Skip to player
Skip to main content
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Bookmark
Share
More
Add to Playlist
Report
Fed Frontrunner Hassett a 'Credible' Economist, Says Citi's Kaiser
Bloomberg
Follow
3 days ago
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Our Bloomberg News team broke a story about Kevin Hassett of the National Economic Council,
00:05
White House Economic Council, becoming the key emerging person who could become the next Fed
00:12
chair. We saw markets react. We saw yields on twos and tens move lower. We saw stocks go higher.
00:18
What was your reaction to the possibility of a Fed chair Hassett?
00:21
I think Hassett's been on sort of the short list with Kevin Walsh and maybe Rick Reeder and,
00:25
you know, war maybe for a period of time now. So, you know, not too surprising that, you know,
00:30
somewhat out of that core group is sort of being called the favorite. I'd probably tamp the brakes
00:34
on exactly knowing what the outcome here is, because, you know, President Trump has tended to
00:38
bounce around back and forth between the various candidates. But I think, look, I think Walsh,
00:42
Hassett, Reeder are all considered, you know, very credible economists, you know, very,
00:46
very deeply understand macro markets. Is Hassett credible?
00:49
Yeah, I think I think Hassett is from an economics perspective on the credible side of things,
00:54
without a doubt. And if that's the case, then, you know, you're it's not too big an issue,
00:59
you know, depending on who they settle from from that group.
01:02
But but would Kevin Hassett be a good and independent Fed chair? He is certainly seen
01:07
as somebody who would bring President Trump's approach to interest rates and cutting specifically
01:12
to the Fed, which President Trump has long wanted to control, at least according to those folks who
01:16
we've been talking to in all of our reporting. And so maybe that is why he is coming out as the
01:22
front runner runner. So I guess the question is, is would Kevin Hassett be independent? Would he
01:26
lower or raise rates based on the Fed's mandate and not on the president's preference?
01:31
I mean, you have to assume so. I mean, remember, Trump appointed
01:34
appointed Powell, and now he doesn't consider Powell to be dovish enough. So, you know, I would say,
01:38
you know, Supreme Court justices, Fed chairs. I mean, these people are generally pretty,
01:43
pretty reputable people that respect the value and the independence of the organization. And you would
01:47
hope he's going to make decisions based on on the incoming data. Clearly, a president is going to
01:51
pick a chair that is consistent with their view. So, you know, it wouldn't surprise you that maybe
01:56
Trump would settle on someone that skews a touch more dovish. But but the fact is that whoever the
02:01
chair is, is walking into what's basically a split FOMC right now. That FOMC is also filled with 12
02:07
other people who are very reputable economists who are not simply going to be kind of pushed around.
02:12
And I think we're going to respect the data, respect the dual mandate as well. So it's not as if
02:16
you're appointing someone that goes in and just, you know, makes the decision. Right. So again,
02:20
I think all the three of the three or four of the core candidates, I think, are pretty well
02:24
respected economists. They're entering an institution which you would assume they would,
02:28
you know, respect and support. You know, every every chair is going to have a little bit of a
02:33
hawkish or a dovish tilt or maybe a little more focus on inflation versus a little more focus on
02:38
focus on the growth mandate. And that's fine. I don't think that that is that that's particularly
02:43
offsides or inconsistent with history. So, yeah, I mean, I think any of those core would be fine.
02:47
So let's talk markets. Yeah, let's talk markets. I mean, we just talked about with our Ian King
02:52
about what's going on in terms of Alphabet versus NVIDIA, who wins, who not. I mean,
02:56
Alphabet's been on tear this year, Stu. I mean, it's up about 70 percent year to date. You do see
03:02
the markets remaining unsettled with core leaders under pressure. How do you define unsettled when
03:07
it comes to markets? What are you looking at and what does this mean maybe over the next six months,
03:11
12 months? Yeah, I think unsettled is kind of what we've seen really for the last month or so,
03:15
which is for four kind of key things have changed in our view that have made the markets a little
03:20
squishier. The first is that retail is pulled back considerably. And whether you believe or don't
03:25
believe that retail is driving the market, certainly institutional investors are aware of that shift
03:29
in supply demand. So, again, that's created a little bit uncertainty. AI, the reaction function
03:34
of AI has clearly shifted, whether that is Meta or Palantir or Oracle or NVIDIA. And you can't ignore
03:40
that. The third thing is retail. Retail earnings were soft and the commentary from management was
03:46
very, very cautious. We just got a pretty weak retail sales number as well. So regardless of
03:52
all the rest of it, people are saying, wait a second, this U.S. consumer has been the white
03:55
knight of the economy and global economy probably for multiple years. And now it seems a little bit
04:00
under pressure. And then last would be the Fed. Some uncertainty there. So not all of those
04:04
uncertainties. It's a lot. Yeah. And in and of themselves, each one of these might not be an
04:10
issue, but you put them all together and they've created some uncertainty. You're also in a tricky
04:13
time of the calendar. You have portfolio managers who have portfolio managers, excuse me, who've had
04:18
a really tough year. Yeah. If you're up here to date, you're not going to play hero ball between now
04:22
and the end of the year as well. So I think you've made people a little more cautious for a lot of
04:26
reasons. So I think right now it's hard to have a really, really strong tactical view. You know,
04:31
if we had to pick one, we're going to pick higher into year end. We do think ultimately you get a
04:35
rate cut and the seasonality pushes you there. But the risk reward around that is not nearly
04:39
what it was a couple of months ago. What changes your view between now and the year end where
04:42
you'd say, actually, we're not thinking higher till year end now? Yeah, the data, you know,
04:47
probably December 16th would probably be the single most important date on the calendar,
04:50
which is going to be, you know, dual dual payrolls reports. Our view is the unemployment rate is if you
04:56
had to pick one thing is the single most important thing for for the market. So that's going to be a
05:00
very important day. Before we get there, you know, Black Friday, Cyber Monday will be important.
05:05
But the single biggest day is December 16th. And to remind everybody that comes six days after we
05:09
hear from Fed Chair Jay Powell and the entire Federal Reserve, the FOMC, is going at this without the
05:15
typical data that it has ahead of a Fed decision. Yeah, 100 percent. I mean, and you're also getting
05:19
the inflation print on the 18th. So you can imagine a situation where the Fed cuts 25 basis points,
05:25
tells you they're data dependent in 2026. And then, boom, you get hit with really weak labor markets
05:29
the next week and vice versa. Somebody like I'm not I'm not saying, you know, either or is going to
05:34
happen. But our view at this point is the logic behind the rate decision is as important as whether
05:39
they cut or not. Right. If they don't cut and it's because the labor market looks solid and the
05:44
beige book is very positive. That's good. If they do cut in the market site, wait, you all look like
05:49
you might be behind the curve a little bit because the next week we get weak labor markets less good.
05:54
So really, we are we are data dependent, probably a meeting before we expect it to be.
05:59
But if you're asking what could change my view into year end to become more bearish, it should be we
06:03
get some weak holiday spending data. And then that labor market report is unfriendly to the markets.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Recommended
6:47
|
Up next
Oliver Chen: Retail's Single Best Buy
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
5:28
Fed Minutes Show Officials Leaning to Keep Rates Steady
Bloomberg
1 week ago
6:12
Bessent Names Fed Chair Finalists Ahead of Year End Decision
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
14:34
Fed's Kashkari Says Shock of Tariffs Is 'Stagflationary'
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
5:40
Spending Slowdown Risking US 'Jenga Tower' Economy
Bloomberg
3 weeks ago
4:15
AI Fixated Fed Not Ready to Make a Greenspan-Size Bet
Bloomberg
4 days ago
4:10
Blue Owl Scraps Merger of Private Credit Funds After Selloff
Bloomberg
1 week ago
1:26
Fed Is Apolitical: Contopoulos
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
1:40
Bessent Names Five Finalists for Federal Reserve Chair
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
2:59
Fed May Cut Rates Sooner Than Expected, Beschloss Says
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
4:11
Polls Indicate Many Americans Downbeat on Trump's Handling of Economy
Bloomberg
3 weeks ago
5:03
Trump's Family Makes a Deposit With Citigroup
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
4:25
Economy Propped Up By Three 'A-Pillars,' Says EY's Daco
Bloomberg
6 days ago
11:27
Barclays Bank President on Markets, Trade
Bloomberg
4 weeks ago
7:09
US Hurtles Towards Shutdown, Parties at Impasse
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
1:58
Fed Meeting in October Will Be Tricky, Wilding Says
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
7:36
US Economy 'Deeply Unbalanced' Says Dutta
Bloomberg
2 weeks ago
4:31
Page Says Big US Tech Companies 'Are Awesome'
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
4:22
Tech Giants Fuel Wall Street's Cautious Comeback
Bloomberg
2 weeks ago
2:53
Fed Rate Cuts 'Will Definitely Help' Asian Central Banks, Morgan Stanley's Ahya Says
Bloomberg
2 days ago
2:37
BofA's Mensah Says Recession Projections Have Diminished
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
2:28
Jobs Market Gets Worse Before It Gets Better, Goncalves Says
Bloomberg
2 weeks ago
3:25
Greed Has Taken Over the News Business: Connie Chung
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
5:11
Fed's Daly, Hammack on Outlook for US Economy
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
4:39
Market Slump a 'Healthy Correction,' Says Robinhood CIO
Bloomberg
1 week ago
Be the first to comment