00:00 the Supreme Court. But can you now make the Supreme Court or Islamabad High Court's judgment the base and issue an application to end Mr. Jadun's conviction because the reference has also ended?
00:11 No, the reference will end but the conviction will end. So, in the Basit 1F, they have put it in the section of the Election Act 2017. They have changed it and added it.
00:26 So, in that case, it is possible that the question will go to the Supreme Court again.
00:30 But the Supreme Court's judgment is also in its place. You will have to retrack that judgment because you cannot overshadow a judgment through a simple act.
00:38 No, see this is the question. The opinion of one set of people is that if a person submits the paper, then he should take up the objection and finally settle the Supreme Court.
00:49 But now the Supreme Court, you know, the judgment given in the Practice and Proceed Act, in that light, I would say that the Supreme Court will endorse the law that the Parliament has made.
00:59 Now, because this was a different opinion, they said that the appeal of 184(3) cannot be done through the Act. A constitutional amendment will have to be made in this.
01:07 So, the Supreme Court has held that no, the Parliament is supreme, they have admitted the sovereignty of the Parliament.
01:14 So, if this case goes again, it is possible that the Supreme Court will say on this analogy that if the Parliament has made this law.
01:20 Isn't that what you are seeing?
01:21 Yes, yes.
01:22 That Act is in the context of the Practice and Procedure. Here, a judgment of the Supreme Court is also in place.
01:29 It is present, which is explaining.
01:30 And that is explaining a provision of the Act.
01:32 Of Article 62.
01:33 If it is explaining the provision of the Act and while explaining it says, if you say this, then you will make the Act a 'Bazicha Etwahal'.
01:40 You will make the explanation of the Act a Supreme Court.
01:44 And through the Act, you will make a law.
01:45 Without making the explanation of the Act, you will make a simple Act of Parliament.
01:47 With the help of the law.
01:48 This means that if this argument is accepted, then in the future, the explanation of the Act in Pakistan will not be done by the Supreme Court, but will be done through an Act of Parliament.
02:00 So, what is the next step to end your inability?
02:03 There is only one. There are two basic steps. Either the judgment of the Supreme Court should be reversed, which was not qualified.
02:10 In this case, the Supreme Court should take the finality and in some other case, say that the view that we had taken earlier was very wrong and we will reverse it.
02:18 This judgment will not be a valid law.
02:19 And the second step?
02:20 The second step is to amend the Ayan. There is no Assembly. So, the amendment to the Ayan is not possible now.
02:26 But apart from this, I do not see any third option on this.
02:29 What will you say about the Al Aziziyah case, Mr. Jadoom?
02:33 Because today, it was also going to be heard, but now it will be decided for the next hearing.
02:40 Will you see such a speedy relief in Al Aziziyah case?
02:43 No, Al Aziziyah case, you see, the judge, may Allah give him heaven, may Allah give him heaven.
02:49 He said that he was under so much pressure.
02:51 Once he returned the flagship reference.
02:54 He gave a cuttle in it.
02:56 He said that he was under so much pressure.
02:59 His video recording shows that the case has been ruined so much.
03:02 The pressure was so high.
03:03 What did he do?
03:04 You can read the statement of Shaukat Siddiqi on the evidence.
03:07 He said that he was also under so much pressure that he brought the bench to this side and gave justice.
03:10 So, all these things, you see, beyond reasonable doubt, you have to give a person a punishment.
03:15 You have to convict him.
03:16 You have to give him a liberty.
03:18 You have to keep him in prison.
03:19 So, you should prove the prosecution to be beyond reasonable doubt.
03:22 The prosecution benefits the defense.
03:28 And the benefit of the prosecution will be for the accused and the defense.
03:33 So, I don't see any punishment being maintained in that.
03:35 The same stance was there in NAAP.
03:39 The court has also seen the whole case.
03:41 I think that in that case, next week or whenever it is applied, it will also be cuttled.
03:45 And it is expected that next week it will also be cuttled.
03:48 It can be next week.
03:49 The court has also said that we know why you have done it.
03:57 So, it is not over yet.
03:58 Supreme Court has said that NAAP is buried.
04:01 It should be released now.
04:03 These IROs and the drama that we are seeing with the country.
04:06 How were the apartments acquired by Nazeen Evanfield?
04:09 What was the money trail?
04:10 We do not know that still.
04:12 But it was run in such a crazy way.
04:14 And the demand turned out to be so weak that within days you are seeing
04:18 that these are on merit acquittals.
04:20 The former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, about 78 times.
04:23 Mariam Sahiba, about 80 times.
04:25 And Captain Sabdar, 92 times he was presented in the court.
04:28 And Mian Sahab, in the trial court, he spent about 400 hours.
04:33 And his daughter Mariam Nawaz spent almost the same time in the same court.
04:37 The interesting thing is that these five accused were not presented in the Panama Papers case.
04:43 Whereas Sheikh Rashid, Tariq Insaaf, Imran Khan, Jamaat-e-Islami were all present.
04:48 They were all very much in that courtroom.
04:50 Throughout 18 witnesses' statements were closed.
04:53 10 volumes of evidence were told.
04:57 Where the lawyer of the Sharif family, Khwaja Haris and Amjad Parvez were presented in the trial court.
05:01 And the head of the joint investigation team, Wajid Zia.
05:03 And in Britain, the forensic expert, Robert Redley, was also given an important role in terms of witnesses.
Be the first to comment