Skip to playerSkip to main content
'WE WERE ANTICIPATING EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONIES AND EVIDENCE'

Batangas 2nd District Rep. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro criticized Vice President Sara Duterte’s defense team for presenting what she described as non-explosive testimonies. She said the first six witnesses had not yet addressed the prosecution’s findings on alleged undeclared assets and unexplained wealth totaling P817.87 million.

At a press conference on Friday, Nov. 13, Luistro said the prosecution expected more significant testimonies and evidence from the defense. She also questioned why the defense focused on transactions involving Duterte’s husband, Atty. Manases “Mans” Carpio, such as a restaurant bill in Japan and a shoe purchase in Malaysia. (Video courtesy of the House of Representatives)

READ: https://mb.com.ph/2026/11/13/watusi-level-only-luistro-chides-vp-duterte-defense-team-for-non-explosive-witness-testimonies

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! -
https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00We were anticipating explosive testimonies and or evidence.
00:07But apparently, hindi nga ito kuwitis eh.
00:13Watusi pa yata ito.
00:16So, pagkat they are testifying on the very small portion of what was reported already by the expert witness attorney
00:30Alex Cabrera.
00:31Please take note that in his forensic report, 817 million undeclared property, 817 million unexplained wealth.
00:46We were anticipating the defense to explain this huge amount of undeclared and or unexplained property of the respondent vice
00:57president.
00:58Pero, ang nakita natin, testimony of the city assessor of Davao on a certain property valued at 10 million.
01:14That is per acquisition cost in the Salen.
01:18And the city assessor of Samal on a certain property valued, I believe, at 3 million ba?
01:294 million.
01:30So, assuming without admitting that there are issues on those properties, let us take note of the very big disparity.
01:45Ang hinihintay po natin ay ang paliwanag sa 817 million undeclared and unexplained property.
01:55Pero, ang nasaksihan natin, testimony ng Davao City assessor on one property valued at 10 million per Salen and the
02:05testimony of the Samal City assessor on a property valued at 4 million again based on the Salen.
02:13Tapos, kahapon, nasundan naman ito ng testimony ni Attorney Antero on the bill in one restaurant in Tokyo.
02:28I think that is 200,000 plus.
02:33Sumunod yung testimony ni Mr. Parian on the Nike purchases through credit card also.
02:42I think that's 250,000 more or less.
02:46Isama na din natin yung sa city accountant ng Davao who testified on the declared compensation.
02:55Sabi nila, salary differential in the amount of more or less 80 million.
03:01So, ano ito?
03:0410 million, 4 million, 80,000.
03:1080,000 yung compensation na ipinapaliwanag nila allegedly received in 2023.
03:20Plus, itong Nike and credit card transaction valued or in the amount of more or less 250,000.
03:29So, we understand their intentions to prove the facts behind these figures.
03:39But of course, we anticipated more.
03:42We anticipated more because what the prosecution was able to prove is 817 million.
03:51Undeclared, unexplained property of the respondent Vice President.
03:55Napakalayo ng amount.
03:58Napakalayo ng amount.
04:00And that is why we look forward na ngayong Sabado, bukas, following the 5-day notice rule,
04:11mag-submit ang defense ng names ng witnesses who will be able to testify on more substantial facts
04:21that is completely responsive to the specific allegations in the complaint.
04:29Take note of the specific allegations.
04:311. Failure to declare in the sal-in.
04:362. Unexplained wealth, which means property cannot be supported by legal income.
04:44And 3. Non-divestment of other business and financial interests.
04:50As far as the prosecution is concerned, we have strongly and clearly established these three specific allegations,
04:59which to this date ay hindi pa rin na ipaliwanag ng anim na testigo na iparinisinta ng defense this week.
05:11So, we look forward that come November 19, that is Thursday,
05:18they will be presenting more substantive testimony from competent witnesses.
05:26Competent witnesses, ibig sabihin, may personal knowledge dun sa subject matter ng testimony.
05:34At hindi puros, hindi ko po alam, hindi ko ma-remember, that cannot be.
05:43It is the defense who chooses the witnesses to present.
05:49So, they should be accountable also to make sure that the witnesses who will be placed in the witness stand
05:59are indeed competent, meaning may personal knowledge,
06:04so that pag tinanong sila during cross or tinanong ng senator judges,
06:10they will have the capacity to address all the questions.
06:14So, let us look forward to November 19, hopefully for more substantial testimony, unlike this one.
06:26Kasi kami man, even when we are part of the prosecution panel,
06:33bahagi po kami ng isang bayan ng Pilipino na matagal na rin naghihintay ng kasagutan sa mga aligasyong ito.
06:41So, to be specific, the investigation started in 2024 during the investigation of good government,
06:50then presided by Congressman Joel Chua.
06:54Nasunda ng first impeachment in 2025.
06:57Now, we are on the second impeachment,
06:59and we have been waiting for so long
07:03for the substantial and responsive answer of the respondent vice president
07:10to the specific allegations under Article 2, Unexplained Wealth.
07:15That would be all for the opening statement.
07:17I'm turning over to Congressman Joel Chua.

Recommended