Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6 weeks ago
Transcript
00:00West African Examination Council has officially revised the 2025 SSE result
00:06after discovering grading errors linked to a new paper serialization system.
00:12Joining us to unpack all of this, what happened, the implications for students,
00:16and the lessons for the future is Mr. Alex Onyea, CEO, Educare.
00:21I am Timitayo Olumofey. Welcome to Guardian Talks.
00:30How significant is why it's admission of a grading error in 2025 SSE?
00:39And what does it mean for credibility of national examinations?
00:45Okay, several hundreds of thousands of students were actually affected.
00:50And the key subjects that I remember was English, maths, physics, chemistry, and economics.
00:56So these are like the key subjects that were affected.
01:00So right now, it's a huge dent on their credibility, and they have to fix it for this kind of thing to happen.
01:07So they need to probably find the point.
01:09But I think my wife is going to CBT next year.
01:12So that can also be a good way to correct such.
01:15The CBT thing, you know, moving from the handwritten examination and then taking it a step further to CBT,
01:26do you think it's going to be very easier for students outside Lagos, especially in the north,
01:33for people that might not be accustomed to such development?
01:36Those people, they write jam, right?
01:42If they can write jam, I think they should also be able to write one.
01:47So I don't see it as so much.
01:49If they organize it a lot better, I don't think it's so much of a big challenge.
01:53Oh, okay.
01:54So there's really an infrastructure in place for that, yes.
01:57Okay.
01:58For clarity, could you break down the paper serialization, means, and why I adopted it?
02:05So I think what they did was they had, like, four paper types.
02:14So four paper types probably had different codes.
02:17They have four paper types.
02:18So maybe I am writing paper 0048.
02:21Okay.
02:22I think they have four paper types, yes.
02:24Okay.
02:25So maybe I'm writing paper 0048.
02:29You are writing paper 0049.
02:32The next person is writing 0051.
02:35And the other person is writing.
02:37So maybe the four people sitting together or the eight persons probably are going to be
02:43writing different papers.
02:45So that makes it a lot difficult for exam malpractice to happen.
02:50Right?
02:51Yeah.
02:52Because if you give everybody the same exam, it's very easy.
02:56I can be at one age and I'm already giving you signs of different answers and the rest.
03:03So that's basically what they did to see how they can call malpractice.
03:07But I don't even know if that was actually where the issue erupted from.
03:10Came from.
03:11Right.
03:12Now, the counsel mentioned that English language objective paper was caught with incorrect keys.
03:20How could such an error slip through their quality check?
03:23The point is, what is the quality of their quality check?
03:31So if the quality of their quality check determines where these errors can actually happen.
03:37If the quality of their quality check is really poor, then of course they can even have more
03:41errors that they probably have to still cover up as well.
03:44Well, now let's look beyond English.
03:50Subjects like mathematics, biology, and economics were also serialized.
03:56Should students be worried about similar mistakes in those subjects?
04:02Yes.
04:03The corrections actually affected all the subjects.
04:06Now, from your, from your, you want, you're saying something, sir?
04:16No, I said it did.
04:18I'm done basically affirming that it did.
04:20Okay.
04:20Okay.
04:21So from your perspective, what immediate steps should WIED take to restore public trust after
04:27this incident?
04:27The thing is, this kind of incident should never have happened again.
04:35I mean, you guys are your exam bodies, right?
04:38Yeah.
04:38You write your exams.
04:40You have, you probably take a year to prepare for this exam.
04:44You have a lot of time to do your vetting and nobody pushes you to publish.
04:49So you have to also improve on your quality control checks and probably have independent auditors
04:54too to participate.
04:55So at the end of every of your assessment, you'll have your two, three, four layers of
05:00quality checks.
05:02Probably an independent auditor also enjoys one of the layers.
05:06Then before you go public.
05:08So they have to ensure that it should never happen again.
05:14Hopefully.
05:15Looking ahead, how can technology, when implemented correctly, improve examination security without
05:22risking such large-scale grading errors?
05:25Yeah.
05:28You know, it's just like every exam.
05:32Once your technology is done right, and you have different layers of check, you've already
05:39eliminated above 80% of the issues that you will ever have.
05:43Yeah.
05:44Right?
05:45Whether it's the idea of malpractice, is it of missing stars, or is it of missing images?
05:49There are so many issues that will arise.
05:51If you don't use the technology, we're here to eliminate them.
05:55Right?
05:55Yeah.
05:56So it's when you achieve that, then everything you do will work.
06:00Well, thank you.
06:04Thank you, Mr. Alex Onya, CEO, Educare.
06:07I mean, we are hopeful that something as huge like this, an error like this will not repeat
06:15itself next year.
06:17I mean, like you said, they have one year to prepare, and there is no excuse if something
06:23like this slips through YAC's quality checks.
06:26Thank you for your time with us, sir.
06:29You're welcome.
06:30Thank you so much.
06:31So have a great day.
06:34Thank you, Edu.
06:34Thank you, Mr. Onya, for sharing your insight with us.
06:37This YAC 2025 revision has shown us that innovation must go hand-in-hand with accuracy.
06:44I am Timitai Olumafey, and this has been Guardian Talks.
06:48Have a great time.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended