Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 10 hours ago

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00The question of our audience is very good, but what is the problem, it is the word
00:24it is clear, it is right, the problem is that nothing is clear, it is to say that we have
00:31a resolution that first employs for the first time the term of perhaps, here I talk
00:37of a future state palestinian, perhaps, it is still going to do it, but also
00:43when the launch of this international force, we don't know which country will be mobilized,
00:50we don't know where the soldiers will be deployed, and above all, they will be their
00:56prerogative, and that is a real problem, if you will, the intention is very good, first
01:02because it is still to remet in selle the Palestinian Authority, I remember that this
01:06Palestinian Authority is the only Palestinian organization legal and legitimate
01:11from the international point of view, obviously not at all, it is considered
01:14to be a terrorist terrorist, but from the other side, the Israelis have nothing to do
01:18in the band of Gaza, and there also, all the international resolutions
01:23onusiennes depuis 48, enfin 47, the partage of the Palestine and 48,
01:28they say that Israel has nothing to do in Gaza, so if it is not Israel
01:31or the Hamas, it is not that the Palestinian Authority, sauf that,
01:34from a point of view military, it is not today in the capacity
01:37to go affronter the Hamas in the tunnels.
01:39For coming, excuse me, Frédéric Ancel, the text is more or less clear, I
01:44mean, there are four missions précises,
01:47sécuriser the borders of Gaza with Israel and Egypt, protection of the civilians,
01:50participer to the operations humanitaires, démilitariser
01:53l'enclave palestinienne.
01:54But you have to say, all of that, these are very clear objectives
01:58and very clear, but how to do it?
02:01If I ask you the question, consistant to know how to
02:04do the Hamas in the decombs and tunnels?
02:07You see, after, is it a resolution onusiennes
02:11that should be technically and militarily
02:14the way to do it, maybe not.
02:16But what is true, is that today, you have to do a group
02:19very concretely radical, who tells you that
02:22we will say, well, no, no, no, no, no, no,
02:24we will not be militarized.
02:25And from the other side, the Arab states,
02:27which no regime regime who resides their destination
02:29will take the responsibility of
02:32to envoy the soldiers to do face the Hamas in the tunnels.
02:36However, we are talking about Egypt,
02:38the Qatar also, the Indonesia.
02:41Yes, but wait, we are talking about Egypt,
02:44the Qatar, the Indonésie,
02:46to maintain the calm in the population,
02:50to ensure the provision of the Palestinian population
02:53and ensure the order.
02:55But again once again,
02:57is it that Egyptian soldiers will take the responsibility
03:00of dying face to the combatants of Hamas
03:04who will decide that it will not be
03:06to control the border of Gaza?
03:11Excellent question.
03:15Pour moi, c'est la traduction très concrète
03:22de ce que je dis et écrit depuis longtemps.
03:24Ni la Russie ni la Chine n'ont d'une part
03:27la capacité d'intervenir sérieusement au Moyen-Orient,
03:30on le voit bien, où les États-Unis restent de très loin
03:33la seule et unique puissance prédominante à tout point de vue,
03:37contrairement à ce que beaucoup d'observateurs très paresseux disaient
03:40ces années et les années.
03:41Et d'autre part, c'est l'illustration que,
03:43contrairement à ce qui est indiqué,
03:46mais de très bonne foi dans la question,
03:48en fait, ils ne sont pas alliés à la cause palestinienne.
03:51La Russie de Poutine est extrêmement duplice
03:54avec ses alliés, on l'a bien vu avec Assad l'an dernier en Syrie,
03:57c'est le moins qu'on puisse dire.
03:58Quant à la Chine, elle n'a aucune espèce d'alliance militaire
04:01sauf la Corée du Nord qui est un cas un peu à part depuis 1953.
04:04Donc, en fait, on ne peut pas les considérer comme alliés,
04:06c'est la raison pour laquelle elles ont,
04:08face à une quasi-unanimité internationale derrière le plan Trump,
04:11décidé de faire contre-mauvaise fortune bon cœur et de s'abstenir.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended