Venezuela exige a la ONU condenar despliegue militar de EE.UU. en el Caribe

teleSUR tv

El gobierno de Venezuela, a través de su representante Samuel Moncada en la ONU, exige condenar el despliegue militar de EE.UU. en el Caribe, calificándolo de agresión que viola el derecho internacional. Venezuela rechaza estas acciones, defendiendo sus ejercicios militares como respuesta defensiva a una amenaza externa y exhorta a EE.UU. a retirar sus activos de la región.teleSUR

Transcript

00:00Estamos aquí en la Unión de las Naciones, donde hemos dejado un mensaje a la Secretaría General

00:04que ha dejado el comentario continuo de los comentarios de su expresión

00:08sobre la construcción de los militares de nuestros costos.

00:12Diciendo la falta de actos de la Secretaría General para abordar este tema,

00:17que hemos abordado varias veces con él, por propiedades,

00:22estamos ahora haciendo esta denuncia publica,

00:25en la esperanza de que este pattern se termine una vez por todos.

00:30Ahora voy a leer la letra que fue entregado a la Secretaría General

00:35sobre este tema, en la que nos espera una respuesta formal.

00:39Aquí es la letra.

00:40Distinguido Secretaría General,

00:43Once again, I am compelled to address Your Excellency

00:46en la oportunidad de referirme a los comentarios

00:48made en el 12 de diciembre de 2025

00:51de Mr. Estefan Dujerrique,

00:54spokesperson de la Secretaría General

00:56durante su daily press briefing.

00:58In that regard,

01:00I would like to convey our profound dismay

01:02and categorical rejection

01:04at what now seems to be a recurrent issue,

01:07namely,

01:08the biased remarks from your spokesperson

01:10when it comes to addressing questions

01:13concerning the escalating situation

01:15of the coast of Venezuela,

01:17resulting from a U.S. military buildup

01:19in the Caribbean

01:20and the perpetration of extrajudicial killings

01:24in international waters.

01:26In his later remarks,

01:28yet again,

01:29your spokesperson called for the situation

01:32to be de-escalated,

01:34a call that was surprisingly made equally

01:37to both the United States of America

01:39and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

01:41This is a grave misrepresentation of the facts

01:46and an immoral equivalence

01:48between the aggressor and the victim.

01:51I extensively addressed this very issue

01:53during our last bilateral meeting

01:55on August 28, 2025.

01:58At that time,

02:00you indicated that

02:01the comments made by your spokesperson

02:03may have been response

02:05to a question that caught him off guard,

02:09reason why he had provided

02:10a standard diplomatic response.

02:14Since then,

02:15two additional episodes

02:16of the same nature

02:18have been registered.

02:19We cannot but conclude

02:21that this is no longer an oversight,

02:23but a clearly assumed position

02:25by the Secretariat.

02:26in disregard for the concerns

02:29that's then expressed.

02:31Excellency,

02:33it is not

02:34the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

02:36the one conducting hostile actions,

02:38provocative,

02:39intimidatory maneuvers

02:41and a few miles from the territory

02:43of the United States of America

02:44with B-1 bombers

02:46flying directly towards US airspace.

02:50It is not

02:51the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

02:53the one deploying

02:54large numbers of military assets

02:56and troops,

02:58including a nuclear submarine,

03:00a few miles from the territory

03:01of the United States of America.

03:03It is not

03:05the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

03:07the one deploying

03:08the world's largest aircraft carrier

03:10a few miles from the territory

03:12of the United States of America.

03:14It is not

03:16the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

03:18the one that has conducted

03:19almost 20 airstrikes

03:22on small fishermen boats

03:24on small fishermen boats

03:24a few miles from the territory

03:25of the United States of America

03:27in which over 70 civilians

03:29have been subjected

03:31to extrajudicial killings

03:33which is a technical plan for murder.

03:36It is not the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

03:38the one that poses a threat

03:40to the territorial integrity

03:42and political independence

03:43of the United States of America

03:45or any other sovereign nation.

03:49The defensive

03:50and sovereign decision

03:51of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

03:53to conduct military exercises

03:55within its own territory

03:57in response to explicit

03:59and imminent foreign threat

04:01it is a legitimate right

04:02of any states

04:03of the United Nations.

04:06These actions

04:07of self-preservation

04:08can in no way

04:10be equated

04:11with those

04:12of an offensive nature

04:13as currently executed

04:15by the United States of America.

04:17Excellency

04:18it is evident

04:19it is not

04:20the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

04:22the one escalating

04:23the situation

04:24on the ground

04:25in any possible manner.

04:28Hence

04:28the question

04:29to both you

04:30and your spokesperson

04:31would be

04:31why to continue

04:33pushing

04:34a discourse

04:35that is baseless

04:36that has no connection

04:38whatsoever

04:39with facts

04:39on the ground

04:40and that only serves

04:42to the narrative

04:43of a warmongering regime.

04:46This false parity

04:47only ends up

04:49endorsing

04:49the ongoing

04:50U.S. aggression

04:51against our nation

04:52as it strives

04:54to fabricate

04:55a conflict

04:55while at the same time

04:57questions

04:57the precautionary

04:58defense measures

04:59taken by our government

05:01within our borders

05:03in line

05:04with our inherent

05:05right to self-defense

05:07pursuant

05:08to Article 51

05:09of the U.N. Charter.

05:11The conduct

05:12of your spokesperson

05:13attests

05:14to a clear pattern

05:15in which he ignores

05:17the root cause

05:17generating tensions

05:19on the ground

05:20the unlawful

05:21and coercive

05:22actions

05:23of the government

05:24of the United States

05:24of America

05:25as part of an exercise

05:27aimed at destroying

05:29our Republican

05:30form of government

05:31and imposing

05:33a puppet regime.

05:35This conduct

05:36amounts to a violation

05:38of both

05:39the letter

05:40and spirit

05:40of Article 100

05:42of the U.N. Charter

05:43dangerously abandoning

05:45the neutrality,

05:46impartiality,

05:47and rigor

05:48expected

05:48of an international

05:49official.

05:50By refusing

05:52to identify

05:52the aggressor

05:53and instead

05:55issuing vague

05:56symmetrical calls

05:57for de-escalations,

05:58your spokesperson

05:59is failing

06:00in his duty

06:01to uphold

06:02the principles

06:03enshrined in the

06:03Charter of the United Nations,

06:06particularly

06:06the one referring

06:07to the prohibition

06:08on the threat

06:10of use of force

06:10against the

06:11territorial integrity

06:12and political independence

06:14of any state

06:15as contained

06:16in Article 2.4.

06:17Considering the foregoing

06:20and while respectfully

06:21reiterating

06:23the arguments

06:23shared

06:24in our previous letters,

06:26I demand

06:26that your office

06:27take immediate

06:28and public action

06:29to

06:291.

06:31set the record

06:32straight

06:32by unambiguously

06:33identifying

06:34the source

06:35of the escalation

06:36and conveying

06:37the provocative

06:38U.S. military

06:39deployment

06:39in the Caribbean

06:40off the coast

06:41of Venezuela.

06:432.

06:44Call upon

06:45the government

06:45of the United States

06:46of America

06:47to immediately

06:48withdraw

06:49its military assets

06:50from the region,

06:52to seize

06:52its threats

06:53of force

06:53and its

06:54judicial killing

06:55policies

06:55against the

06:56Bolivarian Republic

06:57of Venezuela,

06:59and to pursue

06:59diplomacy

07:00and cooperation

07:01as the only

07:02viable means

07:03to redress

07:04any issue

07:05of contention.

07:073.

07:08The last one

07:08ensure

07:09that future

07:10statements

07:11from the

07:12spokesperson

07:12office

07:13are impartial,

07:14grounded

07:15in international law,

07:16and do not

07:17equate

07:17the victim

07:18of aggression

07:18with the aggressor.

07:21I thank you

07:21for your attention

07:23to this important

07:24issue

07:24that goes

07:25to the core

07:26of preserving

07:27the very integrity,

07:28neutrality

07:29and independence

07:30of the United Nations

07:31as an international

07:32organization.

07:33cooperation.

07:34Thank you.

07:35Thank you.

Categoría

Transcripción

Sé la primera persona en añadir un comentario

Recomendada