Skip to player
Skip to main content
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Bookmark
Share
More
Add to Playlist
Report
China’s building 1,700 ships to America’s 5. Senators say it’s a security issue
Straight Arrow News
Follow
1 day ago
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Once upon a time, America dominated commercial shipbuilding, but no more.
00:04
Today, China, Japan, and South Korea reign supreme.
00:08
Senators Todd Young and Mark Kelly are on a mission to reinvigorate an industry
00:12
that sank in the United States generations ago and never recovered.
00:16
This is a national security bill.
00:18
The stakes are high.
00:22
So the senators introduced the Ships for America Act,
00:25
which seeks to not just galvanize commercial shipbuilding,
00:28
but ensure the United States has the highly trained professionals needed to build and operate these vessels.
00:34
You will not have a cost-effective and on-time naval shipbuilding enterprise
00:39
if you do not have a strong commercial shipbuilding enterprise.
00:43
So can these senators get their bills signed into law
00:46
and bring American shipbuilding back to its former glory in just a few years?
00:50
We can't fail.
00:54
American shipyards, the envy of the world.
00:56
Oh, wait, sorry. This is video from China, and they are crushing the United States.
01:01
The Chinese build 1,700 ships per year.
01:05
China, along with Japan and South Korea, dominate the industry,
01:08
with 90% of all new ocean-going vessels.
01:11
I need one hand to count how many ocean-going vessels the United States builds annually.
01:16
Five.
01:17
That's right, five.
01:18
How did we get to this depleted state?
01:20
Well, we took our eye off the ball.
01:23
Other countries had prioritized shipbuilding for domestic political reasons,
01:28
but more importantly, for national security reasons.
01:31
They rightly understood that shipbuilding has national security spillover implications,
01:38
and it's really important for a country to have shipbuilding capacity.
01:43
Here's a timeline of America's shipbuilding decline.
01:45
America truly was the envy of the world after World War II.
01:49
The United States had more than 4,400 flagships of all types and sizes capable of carrying 57% of U.S. trade.
01:58
The government sold many of those surplus vessels to shipping companies at great prices.
02:02
That, combined with the United States' higher labor costs,
02:06
dried up demand for new American ships, and the yards closed.
02:09
By the 1970s, the United States was only building 15 to 25 new commercial ships per year.
02:15
That dropped to five by the 80s, and it's where we remain today.
02:19
There are only six shipyards in the United States building large commercial vessels.
02:24
That includes Philly Shipyard, owned by Hanwha.
02:27
The South Korea-based company supports the Ships for America Act
02:30
and its stated goal of unlocking investment to build new shipyards
02:34
and revive some of the 60 shipyards that have fallen out of service.
02:38
What's it take to get a new shipyard up and running or bring one back into commission?
02:42
It's a lot, but for frame of reference in World War II, and obviously that's a challenging time,
02:48
we stood up six emergency shipyards in six months.
02:50
So we can do it.
02:52
It's a doable feat.
02:54
Is shipbuilding more complicated than it was then?
02:56
Yes.
02:56
Are ships more complicated?
02:58
Yes.
02:59
But if you have the funding available, it's possible.
03:04
But that is where you run into challenges.
03:06
In the United States, a private shipyard has not been stood up
03:10
without significant government assistance since the 19th century.
03:14
So if we are standing up new shipyards in the United States,
03:17
it's going to have to involve U.S. government support.
03:20
Due to low demand, Philly Shipyard currently builds 1.2 ships per year.
03:24
In an industry with tight margins, scaling up can have compounding effects.
03:28
I'll make it simple math.
03:30
If at Philadelphia you build 1.2 ships a year, any CapEx investment you make,
03:35
your labor costs, they're spread off 1.2 ships a year.
03:39
In Korea, we build anywhere from 35 to 50 ships a year.
03:42
Now my CapEx investment is amortized out across those number of ships, the profit.
03:48
My labor costs, which are not linear, are now spread out over 40 ships instead of 1.2.
03:54
And it's not like 40 ships takes 40 times the labor of one ship.
03:58
You're benefiting significantly.
04:00
Here's how the Ships for America Act would help with that.
04:02
It would create a maritime security trust fund,
04:05
very similar to the highway and aviation trust funds.
04:08
That money would be used to help shipyards and shipbuilding.
04:11
It would create a program to establish a fleet of 250 U.S. flagged vessels in international commerce,
04:17
establish tax and import duty incentives for shipping goods into the U.S. on American ships.
04:22
It would also create incentives for Americans to make a career as a mariner,
04:26
like public service loan forgiveness.
04:28
The 310-page bill is a comprehensive overhaul of the American maritime industry.
04:34
All right, so we're out here in the Chesapeake Bay,
04:36
where there's about a half a dozen ships waiting their turn to get into the port of Baltimore.
04:40
So this is probably a good time to explain what exactly is an ocean-going vessel.
04:44
Well, to put it simply, it's a large ship that's capable of crossing the open ocean.
04:48
They include container ships, bulk carriers, general cargo ships, passenger ships, oil tankers,
04:56
and roll-on-roll-off vehicle carriers like the Lake Victoria.
04:59
The objective is to not only train a bunch of people,
05:02
but to build 250 ocean-going vessels in the next 10 years, which is pretty ambitious.
05:08
In the very beginning of this video, Senator Young called this a national security bill.
05:13
Here's a bit more context.
05:14
It's also a bill about economic security and economic opportunity
05:18
and making sure that we're independent of other countries for, you know, essential services like shipping.
05:28
But more than anything else, this is a national security bill.
05:32
So why do commercial ocean-going vessels matter to national security, specifically the military?
05:38
A couple reasons.
05:39
For starters, if the United States ever went to war, there would be what's called a sea lift.
05:43
That's when troops, weapons, vehicles, and supplies are sent to the war zone
05:47
on a combination of military and commercial vessels.
05:51
It's an essential part of war logistics because sea lifts can carry substantially heavier payloads than air lifts.
05:57
In fact, cargo ships could transport 90% of the military equipment needed overseas.
06:02
Right now, we don't have that capacity.
06:05
You can imagine a situation that, a military conflict that lasts for more than a few months.
06:12
If that were to happen, we would not have the capacity under so many scenarios to repair the vessels that need to be repaired
06:22
and to build new vessels.
06:23
That ought to be alarming to every American.
06:26
Another reason, cost and efficiency.
06:29
Let's say I make a widget, I'm a member of the supply chain, goes into the naval ship.
06:34
If that widget only goes into a naval ship, the amount of premium the U.S. government has to pay
06:39
to keep me in business to exclusively supply that widget for the naval ship is much higher
06:45
than if my widget goes into the naval ship and goes into these three classes of commercial ship
06:49
and I have other lines of business that allow me then to price my product appropriately to the Navy
06:55
because they're not the sole reason I exist.
06:58
Anytime the government is the sole reason a supply chain member or even a prime,
07:04
such as the shipbuilder themselves, exists, the U.S. government pays a premium.
07:08
All right, so the sun is setting and it's time to head back to Doc's.
07:11
So we'll leave you with this.
07:13
If this bill were signed into law tomorrow,
07:15
it would take years for United States shipbuilding to get to where these senators want it to be
07:20
and it would also take an investment from the government of hundreds of millions of dollars.
07:25
So this is going to be a long-term national commitment.
07:30
I'm Ray Bogan for Straight Hour News.
07:32
For more unbiased reporting straight from the Chesapeake Bay, download the SAN app.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Recommended
3:38
|
Up next
Reloading at sea: US Navy’s answer to China’s missile advantage
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:48
Video shows Chinese ships colliding in South China Sea
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:43
China to unveil hypersonic missile capable of striking US carriers
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
2:29
Trump says tariffs on China are an emergency, but what makes it one?
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
3:19
Cruz, lawmakers warn of China surpassing US in space race
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
3:15
US Navy turns to South Korea to keep ships ready for the Pacific
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:32
Beijing claims it ‘drove away’ US destroyer in South China Sea
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
2:45
Healing or influence? China sends naval ship to Caribbean
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
5:12
A war without war: China’s gray zone activity
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:44
Trump Says He Will Be Going to China
Bloomberg
6 days ago
9:35
Trump hails ‘amazing’ Xi summit, floats nuke testing; Melissa devastates region | Unbiased Updates
Straight Arrow News
3 days ago
10:04
Hurricane Melissa batters Cuba; Air traffic controllers warn of safety crisis | Unbiased Updates
Straight Arrow News
4 days ago
1:45
China working to double nuclear warheads: Pentagon
Al Jazeera English
5 years ago
1:59
Trump drafts executive order targeting China’s experimental drug dominance
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:45
Vietnam accelerates land building in disputed South China Sea
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
3:35
Japan building railgun-armed destroyers with help from the US
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:57
China’s first mall designed solely for robots to host global sports event
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
2:24
China Has Too Much Leverage Over US, Says Anduril's Luckey
Bloomberg
6 days ago
1:32
NASA blocks Chinese nationals from agency facilities
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
9:15
China’s military parade: Some cause for concern, but mostly show
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
2:34
China’s parade of power draws Putin, Kim and Trump’s ire
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:18
At 2,000 feet, world’s highest bridge opens in China
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
1:49
Trump, China's Xi Set to Meet in South Korea
Bloomberg
4 days ago
1:06
Chinese exports to US plunge as Trump tariffs bite
Straight Arrow News
6 days ago
59:18
Can Jon Jones vs Alex Pereira SAVE the UFC's Heavyweight Division? | Against the Cage
New York Post
2 days ago
Be the first to comment