00:00 I told you about the debate and you also agreed with me.
00:06 How will this case go to the Supreme Court?
00:08 First tell me who should go to the Supreme Court?
00:10 Will there be a petition?
00:12 Will the President write a letter?
00:14 How will it happen that this case will be settled?
00:16 Do you think that this will remain a part of the TV's narrative till tonight?
00:24 Look, Ghashif, this law has been published in the Gazette.
00:30 In fact, two laws were published on 18th.
00:34 When a law is published in the Gazette, it is a part of the Pakistan Statute Book.
00:41 Both these laws are now a part of the law.
00:45 And all relevant institutions can enforce these laws.
00:51 So, until these laws are not declared illegal,
00:55 and only the Supreme Court can declare them illegal,
00:58 these laws will remain in the book.
01:02 Although, in my opinion, these laws are made in a wrong way,
01:06 and in the eyes of the law, the law should not be understood,
01:10 but the situation is that it has come to the Gazette.
01:13 But, Mr. Wada, the President of Pakistan himself thinks that this law has been made.
01:19 God knows everything. God will forgive him.
01:22 But I apologize to those who have been affected by this.
01:25 So, he thinks it's a law.
01:27 I am explaining that when something is notified in the Gazette,
01:32 it is considered a law.
01:34 Until the court declares that this law is illegal,
01:39 we call it illegal.
01:41 So, as long as it is in the Gazette, it is a law.
01:45 That is why the President of the country said that if anyone is harmed because of this,
01:49 and this happened because of my lack of action,
01:52 that the situation came to the point that it was notified in the Gazette,
01:55 that is why he apologized.
01:57 But the legal and legal situation is different.
02:01 From that point of view, if we look at it,
02:03 then coming to the Gazette is an illegal act,
02:06 and a court will have to decide that this was an illegal, illegal act.
02:11 But Mr. Iran, the problem is that Jaiyad and our Bokla are divided.
02:15 I am speaking.
02:17 There are some people about whom you know that their view will be according to their political leanings.
02:22 But here those people are on both sides,
02:25 who give a largely fair view about their things.
02:29 So, there is a view on both sides.
02:32 Secondly, is it necessary to give this order in writing to the President
02:36 that he should be sent back or verbal orders should be issued?
02:40 I will tell you what the situation is here.
02:43 Look, we are going through two or three cases.
02:47 The first case is that did he give an assent?
02:51 Look, the requirement of the law is that a bill will be made at the time when it will get the President's assent,
02:57 that is, the President's assent that I am in agreement with it.
03:01 Now, being in agreement with something is a clear act.
03:05 Whether I sign it and express my agreement or do it in some other way,
03:11 there is a clear act in it through which it is said that I am in agreement.
03:16 Now, the first requirement of the law is that the President should express his agreement, his assent.
03:25 Now everyone is accepting this.
03:27 For a few hours yesterday, it was assumed that perhaps fake signatures were made.
03:30 Now it has become clear that these bills were not signed.
03:34 When the signatures were not made, then where did the assent come from?
03:37 Where did the approval come from?
03:39 If we also believe that the President is guilty, his attacker is not guilty,
03:45 then is it not appropriate to send him back with the message that he was not sent back in 10 days?
03:51 But Mr. Rai, I have started reading from the bill again.
03:54 I am being told to take a break. I will answer it after the break.
03:57 But these are completely different incidents.
03:59 Sir, listen to me.
04:00 Two conditions have been given in the bill.
04:03 One, to sign the bill, that is, to express his consent.
04:07 Second, the bill, apart from the money bill, should be sent back to the Parliament with a message
04:16 requesting that the bill or any specified provision thereof be reconsidered.
04:21 It is a must to give a message for it.
04:24 Now the problem is that these two conditions have not been fulfilled.
04:26 Now it is open to interpretation.
Comments