00:00Mr. Crane for five minutes. Thank you, Ms. Chairwoman. Thank you guys for coming today.
00:05I want to start with you, Dr. Curtis. As a dental surgeon who was present in the hospital room the
00:12day President Kennedy was shot, you were able to observe his wounds and maybe some of his
00:17medical records. Is that correct? Can you not hear me, Dr. Curtis? So you were there in the
00:31emergency room the day that the President was brought in? Yes. How old were you, sir? How old
00:37was I? Yeah. 26. 26. And what did you observe when they brought the President in? The President
00:46was already in the room before I arrived. And what I observed about him that he had probably
00:53already deceased. Since you were a dental surgeon, why did they bring you into the operation room?
01:02That's one thing Arlen Spector asked me. What is a dentist doing operating on the President?
01:10Then I had to qualify myself. The training that I have would encompass those particular procedures.
01:22And that's a simple procedure. And I did it well. And I just knew how to do it. There was nobody else
01:30there to do it. And I did it. Because Dr. Kerko asked me to do it.
01:40Can you tell us about the wounds that you observed on the President and how they differ from what came
01:46out in some of the reporting? The wounds on the President were to his throat
01:51and to his head and to his back. The wound to his throat would have killed him. The wound to his head
02:01definitely would have killed him. The wound to his back would not have killed him.
02:06Did the wounds to his throat and his head look like completely separate wounds?
02:10There were two separate wounds. Let me show it to you. The blue wound was sent from the railroad
02:23trestle all the way over to kill him right here. And that went to his throat. And the way that killed
02:29him is that it obstructed the trachea and he couldn't breathe. So he would have been dead before
02:38he reached the hospital just simply because of that wound. The other wound that he had to his head
02:45would have killed him instantly because it removed about a third of his brain.
02:50Thank you. Mr. Hardway, I want to move to you next. You talked about the obstruction of a federal
02:59investigation that you yourself witnessed. You were on the House Select Committee for assassination.
03:06Is that correct? Yes, sir. What year would that have been? 1977-1978. The obstruction occurred
03:12entirely in 1978. What was your role in that investigation? My role was a researcher with
03:19primary responsibility for researching Lee Harvey Oswald's activities in Mexico City and the CIA
03:26response to that. We've heard about some of the administrative roadblocks that the CIA put up for
03:33you. Did you have any direct verbal communication with anybody at the CIA? Oh, yeah. Frequently.
03:41Can you tell us about some of those conversation and how it might have been conceived as obstruction?
03:49Well, when we first started, we had unlimited, unexpurgated access. We had two clerks assigned to us.
03:57We had our office at the CIA. Pretty much went to work out there every morning. We'd ask for a file.
04:03They would go get it. We would review it. It was unredacted and given to us in its original state.
04:13After they brought George Joannidis in, he began slowly tightening down the process. We were no longer
04:19working with two clerks who went and got our files. We had to file formally requests through him to get
04:27the files and we started experiencing significant delays in the files that we would get.
04:35We started noticing that the files we would get would have obvious things missing from them.
04:41Then he went so far as to actually start putting parts of the files in envelopes and leaving them
04:47in the files so that what we would get is we would sign that we'd seen the files, but we weren't allowed
04:53to open the stuff that he had placed in envelopes. That came back to Hannah's later in dealing with the
04:59final report and some of the things we were trying to get out of them when they would tell
05:03the chairman of the committee. He's seen that. Here's where he signed for the file. I would have
05:09to explain to Chairman Stokes that no, that was not in the file when I saw it because that was what I
05:16was looking for and it was not there. It must have been in one of the envelopes. He eventually just shut
05:23us down. It culminated on one file that I really wanted to see. When it was presented to me, Mr.
05:30Joe Aniti showed up himself to give it to me. He was actually bouncing on his toes. Him and Scott
05:36Breckinridge brought the file to me at the CIA, called me back out there to see it. It had not
05:42just been redacted, it had been retyped with the redactions in white space as it had been retyped. It
05:48was a report on a debriefing of a certain person. I exploded. I acted like a very angry 24-year-old
05:58and had choice words for both of them and stormed out of the office and went back to the headquarters.
06:07I subsequently, thanks to Judge Tunheim's work, saw the memorandum to the record that Mr. Breckinridge
06:15wrote and the memorandum for the record says that the file was shown to me and, quote,
06:23no objections were recorded, close quote. Notice the way, you have to watch what the CIA says.
06:32He didn't say that I didn't make any, which is what everyone infers from what he said. What he said
06:38was none were recorded and that's because he made the record. Thank you. I yield back.
06:44Thank you, Madam Chair, and thank you for your leadership on this committee.
Comments