Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 years ago
The University of the Philippines has drafted guidelines on the 'responsible' use of Artificial Intelligence amid the technology's rapid advancement.

UP AI Program assistant professor Miguel Francisco Remolona joins us via Zoom.

Visit our website for more #NewsYouCanTrust: https://www.cnnphilippines.com/

Follow our social media pages:

• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CNNPhilippines
• Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cnnphilippines/
• Twitter: https://twitter.com/cnnphilippines

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 The University of the Philippines has drafted guidelines on the responsible use of artificial
00:04 intelligence amid the technology's rapid advancement.
00:08 UPAI Program Assistant Professor Miguel Francisco Ramolona joins us now via Zoom.
00:14 Professor, thank you so much for joining us.
00:16 You've read this draft of guiding principles on the responsible use of artificial intelligence.
00:23 What do you think of this draft so far?
00:28 So far, we think that there's potential in the draft.
00:33 There's a lot of topics there that are already covered, especially with regards to the ethics
00:39 of the use of artificial intelligence.
00:42 But we do not want this policy or this draft of this policy to be a basis for hindering
00:51 the development of AI.
00:53 So what we want is to have a more democratic approach in drafting these policies.
01:00 That's why these policies were revealed to the public before being finalized.
01:06 Because of the responses and because of the perception of people, especially with regards
01:16 to the negative sides of AI, we also wanted to make sure that this doesn't send the wrong
01:22 message to everyone, that we still want to develop and still use AI, that we are not
01:29 actually limiting its use, but we're just looking at what are the possible repercussions
01:34 and what are the possible ethical situations.
01:39 So for now, Professor, the principles in this draft do not include specific policies on
01:47 the dos and the don'ts in the use of AI.
01:51 What's with it?
01:52 Well, for now, I think it's better to have what is known as a soft regulation when it
01:59 comes to these types of emerging technologies.
02:04 Because if we put in hard regulations, then we're limiting ourselves and we might be actually
02:10 hurting instead of helping both our students and our teachers.
02:15 This tool might be helpful in terms of expanding the range of what is currently easily in reach
02:23 of the students, like trying to access newer information might be harder, even though with
02:29 the existence of Google and Wikipedia, that's constantly updating.
02:33 When it comes to state of the art, it's harder to find that.
02:37 And ChatGPT might be a gateway that will have them access this information.
02:41 You mentioned ChatGPT, Professor, you mentioned ChatGPT, and many are already worried that
02:47 ChatGPT opens the door for cheating and plagiarism.
02:51 How imperative is it for schools to promote the positive use and mitigate the negatives
02:57 of AI?
02:59 So right now, in terms of plagiarism and for cheating, for plagiarism, there's actually
03:07 tools right now that help us identify AI writing as opposed to human writing.
03:13 Because AI has a certain style of writing, which combines a lot of, which is essentially
03:19 algorithmic based.
03:22 So sorry, I heard an echo.
03:25 But in any case, so with regards to using this AI writing detection tool, what we use,
03:33 at least in UP Diliman, is Turnitin.
03:35 So Turnitin has an AI detection tool.
03:38 We are currently testing the limits of this AI detection tool, trying to see how far it
03:45 can detect these AI writings, what prompts would be possible, or if I edit the text,
03:52 would it still be able to detect it?
03:55 And so far, at least in our tests so far, we were able to still detect a lot of AI writing,
04:03 even though there's been some minor tweaks in the wording or in the sentence construction,
04:09 but it's still able to detect it as AI writing.
04:12 So if you're worried about that, that's one way to mitigate it.
04:17 So do you think that other universities, professor in the country should also make similar efforts,
04:22 just like what UP Diliman has did?
04:27 I think efforts into trying to identify the perception, especially of faculty and students,
04:33 should be done in the entire country.
04:36 In fact, maybe not just in education, but also in affected industries.
04:41 Just the perception and how they feel that this would impact their lives.
04:45 Would it make it easier?
04:46 Would it make it harder?
04:47 Is it a threat to them?
04:49 Because these sorts of things is what helps in the development of the technology.
04:54 So if we have tools, if we have a more proper understanding of at least the implications
05:01 in terms of our lifestyles, then it's a little bit better to, a little bit easier for us
05:10 to work around the threats, to work around the hazards that are involved.
05:17 Because right now, this is a fast moving technology.
05:20 We can't stop it.
05:22 What we can do is adapt to it in terms of education.
05:25 That's what we're trying to do.
05:26 We're not trying to hinder its growth.
05:28 We're trying to use it.
05:30 We're trying to ensure that it's not abused.
05:34 And that we can identify, or we can just, instead of having essays that are submitted
05:41 or ChatGPT create essays in place of essays that are required, we can ask them to make
05:47 two essays, one that ChatGPT wrote and the other one being a modification of what ChatGPT
05:54 wrote.
05:55 In this case, they're learning in more dimensions than what they can just by reading.
06:00 Okay.
06:01 So, Professor, Professor, I'm sorry, we've run out of time.
06:04 Thank you so much for explaining to us this new draft guidelines.
06:09 And hopefully we will have the final version sooner rather than later.
06:13 UP AI Program Assistant Professor Miguel Francisco Ramolona.

Recommended