Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 months ago
Peter Kyle has refused to apologise to the leader of Reform UK and doubled down on his comments, saying “Nigel Farage is on the side of predators and paedophiles and needs to be called out for it.” It comes as the leader of Reform UK called on Mr Kyle to apologise for the “disgusting” comments. Report by Gluszczykm. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/itn and follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/itn

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00If you are against those measures, if you are against the Online Safety Act and want
00:05to overturn it, you are on the side of predators and paedophiles because you will allow them
00:11to have the kind of access they had in the past but they cannot have now.
00:15Nigel Farage is therefore on the side of predators and paedophiles and he needs to be called
00:19out for it.
00:20It is quite clear, if you want to overturn the laws which prevent the grooming of children,
00:27you are on the side of the people who want to do the grooming.
00:30Nigel Farage has said he wants to overturn the act entirely, including all of the safety
00:35measures for children.
00:36He needs to accept that the consequences of what he wants to do will be to make it far
00:41easier for predators and for paedophiles to have access to children online.
00:46Easier not harder.
00:47It puts him on that side of the argument.
00:49He needs to explain himself.
00:51I certainly won't be apologising to the man who wants to overturn the laws that keep our
00:56children safe online.
00:58We have to move forward as a country.
01:01Of course, because of the online world and the environment we live in, then it means that
01:04more crime is happening online than in previous years.
01:08This Labour government has brought in measures in law that prevent paedophiles and predators
01:13from having access to children online.
01:15Nigel Farage wants to overturn those laws.
01:18He needs to explain why he wants to expose children to the kind of Wild West world that we had before
01:24this law.
Comments

Recommended