Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/2/2023

Visit our website:
http://www.france24.com

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English

Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/France24_en
Transcript
00:00 I'm joined by our international affairs commentator, Doug Herber.
00:02 I like that you added the detail about the house where the mother still lives.
00:06 Well, that's one of those things that just sticks out when you talk about this story.
00:09 Doug, tell us what prompted this hearing in the first place.
00:13 Broadly speaking, and this might come as a shock to some of our listeners,
00:16 the Supreme Court of the United States is the only government agency,
00:19 and it's a branch of government, of course,
00:21 that does not have an enforceable emphasis on enforceable code of conduct,
00:26 code of ethical conduct.
00:28 Shocking, you might say, but as far back as 2019,
00:32 okay, four years ago, not that far back,
00:33 Justice Elena Kagan was before a House committee,
00:36 and she said that the Chief Justice, who was then and now Justice Roberts,
00:40 was studying the question of whether to come up with an enforceable code,
00:45 judicial code that would be applicable to he and his fellow justices.
00:50 It has never happened. It still hasn't happened.
00:52 What has triggered this hearing here and now?
00:54 Why are we standing talking about it today?
00:56 ProPublica, which is an investigative online outlet in the United States,
01:00 recently had a blistering expose,
01:02 basically revealing that Justice Clarence Thomas,
01:06 the one whose mother is living in that house that was sold to the billionaire,
01:09 he, a series of revelations that he had accepted luxury travel,
01:14 very expensive gifts, and done some real estate property deals
01:18 with a property tycoon, and a guy named Harlan Crowe,
01:22 not just any guy that he was accepting gifts and luxury travel from,
01:26 Harlan Crowe is an extremely staunch Republican,
01:29 a very big donor to the Republican Party and Republican political groups,
01:33 to the tune of about $10 million.
01:36 And this is a man that basically flew Clarence Thomas around in his private jet
01:42 to retreats in Northern California,
01:44 a luxury superyacht retreat to an island in Indonesia, so on and so forth.
01:51 And there were also some property deals that I said were struck,
01:53 in which Harlan Crowe purchased some properties from Clarence Thomas' family.
01:59 Now, this comes in a context in which Clarence Thomas' wife
02:04 had already been under heavy criticism and scrutiny
02:07 for allegedly being a prominent player in supporting Donald Trump's efforts
02:11 to overturn the 2020 election.
02:13 So Clarence Thomas fronted center on the radar here
02:16 in the reasons for having this hearing today.
02:19 But he's not the only one, it's the whole Supreme Court.
02:21 Now, as currently composed, as you know,
02:23 Supreme Court is what?
02:24 It's nine justices, six of whom are conservative, three liberal justices.
02:28 And of those six conservative, three are Trump-appointed.
02:31 Another justice, Trump-appointed in this case, Neil Gorsuch,
02:35 also under scrutiny, ethical scrutiny for property deals,
02:40 for selling property shortly after he was confirmed in 2017
02:45 to the head of a law firm that has had business before the Supreme Court.
02:49 You can see the potential, not just the potential,
02:51 you can take away the word potential.
02:53 You could see where the possible conflict of interest arises here.
02:57 That's what this hearing's about.
02:58 The committee, the Senate committee is the judiciary committee.
03:01 It's led by a Democrat named Dick Durbin.
03:03 He's from Illinois, and he basically says
03:06 that it's right now up to Congress to basically help the Supreme Court justices
03:11 protect the, you know, the Congress has to protect the justices
03:14 from themselves actually by having this hearing.
03:16 Who's expected to testify at this hearing today?
03:18 I don't suppose we'll see Clarence Thomas in front of the judiciary committee.
03:21 We will not see Clarence Thomas.
03:23 Certainly not.
03:24 We will also not see, at least not physically see,
03:27 the Chief Justice Roberts, who you could argue would have had a prominent role testifying.
03:32 He did submit a written statement in which he judged
03:36 that the Supreme Court right now did have enforceable practices
03:40 and a code of conduct implying that that was sufficient.
03:44 Dick Durbin, the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, begs to differ,
03:48 saying it's not at all sufficient.
03:49 It's very insufficient.
03:50 He perhaps should have been there.
03:52 There is going to be, before there, two former U.S. District Court judges,
03:56 that is federal judges, former federal judges testifying,
04:00 including a former attorney general under the former president George W. Bush.
04:04 You're going to have a law professor from a private university,
04:09 and you are going to have, I had it somewhere,
04:12 in addition to that, you're going to have the head of ethics from a campaign watchdog group as well.
04:17 So a lot of legal experts as well.
04:19 You've had some other written testimony submitted by a very famous in the U.S.
04:23 progressive law professor emeritus of Harvard University named Lawrence Tribe.
04:28 He submitted written testimony, as has a very prominent conservative former federal judge, Judge Lutig.
04:35 He's also supplied written testimony, heavily in favor of having an ethics code.
04:39 Okay, we'll be looking to see what happens.
04:41 International Affairs Commentary Doug Douglas.
04:43 Thanks as always.

Recommended