Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Transcript
00:00There's a good business there. I mean, there's a loyal customer base. There are probably,
00:04I would imagine, I don't know, 500,000 to a million high net worth individuals in their
00:10customer databases. So there's one incredible asset. If you look at just the New York City
00:16stores, of which there are three, two Bergdorf, one SACs, obviously, those two stores combined
00:22probably do one to $1.5 billion. Their e-commerce business as a whole is probably around 25%
00:29of the entire $7.5 billion. So just those three stores and an e-commerce business, obviously,
00:37which would be smaller because it wouldn't get the power, that e-commerce business of the fleet
00:42of stores were they to be closed. I think there is a kernel of truth within that business. And
00:49that business can flourish and be hugely profitable, but probably not at the scale that it is today.
00:55And I think that, am I saying that they should reduce to three stores? No. But I think they'll
01:01have to take a hard look at, you know, what's the way to start? What would you do if you had a blank
01:06sheet of paper, which they, in essence, now do, and then build from there as opposed to doing the
01:12reverse, which is to say, OK, we'll trim 25% of stores. I think there's going to be a look at
01:18the entirety from, you know, first principles and maybe learn a few things about the concession
01:24model in Europe and see whether that's applicable here. And by the way, and this is the last point,
01:30using those incredible brands as luxury service platforms to sell other goods and services,
01:37not just obviously fashion and accessories, such as, you know, hospitality, travel, art advisory.
01:45I mean, you know, the spend of the luxury consumer today is incredibly heavy and that consumer is
01:53flourishing. Sure. But ultimately, you know, these stores are only selling them a certain piece of
01:59their share of wallet. Oh, does SAC still have a decent relationship with its vendors? Eliza was
02:05telling us earlier about how, you know, they were not paying their vendors on time at the end of last
02:10year. And that must have damaged some of those relationships, that trust. Well, I don't,
02:15I don't know the specifics, but what I can say is that from, I think, well before the merger,
02:23there was this, let's call it slow pay happening within the industry from SACs. I think that
02:29obviously was exacerbated going into 2025 when things didn't go maybe as planned synergies and also the
02:36direction of revenues. And so I do think there are, there are some issues and there are many big brands
02:44and not, not so big brands owed a lot of money. And I think that is going to be a somewhat contentious
02:51affair, I'd imagine. But nonetheless, both sides probably need each other to some extent.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended