:09Trump is
00:30:09close.
00:30:10The European
00:30:11leaders asked
00:30:11to speak
00:30:12to Mr.
00:30:12Trump about
00:30:13Greenland and
00:30:13his threat
00:30:14of using
00:30:14tariffs to
00:30:14pressure
00:30:15Denmark
00:30:15into selling
00:30:15it,
00:30:16which Denmark
00:30:16has refused
00:30:17to do.
00:30:18They asked
00:30:18for a phone
00:30:18call and
00:30:19struck a
00:30:19collaborative
00:30:19tone,
00:30:20writing,
00:30:20we believe
00:30:21we should
00:30:21all work
00:30:21to take
00:30:22this down
00:30:22and de-escalate.
00:30:23So much is
00:30:24happening around
00:30:24us where we
00:30:24need to stand
00:30:25together.
00:30:26After Mr.
00:30:26Trump's
00:30:27response,
00:30:27Mr.
00:30:27Storrs said
00:30:28in a statement,
00:30:28quote,
00:30:28as regards
00:30:29the Nobel
00:30:29Peace Prize,
00:30:30I have on
00:30:31several occasions
00:30:31clearly explained
00:30:32to Trump
00:30:32what is well
00:30:33known,
00:30:34namely that it
00:30:34is an
00:30:35independent
00:30:35Nobel
00:30:36committee,
00:30:36not the
00:30:37Norwegian
00:30:37government
00:30:37that awards
00:30:38the prize,
00:30:38Mr.
00:30:38Storrs said.
00:30:39The White
00:30:40House did
00:30:40not respond
00:30:40to requests
00:30:41for comment.
00:30:42Mr.
00:30:42Trump has
00:30:42repeatedly
00:30:42challenged
00:30:43Denmark's
00:30:43claims to
00:30:44Greenland,
00:30:44but in
00:30:45decades-old
00:30:45agreements with
00:30:46the United
00:30:46States
00:30:46assigned with
00:30:47Denmark,
00:30:47the United
00:30:47States has
00:30:48recognized
00:30:48Denmark's
00:30:49close
00:30:49connection
00:30:49to the
00:30:49island.
00:30:50A 2004
00:30:51amendment to
00:30:51an older
00:30:52defense pact
00:30:52between
00:30:53Denmark
00:30:53and the
00:30:53United
00:30:53States,
00:30:54which grants
00:30:54the United
00:30:55States
00:30:55broad
00:30:55military
00:30:56access,
00:30:56explicitly
00:30:57recognizes
00:30:57Greenland
00:30:57as an
00:30:58equal part
00:30:59of the
00:30:59Kingdom
00:30:59of
00:31:00Denmark.
00:31:01And in
00:31:011916,
00:31:02Denmark sold
00:31:02what are
00:31:03now the
00:31:03U.S.
00:31:03Virgin Islands
00:31:04to the
00:31:05United States
00:31:05for $25
00:31:06million in
00:31:06gold.
00:31:07In the
00:31:07treaty for
00:31:08that deal,
00:31:08a clause
00:31:09reads,
00:31:09quote,
00:31:09the United
00:31:10States of
00:31:10America will
00:31:11not object
00:31:11to the
00:31:11Danish
00:31:12government
00:31:12extending
00:31:12their
00:31:12political
00:31:13and
00:31:13economic
00:31:14interest
00:31:14to the
00:31:14whole
00:31:15of
00:31:15Greenland.
00:31:16In the
00:31:17past year,
00:31:18Mr.
00:31:18Trump has
00:31:18repeatedly
00:31:18vowed to
00:31:19get
00:31:19Greenland.
00:31:20Denmark has
00:31:21repeatedly
00:31:21rebuffed
00:31:21him.
00:31:22Denmark's
00:31:22position is
00:31:23that it
00:31:23does not
00:31:23have the
00:31:23authority
00:31:23to sell
00:31:24the
00:31:24self-governing
00:31:25territory
00:31:25and that
00:31:26Greenland's
00:31:2657,000
00:31:27inhabitants
00:31:27will decide
00:31:28their own
00:31:28fate.
00:31:29Polls and
00:31:29interviews
00:31:30show that
00:31:30an overwhelming
00:31:31majority of
00:31:32Greenlanders
00:31:32strongly oppose
00:31:33joining the
00:31:33United States.
00:31:34On Saturday,
00:31:35Greenlanders
00:31:35staged the
00:31:36biggest protest
00:31:36of recent
00:31:37months.
00:31:37Hundreds
00:31:38marched
00:31:38through the
00:31:39snowy
00:31:39streets of
00:31:39Nuuk,
00:31:40the capital
00:31:40chanting,
00:31:41No means
00:31:41no,
00:31:42Greenland is
00:31:42already great
00:31:43and Yankee
00:31:44go home.
00:31:45In the
00:31:45past few
00:31:45days,
00:31:46Denmark and
00:31:46other European
00:31:47countries have
00:31:47sent more
00:31:47military forces
00:31:48to the
00:31:48island.
00:31:49Small groups
00:31:49of Danish
00:31:50soldiers
00:31:50dressed in
00:31:51green camouflage
00:31:51and dark
00:31:52woolen hats
00:31:52have been
00:31:53walking through
00:31:53downtown
00:31:54Nuuk.
00:31:54Beyond the
00:31:55harbor,
00:31:55a 200-foot-long
00:31:56Danish warship
00:31:57people were
00:31:57breaking through
00:31:57ice has been
00:31:58patrolling the
00:31:59shoreline.
00:32:00A much
00:32:00anticipated
00:32:01three-way
00:32:01meeting last
00:32:02week in
00:32:02the United
00:32:02States,
00:32:02Denmark and
00:32:03Greenland,
00:32:03hosted by
00:32:04Vice President
00:32:04J.D.
00:32:05Vance in
00:32:05Washington,
00:32:06did not
00:32:06produce any
00:32:06breakthroughs
00:32:07and seemed
00:32:07instead to
00:32:08create
00:32:08misunderstandings.
00:32:09It was the
00:32:10first time
00:32:10Greenland had
00:32:11been included
00:32:11in such
00:32:12high-level
00:32:12discussions,
00:32:13and the
00:32:13Danish and
00:32:13Greenlandic
00:32:14officials left
00:32:14saying that
00:32:15a working
00:32:15group had
00:32:15been formed
00:32:16to explore
00:32:17possibilities
00:32:17for a
00:32:17solution.
00:32:18But the
00:32:18Trump
00:32:18administration
00:32:19said
00:32:19afterwards
00:32:19that the
00:32:20two sides
00:32:20would begin
00:32:20technical
00:32:21talks on
00:32:21the acquisition
00:32:22of Greenland,
00:32:23a statement
00:32:23that raised
00:32:24even more
00:32:24concern in
00:32:25Greenland,
00:32:25in Denmark,
00:32:26and across
00:32:27Europe.
00:32:34So what
00:32:35we're saying
00:32:36is Trump
00:32:37is mad
00:32:38that he
00:32:39didn't get
00:32:40the Nobel
00:32:40Peace Prize,
00:32:41even though
00:32:42the person
00:32:42who did
00:32:43win it
00:32:43actually gave
00:32:44it to him.
00:32:44That happened
00:32:45last week.
00:32:48And therefore,
00:32:50ergo,
00:32:51Greenland is
00:32:52his next
00:32:53big thing.
00:32:54Here's the
00:32:55funny part.
00:32:59Trump may
00:32:59not know
00:33:00that Denmark
00:33:01and Norway
00:33:01are separate
00:33:02countries.
00:33:03He just
00:33:03kind of
00:33:04thinks it
00:33:04was all
00:33:04of one
00:33:05amorphous
00:33:06blob
00:33:07sort of
00:33:08thing,
00:33:09which is
00:33:10rather
00:33:11interesting
00:33:12and entertaining.
00:33:13Again,
00:33:13it would
00:33:14sound
00:33:14weird
00:33:18except
00:33:21for
00:33:22the fact
00:33:24that it's
00:33:24real and
00:33:25it happened
00:33:25and we
00:33:27have it
00:33:27from the
00:33:27Norwegians
00:33:28and this
00:33:29is just
00:33:31this whole
00:33:33thing today
00:33:34has just
00:33:34blown so
00:33:35wide open.
00:33:36It's not
00:33:37even funny.
00:33:40It's
00:33:40I think
00:33:45the problem
00:33:46for Trump
00:33:47is it's
00:33:47personal.
00:33:47and ironically
00:33:50his own
00:33:51book,
00:33:51The Art
00:33:52of the
00:33:52Deal,
00:33:53expressly
00:33:54says not
00:33:55to do
00:33:55that,
00:33:56which I
00:33:56think is
00:33:57funny.
00:33:59He's kind
00:34:00of breaking
00:34:00his own
00:34:01rulebook
00:34:01on how
00:34:02to do
00:34:02deals.
00:34:04You can't
00:34:05let them
00:34:05be personal
00:34:06and he's
00:34:07making it
00:34:07personal.
00:34:08I think
00:34:09it's also
00:34:10kind of
00:34:10frightening
00:34:11when he
00:34:12says,
00:34:13I no
00:34:14longer feel
00:34:14an obligation
00:34:15to think
00:34:16purely of
00:34:16peace.
00:34:19I'm not
00:34:19going to
00:34:20ask what
00:34:20that means
00:34:21because,
00:34:22you know,
00:34:23the answer
00:34:25is obvious
00:34:25and the
00:34:25answer is
00:34:26rhetorical.
00:34:27But I
00:34:28kind of
00:34:28wonder where
00:34:29his head
00:34:30is at
00:34:30with all
00:34:32of that.
00:34:34But that
00:34:35is the
00:34:36latest with
00:34:36the Greenland
00:34:38system.
00:34:38That's kind
00:34:38of where
00:34:39it stands
00:34:40today.
00:34:43And there
00:34:43is,
00:34:44given all
00:34:45the military
00:34:46stuff that
00:34:46we have
00:34:47in Greenland,
00:34:47there's
00:34:48really no
00:34:48need for
00:34:48us to
00:34:49own it.
00:34:49I think
00:34:50Trump is
00:34:52doing this
00:34:52to own
00:34:53Europe.
00:34:54And not
00:34:55own as
00:34:55in buy
00:34:55it, I
00:34:56mean own
00:34:56in the
00:34:56internet
00:34:57speak,
00:34:57just to
00:34:58kind of
00:34:58pwn
00:34:59Europe.
00:35:01To be
00:35:01kind of
00:35:01like,
00:35:01well,
00:35:02you didn't
00:35:02give me
00:35:03the medal
00:35:03I wanted,
00:35:04so now
00:35:04I'm going
00:35:05to just
00:35:05seize
00:35:06some
00:35:06territory
00:35:07and go
00:35:10that route.
00:35:12Which is
00:35:14kind of
00:35:14frightening.
00:35:15It strikes
00:35:15as a
00:35:16little bit
00:35:16of a
00:35:17temper tantrum,
00:35:18but it
00:35:19is blown
00:35:20the situation
00:35:20wide open.
00:35:21There is
00:35:22a lot of
00:35:22threats from
00:35:23Europe coming
00:35:23out on
00:35:24economic
00:35:24sanctions,
00:35:25ceasing
00:35:25trade,
00:35:26tariffs,
00:35:27all this
00:35:28type of
00:35:28thing.
00:35:28Trump is
00:35:28doing the
00:35:29same.
00:35:30And given
00:35:31that Danish
00:35:31troops are
00:35:32in Greenland
00:35:32and Trump
00:35:33is preparing
00:35:34the 11th
00:35:35airborne in
00:35:35Alaska,
00:35:36literally we
00:35:37could end
00:35:37up with a
00:35:38shooting war
00:35:38with a
00:35:39NATO ally,
00:35:41and that
00:35:42could be the
00:35:43collapse of
00:35:43NATO.
00:35:43Let's
00:35:47think for a
00:35:47moment who
00:35:48benefits from
00:35:49the collapse
00:35:49of NATO.
00:35:51Who,
00:35:52who,
00:35:52who?
00:35:53Hmm.
00:35:56Who would
00:35:57benefit from
00:35:57the collapse
00:35:58of NATO?
00:36:00Oh,
00:36:01oh wait,
00:36:04I know.
00:36:06Russia
00:36:07benefits
00:36:08greatly
00:36:09from a
00:36:10collapse of
00:36:10NATO.
00:36:12Do with
00:36:12that information
00:36:13what you
00:36:13will.
00:36:15It is
00:36:15741 and
00:36:17we have a
00:36:17lot of
00:36:17tabs, so
00:36:18we're going
00:36:18to skip
00:36:19some things.
00:36:20We're going
00:36:21to skip the
00:36:21Midas Touch
00:36:22video.
00:36:24We're going
00:36:25to skip that
00:36:25one.
00:36:26Let me see
00:36:27if I have
00:36:27anything else
00:36:27on Greenland
00:36:28in here.
00:36:30I do have
00:36:30some stuff
00:36:31on Minnesota.
00:36:32We can go
00:36:32to Minnesota
00:36:32for a minute.
00:36:34Don't need
00:36:34that.
00:36:36That's
00:36:36Minnesota.
00:36:37We can
00:36:37talk about
00:36:37that.
00:36:39Oh,
00:36:40this is
00:36:40actually,
00:36:41we should
00:36:42watch this.
00:36:43So,
00:36:43there's not
00:36:44often I agree
00:36:44with J.D.
00:36:45Vance.
00:36:47Although I
00:36:48liked him
00:36:48better when
00:36:48he wasn't a
00:36:49fan of
00:36:49Trump.
00:36:51But,
00:36:51this is
00:36:53good.
00:36:54This is
00:36:55good.
00:36:55This is
00:36:56the sense
00:36:56he articulates
00:36:57very clearly
00:36:59what the
00:37:00right-wing
00:37:01issue with
00:37:01globalization
00:37:02is,
00:37:03what a
00:37:03lot of
00:37:04us have
00:37:04been saying
00:37:04about
00:37:04globalization,
00:37:05although I
00:37:06was talking
00:37:06globalization
00:37:06from the
00:37:07left,
00:37:08what a
00:37:08lot of
00:37:08people have
00:37:08been saying
00:37:09about
00:37:09globalization
00:37:09since the
00:37:10WTO
00:37:11protests
00:37:11with China
00:37:12joining the
00:37:12World Trade
00:37:12Organization in
00:37:131999 in
00:37:14Seattle.
00:37:15We may
00:37:16not like
00:37:16whose mouth
00:37:17it's coming
00:37:18from,
00:37:19but it
00:37:19sounds damn
00:37:19good.
00:37:20Listen up.
00:37:21Because there
00:37:22were two
00:37:23conceits that
00:37:24our leadership
00:37:24class had
00:37:25when it
00:37:25came to
00:37:26globalization.
00:37:27The first
00:37:28is assuming
00:37:29that we
00:37:30can separate
00:37:30the making
00:37:31of things
00:37:31from the
00:37:32design of
00:37:32things.
00:37:33The idea
00:37:34of globalization
00:37:35was that
00:37:35rich countries
00:37:36would move
00:37:37further up
00:37:37the value
00:37:38chain while
00:37:39the poor
00:37:39countries made
00:37:40the simpler
00:37:40things.
00:37:41You would
00:37:42open an
00:37:42iPhone box
00:37:43and it
00:37:43would say
00:37:44designed in
00:37:45Cupertino,
00:37:46California.
00:37:46Now the
00:37:46implication,
00:37:47of course,
00:37:48is that it
00:37:48would be
00:37:49manufactured in
00:37:50Shenzhen
00:37:50or somewhere
00:37:51else.
00:37:52And yeah,
00:37:52some people
00:37:53might lose
00:37:53their jobs
00:37:54in manufacturing,
00:37:55but they
00:37:55could learn
00:37:56to design
00:37:57or, to
00:37:57use a very
00:37:58popular phrase,
00:37:59learn to
00:37:59code.
00:38:00But I
00:38:01think we
00:38:01got it
00:38:01wrong.
00:38:01It turns
00:38:02out that
00:38:03the geographies
00:38:03that do
00:38:04the manufacturing
00:38:05get awfully
00:38:06good at
00:38:06the designing
00:38:07of things.
00:38:08There are
00:38:08network effects,
00:38:09as you all
00:38:09well understand.
00:38:10The firms
00:38:11that design
00:38:11products work
00:38:12with firms
00:38:13that manufacture.
00:38:14They share
00:38:15intellectual property,
00:38:16they share
00:38:16best practices,
00:38:17and they
00:38:18even sometimes
00:38:19share critical
00:38:19employees.
00:38:21Now we
00:38:21assume that
00:38:22other nations
00:38:22would always
00:38:23trail us
00:38:23in the value
00:38:24chain,
00:38:25but it
00:38:25turns out
00:38:25that as
00:38:26they got
00:38:26better at
00:38:27the low
00:38:27end of
00:38:27the value
00:38:28chain,
00:38:28they also
00:38:29started
00:38:29catching up
00:38:30on the
00:38:30higher end.
00:38:31We were
00:38:31squeezed
00:38:32from both
00:38:32ends.
00:38:33Now that
00:38:33was the
00:38:33first conceit
00:38:34of globalization.
00:38:35I think
00:38:35the second
00:38:36is that
00:38:37cheap labor
00:38:37is fundamentally
00:38:39a crutch,
00:38:40and it's a
00:38:40crutch that
00:38:41inhibits
00:38:42innovation.
00:38:42I might even
00:38:42say that it's
00:38:43a drug that
00:38:44too many
00:38:45American firms
00:38:45got addicted
00:38:46to.
00:38:47Now if
00:38:47you can
00:38:47make a
00:38:48product
00:38:48more cheaply,
00:38:50it's far
00:38:50too easy
00:38:51to do
00:38:51that rather
00:38:52than to
00:38:52innovate.
00:38:54And whether
00:38:54we were
00:38:54offshoring
00:38:55factories to
00:38:56cheap labor
00:38:56economies or
00:38:57importing
00:38:58cheap labor
00:38:59through our
00:38:59immigration
00:39:00system,
00:39:01cheap labor
00:39:02became the
00:39:02drug of
00:39:03Western
00:39:04economies.
00:39:04And I'd
00:39:05say that
00:39:05if you
00:39:06look in
00:39:06nearly every
00:39:07country from
00:39:07Canada to
00:39:08the UK that
00:39:09imported large
00:39:09amounts of
00:39:10cheap labor,
00:39:11you've seen
00:39:11productivity
00:39:12stagnate.
00:39:13And I don't
00:39:13think that's
00:39:14not a
00:39:15total
00:39:16happenstance.
00:39:17I think that
00:39:17the connection
00:39:18is very
00:39:19direct.
00:39:20Now one of
00:39:20the debates
00:39:21you hear on
00:39:21the minimum
00:39:22wage, for
00:39:22instance, is
00:39:23that increases
00:39:24in the minimum
00:39:25wage force
00:39:25firms to
00:39:26automate.
00:39:27So a higher
00:39:27wage at
00:39:28McDonald's means
00:39:29more kiosks.
00:39:30And whatever
00:39:30your views on
00:39:31the wisdom of
00:39:31the minimum
00:39:32wage, I'm not
00:39:33going to comment
00:39:33on that here.
00:39:34Companies
00:39:35innovating in
00:39:36the absence of
00:39:36cheap labor is
00:39:37a good thing.
00:39:38I think most
00:39:39of you are not
00:39:40worried about
00:39:40getting cheaper
00:39:41and cheaper
00:39:41labor.
00:39:42You're worried
00:39:42about innovating,
00:39:43about building
00:39:44new things,
00:39:44about the old
00:39:45formulation of
00:39:46technology is
00:39:47doing more
00:39:48with less.
00:39:49You guys are
00:39:50all trying to
00:39:50do more with
00:39:50less every
00:39:51single day.
00:39:52And so I'd
00:39:53ask my friends,
00:39:54both on the
00:39:55tech optimist
00:39:56side and on
00:39:57the populist
00:39:58side, not to
00:39:58see the failure
00:39:59of the logic of
00:40:00globalization as
00:40:02a failure of
00:40:02innovation.
00:40:04Indeed, I'd
00:40:05say that
00:40:05globalization's
00:40:06hunger for
00:40:06cheap labor
00:40:07is a problem
00:40:08precisely because
00:40:10it's been bad
00:40:11for innovation.
00:40:12Both our
00:40:13working people,
00:40:14our populists,
00:40:15and our
00:40:15innovators gathered
00:40:16here today have
00:40:17the same enemy.
00:40:19And the solution,
00:40:20I believe, is
00:40:21American innovation.
00:40:22Because
00:40:23honestly, 1010,
00:40:27no notes.
00:40:28He's not wrong.
00:40:30I have been
00:40:30saying on this
00:40:31show every night
00:40:33for three years,
00:40:34until you get
00:40:35American corporations
00:40:36off the teat of
00:40:37cheap labor, you
00:40:37will never solve
00:40:38immigration.
00:40:39simple as.
00:40:40It is literally
00:40:41that simple.
00:40:44That's it.
00:40:45And he's
00:40:46absolutely right.
00:40:48The whole,
00:40:48he's talking about
00:40:49what's called the
00:40:50head and body
00:40:50theory of
00:40:51economies.
00:40:52The idea was
00:40:52that poorer
00:40:53countries would
00:40:53make stuff,
00:40:54smarter countries
00:40:55would design it
00:40:55and do all the
00:40:57intellectual,
00:40:58you know,
00:40:59engineering,
00:41:00all this type
00:41:01of thing.
00:41:02And he's
00:41:02absolutely right.
00:41:03What especially
00:41:03China has done
00:41:04is they've
00:41:05taken that
00:41:05ability,
00:41:06those skills,
00:41:07that talented
00:41:07workforce,
00:41:07and they
00:41:08have gotten
00:41:09better and
00:41:10better and
00:41:11better to
00:41:11where now
00:41:12they are
00:41:12doing things
00:41:13on par with
00:41:14the United
00:41:14States.
00:41:15There was a
00:41:15group of
00:41:16auto executives
00:41:17that went
00:41:17over to
00:41:17China to
00:41:18look at
00:41:18BYD's
00:41:18facilities and
00:41:19they were
00:41:19blown away.
00:41:21Like,
00:41:22the CEO of
00:41:22Ford said,
00:41:23we are behind.
00:41:24We are so
00:41:25behind what
00:41:25the Chinese
00:41:25are doing.
00:41:26And there's
00:41:27a lot,
00:41:27when you're
00:41:28making stuff
00:41:28regularly,
00:41:29there's a
00:41:29lot of
00:41:30opportunity for
00:41:31innovation.
00:41:32Instantly,
00:41:32that's something
00:41:33where American
00:41:34industry has
00:41:35always struggled.
00:41:36One of the
00:41:36reasons Japan
00:41:37was able to
00:41:38rise in the
00:41:3870s and
00:41:3980s was
00:41:40ironically because
00:41:41of steel.
00:41:44After the
00:41:44war, Japan
00:41:45did not have
00:41:46very many
00:41:46steel mills,
00:41:47and so when
00:41:48they built
00:41:49new steel mills,
00:41:51they built
00:41:52them with the
00:41:53most modern
00:41:53technology of
00:41:54the time.
00:41:54That often
00:41:55includes what
00:41:55was called
00:41:56electric arc
00:41:56furnaces.
00:41:58They're cheaper,
00:41:59they're faster,
00:41:59they're more
00:42:00efficient, all
00:42:01this type of
00:42:02thing.
00:42:02So Japanese
00:42:03steel was much,
00:42:04much cheaper
00:42:05than American
00:42:05steel, which
00:42:06still used
00:42:06old-fashioned
00:42:07blast furnaces,
00:42:08which by the
00:42:08early 1970s was
00:42:09a dated
00:42:10technology.
00:42:11A lot of
00:42:11steel firms
00:42:12never installed
00:42:13new furnaces,
00:42:13didn't want to
00:42:14spend the
00:42:14capital, would
00:42:15rather return
00:42:15it to
00:42:15shareholders,
00:42:16and that was
00:42:17the American
00:42:17steel industry
00:42:18gone under.
00:42:19Incidentally,
00:42:20the Nippon
00:42:21steel deal,
00:42:22which Trump
00:42:22almost killed
00:42:23and eventually
00:42:24did go through
00:42:24with U.S.
00:42:25steel, part
00:42:26of Nippon's
00:42:27plan was to
00:42:28finally put in
00:42:30new electric
00:42:31arc furnaces
00:42:32in U.S.
00:42:33steel because
00:42:34they're just
00:42:35simply faster
00:42:36and more
00:42:36efficient.
00:42:38And steel
00:42:39is an excellent
00:42:40example.
00:42:40That's how
00:42:41that, that's
00:42:42a real-life
00:42:43example of
00:42:44how that
00:42:44happens.
00:42:45Japan did
00:42:46it, China
00:42:47did it, we
00:42:48have been,
00:42:48you know,
00:42:49dealing with
00:42:50these onslaughts
00:42:51from both
00:42:51sides for all
00:42:52of these years,
00:42:53and what it
00:42:54has left
00:42:54behind is a
00:42:55populace that
00:42:56doesn't have
00:42:56jobs, that has
00:42:57decreased spending
00:42:58power, you know,
00:42:59it's very hard to
00:42:59find jobs that pay a
00:43:00living wage, all
00:43:01this sort of
00:43:02thing.
00:43:02Your TV's never
00:43:03been cheaper,
00:43:04but that is,
00:43:07that's how we've
00:43:07gotten ourselves
00:43:09into the present
00:43:10situation and the
00:43:11present circumstances.
00:43:12When I saw this
00:43:13video, I was dead
00:43:14shocked that it was
00:43:14J.D. Vance
00:43:15talking about it,
00:43:16although he had
00:43:16talked about that
00:43:17in his books,
00:43:17I suppose it's not
00:43:18too surprising,
00:43:19but I was still
00:43:19shocked I had
00:43:20forgotten.
00:43:22And it's like,
00:43:22yeah, I could
00:43:23have said this,
00:43:24I have been
00:43:25saying this for
00:43:25years and years,
00:43:27like, yes,
00:43:28and offshoring,
00:43:29all this sort of
00:43:29thing, more,
00:43:30there are so
00:43:31many towns,
00:43:32especially in this
00:43:32region, I'm
00:43:33currently in
00:43:33Connecticut,
00:43:34especially in this
00:43:35region of the
00:43:35country, there's a
00:43:37whole legacy of
00:43:38industry here that's
00:43:39rotting and
00:43:40decaying.
00:43:41There are massive
00:43:42facilities that are
00:43:43rotting and decaying
00:43:44because those jobs
00:43:46left 30 years ago
00:43:47to Thailand, to
00:43:48Vietnam, to
00:43:49Malaysia, to
00:43:50Indonesia, to
00:43:50China, to
00:43:51Japan, all
00:43:52these sorts of
00:43:53things.
00:43:53And that has
00:43:55hollowed out the
00:43:56American workforce,
00:43:58and there are
00:43:59many towns that
00:44:00would be thriving
00:44:01and growing if
00:44:02they still had a
00:44:03major industrial
00:44:04employer there who
00:44:05was innovating and
00:44:06coming up with new
00:44:07products and new
00:44:08processes and new
00:44:09automation.
00:44:10Re-industrialization
00:44:11really is a
00:44:12revitalization of
00:44:13America.
00:44:14But that will only
00:44:16work if it is
00:44:18focused on people
00:44:19and workers and
00:44:21getting money in
00:44:22the pockets of
00:44:23people.
00:44:24And J.D.
00:44:25Vance is right.
00:44:26You cannot have a
00:44:29successful society
00:44:30that's relying on
00:44:31cheap labor, at
00:44:31least not for very
00:44:32long anyway.
00:44:34I think one of the
00:44:35things he kind of
00:44:36forgets is part of
00:44:37the reason the
00:44:38conceits of
00:44:39globalization were
00:44:40put into place was
00:44:41because of what
00:44:42happened, what was
00:44:43happening with
00:44:43inflation in the
00:44:45late 70s due to
00:44:46us leaving the
00:44:47gold standard in
00:44:481971 and we had
00:44:50really overspent in
00:44:51the 60s.
00:44:51So in the 60s
00:44:53we decided to do
00:44:54a lot of things
00:44:55at once.
00:44:55One of them is we
00:44:56created the modern
00:44:57welfare state, the
00:44:58other one was we
00:44:58went to the moon.
00:44:59The Apollo program
00:45:00was costing 10% of
00:45:01GDP at its closure
00:45:02in 72.
00:45:03It was very
00:45:03expensive to do
00:45:04that.
00:45:05And so coming out
00:45:09of the 60s, we
00:45:09had spent all of
00:45:10this money and the
00:45:12reality is we had
00:45:13spent more than we
00:45:15had gold and so
00:45:16Nixon decided to
00:45:16solve this problem by
00:45:18ending the Bretton
00:45:18Woods system which
00:45:19had set the price of
00:45:20gold fixed at 35
00:45:21dollars per one
00:45:23ounce of gold and
00:45:24he left the gold
00:45:24standards and let
00:45:25the currency free
00:45:26flow.
00:45:26The result was
00:45:28inflation.
00:45:29Now this was also
00:45:30abetted by the oil
00:45:32crises of 73, 74, and
00:45:3475 with OPEC and
00:45:35all this type of
00:45:36thing that a sudden
00:45:37increase in the
00:45:38cost of energy also
00:45:39fueled the inflation.
00:45:41But the way Volcar got
00:45:42inflation to come
00:45:43down was by raising
00:45:44interest rates
00:45:45absolutely sky high
00:45:47and by basically
00:45:48divorcing wages from
00:45:50productivity and
00:45:53that basically what
00:45:54they did is they
00:45:55filled them in with
00:45:55two things.
00:45:56They filled it in
00:45:56with cheaper goods
00:45:57made overseas and
00:45:58they filled it in
00:45:58with consumer debt.
00:46:00Both of the things
00:46:01that were innovations
00:46:01of the late, mid to
00:46:03late 80s.
00:46:04Didn't have credit
00:46:05scores before 89,
00:46:06didn't really have
00:46:07credit cards until
00:46:07the mid 80s, all
00:46:08this sort of thing.
00:46:09That was how they
00:46:10papered over the fact
00:46:11that workers were not
00:46:12keeping up, workers'
00:46:13wages could not keep
00:46:15up with productivity
00:46:16and break the cycle
00:46:17of inflation.
00:46:19And globalization
00:46:20allowed us to get
00:46:21away with that.
00:46:22Globalization's now
00:46:23falling apart.
00:46:25What comes next?
00:46:27I don't know, but
00:46:28J.D. Vance is right.
00:46:29If we want to fix
00:46:29this society, we have
00:46:30got to get off of
00:46:31cheap labor.
00:46:32People have got to
00:46:33get paid a decent
00:46:33wage again.
00:46:34We cannot continue
00:46:36with shareholder
00:46:36capitalism.
00:46:37We cannot continue
00:46:38stuffing the pockets
00:46:39of the asset wealthy
00:46:40and accept people to
00:46:41continue.
00:46:42Can't do it.
00:46:43Otherwise, we will
00:46:44end up with collapse.
00:46:44So, he's absolutely,
00:46:46absolutely 110% right
00:46:48and it's fair to say
00:46:50so.
00:46:50And anyone who gets
00:46:51in my comments and
00:46:52complains about me
00:46:52complimenting J.D. Vance
00:46:53can, you know, can
00:46:56suck it.
00:46:59I am...
00:47:01Oh, this is the post
00:47:02about Iran.
00:47:03But before we go to
00:47:04the post about Iran,
00:47:05someone asked a
00:47:05question in the
00:47:06comment section.
00:47:08Aren't the IRGC
00:47:09killing protesters in
00:47:10Iran right now?
00:47:11They are.
00:47:13Reports have come in
00:47:14of at least
00:47:1520,000,
00:47:18possibly more,
00:47:20people killed
00:47:21by the Iranian
00:47:23regime.
00:47:27The number
00:47:28is probably
00:47:29higher.
00:47:30There's an internet
00:47:31blackout right now
00:47:32and there's a huge
00:47:32crackdown.
00:47:34Rumor running around
00:47:35is that the crackdown
00:47:36is working,
00:47:37but we don't
00:47:38necessarily know
00:47:39for how long.
00:47:41Um, I want to
00:47:43dive in to, to
00:47:45this piece.
00:47:45It's full on
00:47:46sub-stack, but
00:47:47we're going to, uh,
00:47:49we're going to
00:47:49kind of go, go to
00:47:50the end, um,
00:47:52where it says,
00:47:53well, let's start,
00:47:54we'll skip over a
00:47:55little bit.
00:47:55So, it says here,
00:47:56there's an enormous
00:47:57amount of
00:47:57misinformation
00:47:58circulating about
00:47:59the current
00:47:59Iranian revolution.
00:48:00Almost all of it
00:48:01stems from
00:48:02historical revisionism
00:48:03and distortion
00:48:03deliberately spread
00:48:05since at least
00:48:05the 1970s by the
00:48:07Islamic regime
00:48:08and its ideological
00:48:08allies, most
00:48:09prominently the
00:48:10Islamist-Marxist
00:48:10terrorist cult
00:48:11M.E.K.
00:48:12Two core mantras
00:48:13have been relentlessly
00:48:14repeated by Islamist
00:48:15and Marxist camps
00:48:16and successfully
00:48:17entrenched over
00:48:17decades.
00:48:18The first is the
00:48:19claim that the
00:48:19Shah was a
00:48:20murderous dictator
00:48:21and a footman
00:48:21of the CIA.
00:48:24Now, just know
00:48:26that's the
00:48:27informational bit.
00:48:29Coming down here
00:48:29to the bottom,
00:48:31um, the,
00:48:34this context
00:48:34matters because it
00:48:35stands in contrast,
00:48:36in stark contrast
00:48:37to the mythology
00:48:38constructed around
00:48:38the Shah.
00:48:39Pahlavi is portrayed
00:48:40as a bloodthirsty
00:48:41dictator, yet even
00:48:42as critics speak
00:48:43of only a few
00:48:43thousand deaths,
00:48:44including executions
00:48:45nearly over four
00:48:46decades.
00:48:47The majority were
00:48:47linked to Marxist
00:48:48terrorism or
00:48:49Islamic insurgency.
00:48:50The high assessments
00:48:51around 3,000 span
00:48:52an entire era
00:48:53and describe a
00:48:54security state
00:48:54confronting political
00:48:55violence and
00:48:56terrorism, not the
00:48:57systemic killing
00:48:57of civilians.
00:49:00Now, contrast this
00:49:01with the Islamic
00:49:02Republic or any
00:49:02other regime in
00:49:03the region, including
00:49:03NATO member Turkey
00:49:04and Erdogan's
00:49:05mass killing of
00:49:05Kurds.
00:49:06According to
00:49:07Iran International
00:49:07and Iranian
00:49:08human rights
00:49:08networks, there
00:49:09is a clear
00:49:09pattern.
00:49:10In 78 to 81,
00:49:1188, and 19,
00:49:1320, and 23,
00:49:14and the most
00:49:14recent wave, tens
00:49:15of thousands have
00:49:15been killed in
00:49:16extremely short
00:49:16time frames during
00:49:17crackdowns.
00:49:18Reports of 20,000
00:49:19killed within weeks
00:49:20point to meticulously
00:49:21organized and
00:49:21executed genocidal
00:49:22waves carried out
00:49:23by the IRGC and
00:49:24proxy Arab militias.
00:49:26The barbarity of
00:49:26these operations
00:49:27includes street
00:49:28executions, rape,
00:49:29systemic maiming,
00:49:30the deliberate
00:49:30blinding of
00:49:31protesters, and the
00:49:31burning alive of
00:49:32defenseless civilians.
00:49:33As always, under
00:49:34closed terror systems,
00:49:35precise numbers remain
00:49:36unclear.
00:49:37However, this
00:49:37scale exceeds
00:49:38anything comparable
00:49:39to the Pahlavi
00:49:40area.
00:49:41Pahlavi's monarchy
00:49:41was a modernization
00:49:42project of very
00:49:43limited authoritarianism,
00:49:45constrained by
00:49:45institutions and
00:49:46guided by a
00:49:47forward-looking
00:49:47civilizational model
00:49:48that neither rested
00:49:49on a morbid
00:49:50ideology nor
00:49:50sacralized killing
00:49:52and industrialized
00:49:53terror.
00:49:53Curiously, Reza Shah
00:49:54and Muhammad Reza Shah
00:49:55portrayed as
00:49:56authoritarian dictators,
00:49:57despite being
00:49:58comparatively liberal
00:49:59next to Mustafa
00:50:00Kamal Ataturk,
00:50:02who ruled
00:50:03ruthlessly,
00:50:04crushed all
00:50:04opposition,
00:50:05and still
00:50:05revered as a
00:50:05national hero.
00:50:06The key
00:50:07difference here
00:50:07is timing.
00:50:08Ataturk emerged
00:50:09as a nationalist
00:50:09revolutionary on
00:50:10the ruins of the
00:50:11Islamic Ottoman
00:50:11Empire, which
00:50:12allowed him to
00:50:13take over Turkey.
00:50:14and it was
00:50:15kind of
00:50:17interesting
00:50:18because
00:50:19the Shah
00:50:20was not
00:50:21always popular.
00:50:22He was a bit
00:50:23decadent.
00:50:24This is a man
00:50:24that had his
00:50:24lunch flown in
00:50:25via Concord
00:50:26for a while
00:50:27late in the
00:50:29yeah,
00:50:30from Paris
00:50:30so he could
00:50:31have, you
00:50:31know,
00:50:32Parisian lunch
00:50:33sort of thing.
00:50:34Horrific waste.
00:50:37And I
00:50:38was mindful
00:50:39of reading this
00:50:40because last
00:50:41week we had
00:50:41on Zalal Habibi
00:50:42and I had
00:50:43asked her if
00:50:44there was
00:50:44any way
00:50:45the Shah,
00:50:48this guy,
00:50:49he has died.
00:50:51His son is
00:50:51the crown prince
00:50:52is still alive
00:50:53and he has
00:50:54been, you
00:50:54know, actively
00:50:55encouraging people
00:50:56to protest
00:50:57and to lead
00:50:58on all of this
00:50:58and I said,
00:50:59well, perhaps,
00:50:59you know,
00:51:00perhaps his son
00:51:01who would be
00:51:01Shah if they
00:51:01were still in
00:51:02power could,
00:51:04you know,
00:51:04aid with the
00:51:05transition of
00:51:05the Iranian
00:51:06government.
00:51:06He could
00:51:06partner with
00:51:07the diaspora
00:51:08and, you
00:51:08know, much
00:51:09like the
00:51:09monarchy
00:51:10helped
00:51:11transition out
00:51:12of Franco
00:51:12as Spain
00:51:13into a
00:51:14new modern
00:51:14era.
00:51:14Perhaps the
00:51:15Shah could
00:51:15help Iran
00:51:15do that
00:51:16too.
00:51:16And she
00:51:17said,
00:51:17no, no,
00:51:17no, no,
00:51:17no, the
00:51:18Shah was
00:51:18terrible.
00:51:19There was
00:51:20all these
00:51:20killings.
00:51:20He had the
00:51:21secret police,
00:51:21the Savak,
00:51:22all this sort
00:51:23of thing.
00:51:23And so I
00:51:23found it and
00:51:24it was lovely
00:51:24and interesting
00:51:25and fascinating
00:51:26and I was
00:51:27kind of just
00:51:28like, oh,
00:51:28it could be a
00:51:29thing.
00:51:29Nope, not
00:51:29popular.
00:51:30Okay, great.
00:51:31And this is
00:51:32kind of interesting
00:51:32to kind of
00:51:33stand in contrast
00:51:33to that idea
00:51:35that, you
00:51:36know, the
00:51:36Shah wasn't
00:51:37necessarily so
00:51:38bad and
00:51:39that, you
00:51:39know, perhaps
00:51:40bringing back
00:51:41the monarchy
00:51:41to Iran
00:51:42is a better
00:51:44idea than
00:51:46the current
00:51:46theocracy.
00:51:47I think
00:51:47anything would
00:51:48be better
00:51:48than the
00:51:49current
00:51:49theocracy,
00:51:49but it
00:51:50appears that
00:51:50a lot of
00:51:51at least
00:51:51the diaspora
00:51:52resistance
00:51:52groups like
00:51:53the one we
00:51:53spoke to
00:51:54are looking
00:51:54for just a
00:51:55more modern
00:51:55democracy
00:51:56than maybe
00:51:57a constitutional
00:51:57monarchy
00:51:58with a
00:52:00history of
00:52:01a leader,
00:52:02you know,
00:52:03hereditary
00:52:03leader that
00:52:04had been
00:52:05violent against
00:52:06the Iranian
00:52:07people.
00:52:08Although there
00:52:10are, I did
00:52:10see video
00:52:11today of
00:52:11protests of
00:52:12people asking
00:52:13for the
00:52:13Shah to
00:52:14return.
00:52:14So it'll
00:52:15be interesting
00:52:15to see what
00:52:16role the
00:52:17Shah plays
00:52:18in Iran
00:52:20and what
00:52:20role Reza
00:52:21Pahlavi
00:52:22plays, and
00:52:22he posted
00:52:23himself earlier
00:52:24today, he
00:52:25is planning
00:52:26to return
00:52:27to Iran
00:52:28to help
00:52:29Iran into
00:52:29this new
00:52:30era.
00:52:31It'll be
00:52:32interesting to
00:52:32see how
00:52:34these resistance
00:52:35groups that
00:52:35have been
00:52:36around for
00:52:3640, 50
00:52:37years,
00:52:37and the
00:52:38Shah
00:52:38clutch
00:52:39together in
00:52:40creating the
00:52:41new institutions
00:52:41and the new
00:52:42government of
00:52:42Iran once
00:52:43the present
00:52:43government is
00:52:44unseated.
00:52:47And I don't
00:52:49know if they're
00:52:49going to survive
00:52:50this.
00:52:50They have
00:52:51survived stuff
00:52:51before, but
00:52:52this one I
00:52:52think is
00:52:53particularly bad.
00:52:54And I
00:52:54think it's a
00:52:57very hard
00:52:57time right
00:52:58now if
00:52:59you are
00:53:00in the
00:53:01present
00:53:02Iranian
00:53:03government.
00:53:06This is a
00:53:07long article
00:53:07in the
00:53:07Atlantic about
00:53:08the America
00:53:10and the world
00:53:10and the changing
00:53:10world order.
00:53:11I might have
00:53:11to save that
00:53:12for the
00:53:12newsletter.
00:53:14This is
00:53:14about Davos,
00:53:16which is not
00:53:17important, all
00:53:17this type of
00:53:18thing.
00:53:18that's a
00:53:20post about
00:53:21the thing
00:53:21we just
00:53:21talked about
00:53:21with Norway.
00:53:24This is more
00:53:25to do with
00:53:26Minnesota, and
00:53:28we should check
00:53:29in on
00:53:32Minnesota
00:53:32quickly.
00:53:37This is really
00:53:37important.
00:53:38I might save
00:53:38it for next
00:53:39week because
00:53:39it's evergreen.
00:53:41Let us check
00:53:43in on
00:53:44Minnesota,
00:53:46though.
00:53:46So,
00:53:46this clip
00:53:48from Fox
00:53:50Business is
00:53:52Representative
00:53:52Andy Ogle
00:53:53talking about
00:53:54Minnesota and
00:53:55the present
00:53:56protests and
00:53:57the pushback
00:53:57against
00:53:58ICE action
00:54:01in Minnesota.
00:54:04And it
00:54:04is rather
00:54:06caustic, so
00:54:07let's listen
00:54:08in.
00:54:10Look,
00:54:11when you
00:54:11look at the
00:54:12footage of
00:54:13those folks
00:54:14that stormed
00:54:14that church,
00:54:15if that was a
00:54:15bunch of
00:54:16conservatives,
00:54:17a bunch of
00:54:17MAGA folks,
00:54:18they've all
00:54:19been arrested,
00:54:20right?
00:54:20But because
00:54:20they're libtards
00:54:21in a blue
00:54:22city, they
00:54:22get a pass.
00:54:23Enough is
00:54:24enough.
00:54:24You have,
00:54:25you know,
00:54:25when you look
00:54:26at ICE,
00:54:26when you look
00:54:27at the
00:54:27difficult job
00:54:28they're doing,
00:54:29more importantly,
00:54:30you look at
00:54:30the individuals
00:54:31they're detaining.
00:54:32So when you
00:54:32look at the
00:54:32criminal records
00:54:33of those
00:54:33that they're
00:54:34detaining,
00:54:34both from
00:54:35their home
00:54:35country and
00:54:36here,
00:54:36roughly 70%,
00:54:38roughly 70%
00:54:39have some sort
00:54:40of criminal
00:54:41record.
00:54:41This is who's
00:54:42being deported.
00:54:43Murderers,
00:54:43rapists,
00:54:44drug traffickers,
00:54:45child traffickers,
00:54:46we need to get
00:54:47rid of those
00:54:48folks,
00:54:48get them out
00:54:48of our society
00:54:49and if the
00:54:49libtards are
00:54:50going to side
00:54:50with lawlessness,
00:54:52that's on them,
00:54:53not on the
00:54:54rest of us
00:54:54because you know
00:54:55what?
00:54:55This is an
00:54:5680-20 issue.
00:54:57America wants
00:54:58a better economy,
00:54:59safe streets,
00:55:00and part of that
00:55:01is President
00:55:01Trump's
00:55:02deportation orders.
00:55:03Yeah.
00:55:03So look,
00:55:04you know,
00:55:04when you look
00:55:05at the footage
00:55:06that's certainly
00:55:17a position,
00:55:18the position
00:55:18is not
00:55:18exciting.
00:55:19I think
00:55:20it is,
00:55:22I mean,
00:55:22and he's not
00:55:23necessarily wrong
00:55:23about the
00:55:25people protesting
00:55:26in a church
00:55:27because the
00:55:27pastor was
00:55:29connected to
00:55:30ICE.
00:55:30That was a
00:55:31thing this
00:55:31weekend.
00:55:32There were
00:55:32protesters who
00:55:33attacked a
00:55:33church during
00:55:34services because
00:55:35the pastor there
00:55:36has been
00:55:36working with
00:55:36ICE.
00:55:37Don Lemon
00:55:37was there.
00:55:39There's been,
00:55:40I saw a tweet
00:55:40that said that
00:55:41he might be
00:55:41getting charged,
00:55:43catching federal
00:55:44charges for
00:55:45being a part of
00:55:46that under
00:55:46the KKK
00:55:47Act.
00:55:49And he's
00:55:50not wrong.
00:55:51If MAGA
00:55:52people were
00:55:53marching into
00:55:54a church in
00:55:55protest,
00:55:56it probably
00:55:56would not
00:55:57have gone
00:55:57down that
00:55:58way.
00:55:59However,
00:55:59I think
00:56:00it is
00:56:00unbecoming
00:56:04of a
00:56:07sitting
00:56:07congressperson
00:56:08to use
00:56:08a word
00:56:09like
00:56:09libtard
00:56:09on
00:56:10television.
00:56:12I think
00:56:13it is
00:56:13entertaining
00:56:14the casual
00:56:16way with
00:56:16which he
00:56:17just lets
00:56:17that fly
00:56:18and Fox
00:56:18doesn't
00:56:18push back
00:56:19on it.
00:56:22It's also
00:56:23an indication
00:56:24that he
00:56:24doesn't
00:56:24necessarily
00:56:25see the
00:56:27other side
00:56:27as people.
00:56:29Now,
00:56:30one could
00:56:31definitely
00:56:31argue there's
00:56:32plenty of
00:56:32liberals who
00:56:33think the
00:56:33same thing
00:56:33about MAGA
00:56:34people.
00:56:35That road
00:56:35travels both
00:56:36ways and
00:56:37it's very
00:56:38wide,
00:56:38well-painted
00:56:39and plowed.
00:56:42This is so
00:56:43emblematic of
00:56:44what's wrong
00:56:44with political
00:56:44dialogue today
00:56:45though.
00:56:47I mean,
00:56:47the situation
00:56:49in Minnesota
00:56:49is quite
00:56:50perilous
00:56:51given the
00:56:52present
00:56:53giant
00:56:53corruption
00:56:55scandal
00:56:55involving the
00:56:56Somali
00:56:56community
00:56:56and given
00:56:57what's
00:56:59happening
00:56:59with ICE
00:57:00and the
00:57:00protests
00:57:01and the
00:57:02shooting of
00:57:02Renee
00:57:03good and
00:57:04how that
00:57:04has become
00:57:05a thing
00:57:06of the
00:57:06moment
00:57:06and all
00:57:07this type
00:57:08of thing.
00:57:10It is
00:57:10quite obvious
00:57:11we're not
00:57:12seeing each
00:57:13other as
00:57:13fellow citizens.
00:57:15We're not
00:57:15seeing each
00:57:16other as
00:57:17people participating
00:57:18in society.
00:57:19We're seeing
00:57:20each other as
00:57:21MAGA Nazis
00:57:22and libtards
00:57:23and that's
00:57:24it.
00:57:25That's the
00:57:26sides,
00:57:26whatever have
00:57:27you.
00:57:28And I
00:57:29guess I
00:57:29don't expect
00:57:30a backbench
00:57:30congressman
00:57:31from Tennessee
00:57:32to be
00:57:33mindful of
00:57:34all of
00:57:34these things
00:57:35but it
00:57:35is a
00:57:36rather
00:57:36stark and
00:57:38sad moment
00:57:38I think
00:57:39for the
00:57:39country.
00:57:39I heard a
00:57:40comment.
00:57:43Oh,
00:57:43someone says
00:57:44the priest
00:57:44had the
00:57:45same name.
00:57:46He was
00:57:46unrelated to
00:57:47ICE.
00:57:47Well,
00:57:47see,
00:57:47that's even
00:57:48more dumb
00:57:48because then
00:57:48that whole
00:57:49protest was
00:57:49pointless.
00:57:52I had
00:57:53seen only
00:57:53a couple
00:57:54videos
00:57:55about it,
00:57:56the one
00:57:56with Don
00:57:57Lemon
00:57:57talking to
00:57:58somebody and
00:57:59there was
00:57:59another several
00:58:00tweets this
00:58:00morning about
00:58:01it.
00:58:01No,
00:58:01no,
00:58:01no.
00:58:02See,
00:58:02that's even
00:58:02more,
00:58:02that's even
00:58:03more,
00:58:03more dumb.
00:58:06And regardless
00:58:07of whether he
00:58:07was,
00:58:07thank you though,
00:58:09regardless of
00:58:10whether he was
00:58:10laid to ICE,
00:58:11those protesters
00:58:11shouldn't have
00:58:12been there.
00:58:12Not at church,
00:58:13not during,
00:58:13that whole idea
00:58:15was so dumb.
00:58:16Mostly because,
00:58:17and here's the
00:58:17important part,
00:58:18the right to
00:58:19protest ends
00:58:20at the sidewalk
00:58:21because the
00:58:23church's private
00:58:23property owned
00:58:25by at the
00:58:25church.
00:58:26So if you
00:58:27want to
00:58:27protest the
00:58:28church,
00:58:28you have to
00:58:29be outside
00:58:30on the street
00:58:30and the sidewalk.
00:58:31Now out there,
00:58:32you may put up
00:58:32as many signs
00:58:33as you wish.
00:58:34You may stand
00:58:34there all the
00:58:35live long day
00:58:36at 20 degrees
00:58:37in the snow.
00:58:38That's all fine
00:58:38for you.
00:58:39But that,
00:58:40they should never
00:58:41have gone inside,
00:58:42they should have
00:58:42never interrupted
00:58:43services,
00:58:44all this type of
00:58:45thing.
00:58:45Regardless of
00:58:46all of this,
00:58:47the political
00:58:47dialogue on all
00:58:48of this is
00:58:49absolutely gone
00:58:50to,
00:58:51gone to hell
00:58:52in a hand
00:58:52basket.
00:58:53And the fact
00:58:54that they didn't
00:58:54even get the
00:58:55right place
00:58:56to protest
00:58:56is even
00:58:57worse.
00:58:59So,
00:58:59terrible,
00:59:00terrible,
00:59:00terrible,
00:59:01terrible.
00:59:04Let's see.
00:59:05Oh,
00:59:05yes,
00:59:05here was the
00:59:06story about
00:59:06the 11th Airborne
00:59:07Division being
00:59:08on standby.
00:59:09This is
00:59:10Soldier of Fortune
00:59:11Magazine,
00:59:12on standby for
00:59:12possible deployment
00:59:13to Minnesota,
00:59:15although I don't
00:59:18think that's
00:59:18necessarily the
00:59:19case.
00:59:19This person
00:59:20says that
00:59:23Minnesota would
00:59:23be a good
00:59:24place to
00:59:25stage these
00:59:25forces in
00:59:26the lower
00:59:2648 to
00:59:28prep them.
00:59:29For Greenland,
00:59:30people are
00:59:31convinced that
00:59:32they're sending
00:59:33you in the
00:59:3411th Airborne
00:59:34Division into
00:59:36Minnesota because
00:59:37there's now a
00:59:39potential conflict
00:59:40between
00:59:40ICE and the
00:59:45Minnesota National
00:59:45Guard,
00:59:46which Tim
00:59:47Wallace has
00:59:47called up to
00:59:48restore order.
00:59:50So,
00:59:50you're going to
00:59:52see this because
00:59:53it's been all over
00:59:54social media,
00:59:55not just Twitter,
00:59:56but elsewhere.
00:59:57You're going to
00:59:57see this.
00:59:58We have no proof
00:59:59that the 11th
00:59:59Airborne is going
01:00:00to Minnesota,
01:00:01so just slow
01:00:01that roll.
01:00:02They're probably
01:00:03preparing to go
01:00:03to Greenland,
01:00:04which is a
01:00:05whole other
01:00:05problem and a
01:00:06whole other
01:00:06matter.
01:00:08But from a
01:00:09narrative perspective,
01:00:10you're going to
01:00:11see stuff like
01:00:12this.
01:00:14And this is
01:00:14where it's
01:00:14so kind of
01:00:16confusing right
01:00:17now because
01:00:19oh, this was
01:00:21the original
01:00:22post about
01:00:23the Nobel Prize.
01:00:28There's so
01:00:28much going on
01:00:29right now.
01:00:30It's so
01:00:31crazy.
01:00:33This post was
01:00:34very emblematic.
01:00:35It says the
01:00:35president is
01:00:36occupying a
01:00:37major city with
01:00:37armed paramilitaries.
01:00:41Is black
01:00:42meaning treaty
01:00:42allies to hand
01:00:43over their
01:00:43sovereign territory.
01:00:44fair.
01:00:46Is trying to
01:00:47set himself as
01:00:47the chairman
01:00:47for life of a
01:00:49UN rival with
01:00:50$1 billion fees
01:00:51for permanent
01:00:51membership.
01:00:52That's his
01:00:52peace council.
01:00:53And he's talking
01:00:54about canceling
01:00:55elections, which
01:00:56Trump talks about
01:00:57casually all the
01:00:57time and can't be
01:00:58taken seriously
01:00:58until he does
01:00:59something.
01:01:00There's so much
01:01:01going on right
01:01:01now, but
01:01:02particularly the
01:01:03situation in
01:01:05Minnesota is so
01:01:07difficult because
01:01:09you have this
01:01:11immigration
01:01:12situation, you
01:01:13have this
01:01:14massive corruption
01:01:14scandal, you
01:01:15now have people
01:01:16getting shot, and
01:01:17here's the
01:01:17problem with
01:01:18violence.
01:01:18Once violence
01:01:19starts, it's
01:01:20easy for it to
01:01:20escalate.
01:01:21Like, it's very
01:01:22easy for violence
01:01:24to beget more
01:01:25violence both
01:01:26ways.
01:01:26You see this
01:01:27with insurgency
01:01:28groups, you see
01:01:30this with things
01:01:31all the time.
01:01:32Violence is very
01:01:33good at making
01:01:34more violence.
01:01:35And my worry
01:01:36is that as we
01:01:38have more people
01:01:39protesting, more
01:01:40people trying to
01:01:41stop ICE, and
01:01:42not even at the
01:01:42right address,
01:01:44then there's
01:01:47going to be more
01:01:47opportunities for
01:01:48more conflict to
01:01:49occur.
01:01:50And as more
01:01:51conflict occurs,
01:01:53and it gets, you
01:01:54know, even worse,
01:01:55it gets more and
01:01:56more dangerous, and
01:01:57the chances for a
01:01:59larger and more
01:02:00protracted conflict
01:02:01get even worse.
01:02:02And for historical
01:02:03reference, you can
01:02:03see things like
01:02:04Kent State,
01:02:05there are other
01:02:06instances where
01:02:08that has happened
01:02:08and you've ended
01:02:09up with a quite,
01:02:11Kent State wasn't
01:02:11a huge loss of
01:02:12life, it was more
01:02:13psychological, only
01:02:13a few people died,
01:02:14but violence does
01:02:15beget more violence,
01:02:17and that is its
01:02:18own danger and
01:02:21its own thing.
01:02:24Oh, yes, that's
01:02:24the Trump-Russia
01:02:25thing, I'll talk
01:02:26about the newsletter.
01:02:29Oh, yes, with
01:02:31the not wanting
01:02:33to do elections,
01:02:34the preservation
01:02:34of our nation
01:02:35is more important
01:02:36than elections.
01:02:37Prepare to see a
01:02:38lot more talking
01:02:38points like this
01:02:39rolling out next.
01:02:39You don't preserve
01:02:40a nation by
01:02:40discarding elections,
01:02:41you dismantle it.
01:02:44That, yeah,
01:02:45narratively speaking,
01:02:47yes, you could hear
01:02:49this a lot more,
01:02:51and that is
01:02:53something we should
01:02:53all be very, very
01:02:54concerned about,
01:02:55but it is, oh, now
01:03:01this was good.
01:03:02We're going to save
01:03:03that for next week,
01:03:04and we're going to
01:03:04save that for the
01:03:06newsletter, but this
01:03:08is, this is good.
01:03:10This is from David
01:03:11Sirota.
01:03:13Things are bad in
01:03:14the right now, but
01:03:15some perspective
01:03:16helps.
01:03:17Not too long ago,
01:03:18leaders of both
01:03:18parties forcibly sent
01:03:20American teenagers to
01:03:21die in Southeast Asia,
01:03:22and then they had
01:03:23lied the country into
01:03:25another war that
01:03:26cost one trillion
01:03:26dollars and killed a
01:03:27million people, all
01:03:28while the economy was
01:03:29being rigged for
01:03:30bankers and billionaires
01:03:31to loot everything.
01:03:32Maybe the past
01:03:33politicians seem to
01:03:34like you, seem to
01:03:35you like nicer dudes
01:03:36than the current
01:03:37White House occupant,
01:03:38but things have been
01:03:39going in the wrong
01:03:40direction for a very
01:03:41long time, and even
01:03:42if you weren't paying
01:03:43as much attention
01:03:43because everyone
01:03:44had been a little
01:03:45bit more polite.
01:03:46The fact is, much
01:03:47of what we're living
01:03:47through now is less
01:03:49an anomaly and more
01:03:50a horrible culmination.
01:03:52I said fuck
01:03:56yeah David Stroud
01:03:56when I read this
01:03:57this morning, and
01:03:58that kind of loops
01:03:59back to the J.D.
01:04:00Vance video, actually.
01:04:03Like, this isn't
01:04:05the end.
01:04:07It's, I don't know
01:04:07why I don't follow
01:04:08David Stroud, he's
01:04:08from Denver even.
01:04:12It loops back to
01:04:12the J.D.
01:04:13Vance video.
01:04:13This is, we're at
01:04:15the end of that, all
01:04:17that stuff I said
01:04:17about the gold
01:04:18standard and Nixon
01:04:19and inflation, blah,
01:04:19blah, blah, this
01:04:20is the end, and
01:04:21this summarizes it.
01:04:23So, damn well.
01:04:26We didn't get here
01:04:27overnight.
01:04:29We did not get here
01:04:30overnight.
01:04:32And even given the
01:04:33things that are
01:04:34happening in Minnesota,
01:04:35the things that are
01:04:35happening in Iran,
01:04:37Greenland, ICE,
01:04:39you know, the
01:04:40protests last year in
01:04:41L.A., all this type
01:04:42of thing, this did not
01:04:43happen overnight.
01:04:44We didn't get here
01:04:45overnight.
01:04:46And it's seven
01:04:46after the hour, I
01:04:47gotta go.
01:04:48But we did not get
01:04:49here overnight.
01:04:49And we will, we
01:04:50will pick up, um, we
01:04:53will pick up, uh, you
01:04:56know, next week with
01:04:57more stories in the
01:04:57newsletter.
01:04:58Um, but I, I'm
01:04:59going to close on
01:05:00this one.
01:05:00It's from Insider
01:05:01Wire.
01:05:01And it says the FBI
01:05:03asks agents
01:05:04nationwide to
01:05:06deploy temporarily
01:05:07to Minneapolis.
01:05:11And, um, and this
01:05:13is one of the people
01:05:13trying to say that the
01:05:1411th Airborne is going
01:05:15to, is going to
01:05:16Minnesota.
01:05:16Minnesota, and it
01:05:17says, let me set the
01:05:18scene, 40 plus Jag
01:05:19lawyers, elite cold
01:05:20weather paratroopers
01:05:21from the army, 3,000
01:05:23lawless Gestapo on the
01:05:24ground, they're talking
01:05:25about ICE, um, and
01:05:26hundreds of FBI agents.
01:05:28Trump is setting up and
01:05:29testing out a coup on
01:05:30the state level, likely
01:05:31under the guise of
01:05:32federal fraud and
01:05:33rebellion.
01:05:34Minnesota is a, is the
01:05:35test case for total
01:05:36takeover by a
01:05:37dictatorial regime
01:05:38nationwide.
01:05:39Let that sink in.
01:05:40I don't think we're
01:05:41there yet.
01:05:43I'll say it.
01:05:44I don't think the
01:05:44airborne, the 11th
01:05:45Airborne is going to
01:05:46Minnesota.
01:05:47Um, I wouldn't
01:05:48necessarily refer to
01:05:49ICE as lawless
01:05:49Gestapo.
01:05:50Um, I think FBI
01:05:52agents going up there
01:05:53has probably a lot less
01:05:54to do with between
01:05:55the streets and a lot
01:05:56more to do with
01:05:57forensic accounting,
01:05:58um, which it appears
01:06:00that they need.
01:06:01Um, I think that, you
01:06:04know, is more, more
01:06:05into all of, into all
01:06:07of, all of that.
01:06:08Um, the 40 plus Jag
01:06:10lawyers, I'm not quite
01:06:11sure what that's for
01:06:12or about.
01:06:13Um, but you don't
01:06:13send in the lawyers
01:06:14unless you're planning
01:06:15on having legal
01:06:15issues.
01:06:16Um, I don't
01:06:18necessarily know
01:06:18that's what's going
01:06:18on in Minnesota or
01:06:20in Minneapolis.
01:06:21I think, I think
01:06:23there is a frustration
01:06:24in the country,
01:06:26especially with the
01:06:27corruption scandal,
01:06:28that there's a lot
01:06:29of waste going on,
01:06:30a lot of money
01:06:31going on.
01:06:32It's the narrative
01:06:32that blue cities
01:06:33and blue states
01:06:34are corrupt,
01:06:35ran by corrupt
01:06:35Democrats, and
01:06:36here's the reality.
01:06:37It's going to be
01:06:37very, very hard
01:06:38electorally to
01:06:39convince people to
01:06:40let Democrats be in
01:06:41charge when you
01:06:42have things like
01:06:42Minnesota happening.
01:06:43And New York and
01:06:44California are next.
01:06:46Trump has already
01:06:46said so.
01:06:47Hell, the bottom
01:06:48scroll in the one
01:06:49video about the guy
01:06:50saying libtards
01:06:51literally said they're
01:06:52already training
01:06:53Antifa people in
01:06:54New York City to
01:06:55resist ICE and all
01:06:56this sort of thing.
01:06:57this whole situation
01:06:59is getting out of
01:07:00control in more
01:07:02ways than one.
01:07:03Unfortunately, I
01:07:04don't think anyone
01:07:05has any restraint
01:07:06on either side.
01:07:07Antifa, different
01:07:08leftist groups and
01:07:09all this type of
01:07:10thing will be
01:07:11absolutely as crazy
01:07:12and what happens
01:07:13with these sorts of
01:07:14things with, you
01:07:16know, an insurgency
01:07:17versus a regime is
01:07:19you get these sort of
01:07:20leveling up of
01:07:21violence.
01:07:22You even see it in
01:07:23Iran.
01:07:24The more the regime
01:07:24cracks down, the
01:07:25larger the protests
01:07:26and the more
01:07:26violent they get,
01:07:27we're kind of going
01:07:28through the same
01:07:29thing.
01:07:30You know, the more
01:07:31sophisticated the
01:07:32protesters get, the
01:07:33more the federal
01:07:34government will come
01:07:34down.
01:07:35The more sophisticated
01:07:36the protesters get,
01:07:37the more the federal
01:07:37government will come
01:07:38down.
01:07:38It ends up just
01:07:39being a cycle that
01:07:40gets bigger and
01:07:41bigger and bigger
01:07:41and bigger.
01:07:42And I was even
01:07:43telling someone this
01:07:45afternoon, I said
01:07:46it's probably not
01:07:46going to be men in
01:07:47uniforms shooting at
01:07:48each other.
01:07:49It's going to be
01:07:49more like the
01:07:50troubles in Northern
01:07:52Ireland.
01:07:53Bus explosions, you
01:07:54know, with tax
01:07:56and nails that
01:07:57kill and maim
01:07:58people terribly and
01:07:59horribly.
01:08:00And that's a very
01:08:01hard thing to stop
01:08:03once it gets
01:08:03started.
01:08:04And that could be
01:08:05what we're really
01:08:06facing.
01:08:07And on that
01:08:08terrible note, I'm
01:08:10going to save these
01:08:10other stories for
01:08:11next week because
01:08:12they are interesting.
01:08:13Although not that
01:08:14one because that
01:08:14one's important for
01:08:15today, but we're
01:08:16not going to watch
01:08:16it right now.
01:08:16It's like a half
01:08:17hour.
01:08:18We're going to save
01:08:19all that for next
01:08:20week.
01:08:20Um, and I am
01:08:22going to, uh, let
01:08:24you all go.
01:08:25Uh, my name is
01:08:26Cameron Cowan.
01:08:27This is the Cameron
01:08:28Journal News
01:08:28Hour.
01:08:29Um, you can find
01:08:30me online at
01:08:31Cameron Cowan on
01:08:33Twitter and
01:08:34Instagram, facebook.com
01:08:36slash Cameron L.
01:08:36Cowan on Facebook,
01:08:37um, and at Cameron
01:08:38Journal on TikTok,
01:08:39which is always fun.
01:08:41And, uh, don't
01:08:42forget to subscribe to
01:08:43the newsletter,
01:08:43CameronJournal.substack.com
01:08:45or CameronJournal.com
01:08:46slash newsletter.
01:08:48And I will see you
01:08:49all next Monday for
01:08:51this show, the
01:08:51Cameron Journal News
01:08:52Hour.
01:08:53But before then, I'll
01:08:54see you on Wednesday
01:08:54on The Living Joke with
01:08:55Will and Connor.
01:08:56We have a lot of fun
01:08:57stuff to talk about,
01:08:58um, this week.
01:08:59And when I say fun
01:09:00stuff, I mean the
01:09:01things that we'll
01:09:01figure out tomorrow
01:09:02that we're going to
01:09:03talk about, and we're
01:09:04going to have a grand
01:09:04old time.
01:09:05So, thank you all so
01:09:06much for bearing with
01:09:06me this evening.
01:09:07Thank you all so much
01:09:08for, uh, being a part
01:09:09of the Cameron
01:09:10Journal family, and I
01:09:12will see you next
01:09:12week on the Cameron
01:09:13Journal News
01:09:14Hour.
01:09:14Thank you so much.
01:09:15Good night.
Comments