00:00So we need to grab the jo
00:04and I wanted to grab the
00:07and heath Marvin are read
00:09their home on a moment's
00:12faith. It really drives u
00:15James says it true undefi
00:19care for the fatherless.
00:22reconfigured their home t
00:24foster children, including
00:27medical needs for 15 mo
00:31were up three at least th
00:34to their own three kids.
00:36ready to keep going until
00:39of Children and families
00:41last spring. Now that it
00:44there's no path forward.
00:47have young children in our
00:52how long we didn't know,
00:54done having young children
00:56the Marvin's refused to sign
00:59dcf's lgbtqia plus nondiscrimination
01:02policy, which states a foster
01:04family must accept a child's
01:06assertion of their lgbtqia plus
01:09identity, address children by
01:11their names and pronouns and
01:13support gender neutral practices
01:15regarding clothes and physical
01:16appearance. We had asked is
01:19there any sort of accommodation?
01:20Can you waive this at all?
01:22We will absolutely love and
01:23support and care for any child
01:25in our home, but we simply
01:26can't agree to go against our
01:28christian faith in this area.
01:31Um, and we're ultimately told
01:32no, you must sign the form as
01:34is or else you will be
01:36de licensed.
01:37The marvins are still
01:38considering their options,
01:39but two other massachusetts
01:40christian foster families
01:42filed a federal lawsuit
01:43against dcf in september,
01:45represented by the massachusetts
01:46family institute and national
01:48group alliance defending freedom.
01:50So there's a speech component
01:51and also a religious liberty
01:53component to the lawsuit.
01:55Just last week, the trump
01:57administration sent mass dcf a
01:58letter. It mentions the marvins
01:59directly and says, quote, these
02:01policies and developments are
02:02deeply troubling, clearly
02:04contrary to the purpose of
02:05child welfare programs and in
02:07direct violation of first
02:09amendment protections.
Comments