00:00SEBI seems to have acted based on some investigation
00:04because otherwise they would not have taken such a strong step
00:09of banning them from doing any work on the stock exchanges
00:13or freezing their bank account.
00:16So unless there's specific proof,
00:18they would not have passed this interim order.
00:21Now the view is that the interim order is premature.
00:24They should have waited.
00:25That's something based on facts.
00:28We have to consider what the facts are.
00:30If the facts show that there has been some manipulation
00:34and that is clear beyond doubt,
00:37then an interim order would be justified.
00:40So now the option before the company is
00:47to go in appeal to the appellate tribunal.
00:50I'm sure the appellate tribunal will go into all the facts
00:54and the company Jane Street will be able to bring all the facts on record.
01:00Adequate opportunity will be given to them.
01:03If necessary, SEBI appellate tribunal may order a forensic audit
01:07to go into the transactions and the books of account.
01:11And thereafter, the appellate tribunal will pass an order.
01:13If SEBI has erred in passing this interim order,
01:18then it will be set aside
01:19and the company would be able to function as before.
01:23Otherwise, it may be upheld.
01:25If it is upheld, then again,
01:27they can go and appeal to the Supreme Court
01:29and the Supreme Court may decide
01:31whether there is any error in the order of SEBI.
01:34So as I see, it all depends on the facts of the case.
01:40The facts have to be very clear.
01:42This is not an issue of law.
01:43This is an issue of facts.
01:45If there is a factual evidence of manipulation
01:47as cleaned by SEBI,
01:49then this order will stand in a court of law.
01:52Otherwise, it will be overruled.
01:54This is not an issue of facts.
Comments