Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 months ago
Terry Irving spent 1,671 days in prison, more than four and a half years, until his conviction on robbery charges was overturned. Earlier this month, the supreme court of Queensland awarded the 70-year-old Indigenous man over 100,000 dollars in damages for malicious prosecution, equivalent to just eight days of his incarceration.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00Back in March 1993, there was a bank robbery in Cairns, in North Queensland, and Terry
00:09Irving was at the pub and he saw an acquaintance who asked him if he could borrow his car,
00:17and it was returned to him later that afternoon.
00:20And it's clear that that car was used in the bank robbery.
00:25So shortly thereafter, Terry was charged with being an accessory to the crime for providing
00:29his car to the bank robber, and he was taken into custody.
00:34But then after about eight days, Terry was actually charged with the bank robbery itself.
00:40And the charge of being an accessory to the crime was dropped.
00:44Now Terry went on to be found guilty of the bank robbery, and he was sentenced to eight
00:49years in jail.
00:51But after four years, the High Court of Australia quashed that conviction and he was released.
00:56So Chief Justice of the High Court at the time, Brennan said he had, quote, the gravest misgivings
01:02about the circumstances of the case, and that it was, quote, a very disturbing situation.
01:08So clearly, and even the prosecution by the time it got to the High Court agreed that both
01:12the trial and the investigation had been very unfair to Terry Irving.
01:18So more than 30 years later, why did the Supreme Court of Queensland award Terry Irving $130,000
01:25in damages for malicious prosecution?
01:28And what period of detention does that compensation cover?
01:31Well, Ros, the malicious prosecution relates to that earlier dropped charge of being an accessory
01:40to the crime.
01:41And the courts in Queensland had found that the police officer, Helen Mary Finkst, never
01:48at any point had a genuine belief that he was an accessory to the crime.
01:54The court found that she used this accessory charge strategically.
02:01What she wanted to do was to use it to get him into custody and then use it the time while
02:07he was in custody to build a case against him for the actual robbery.
02:12He was awarded $130,000 for the eight days he stayed in custody before he was actually charged
02:21with the robbery.
02:22The courts have separately found that the actual robbery charge was, while flawed, not brought
02:31to the very highest bar of being a malicious prosecution.
02:35So he can't get any compensation for the subsequent four years he stayed in jail, even though he would
02:42argue that the flaws in both charges are intimately connected and totally intertwined.
02:48So instead, his only option is to ask the government of Queensland for what's known as an ex-gratia
02:55payment for the miscarriage of justice that he experienced.
02:59And he's repeatedly asked for that over the last 30 years and he's been repeatedly denied
03:06that kind of ex-gratia payment by the Queensland government.
03:09And what is the process for obtaining ex-gratia compensation after a miscarriage of justice of
03:14this kind, Damien?
03:16Well, Ros, it's totally in the hands of the state or territory attorney general.
03:22They can receive the request and they can grant it or not grant it, and they don't have to
03:27give any reasons why.
03:29So we really don't know why he has been denied an ex-gratia payment this last 30 years.
03:35His lawyers say the malicious prosecution, the way he was charged with being an accessory to
03:41the bank robbery, that is deeply intertwined, inextricably linked to the subsequent armed
03:50robbery trial.
03:51And all the flaws in the investigation and in the trial, they can't be separated out.
03:58So he should be entitled to an ex-gratia payment because there was a profound miscarriage of justice.
04:05And they're now saying, look, now that we have this finding by the court of a malicious prosecution,
04:13the Queensland government should go back and revisit its decision not to give him an ex-gratia
04:19payment.
04:20More on the Law Report at 5.30pm on RN Eastern tonight or anytime on ABC Listen app.
04:25Damon, thank you.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended