00:00Usually, the pre-nup, usually, all the time that I know as a lawyer,
00:05it should be in-annotate to the marriage certificate.
00:10When it comes to our civil registrar,
00:15when it comes to the final marriage certificate,
00:16it should be pre-nup because it should be noticed to the public
00:19that they have the pre-nupcial agreement
00:22so they don't presume that they have the absolute community property under the family code.
00:27So, katakataka naman, abogado naman sila,
00:29alam naman nila na dapat naka-annotate yan
00:31at public na meron silang pre-nupcial agreement in the office of the civil registrar.
00:36That's number one.
00:37Number two, I will caution anyone.
00:43Sabi ko nga kahit tatak-duterte na nagmamanufacture ng evidence
00:46na nakita ko sa kaso ni Layla Delimay,
00:48huwag naman na sana nilang subukan dito.
00:51I would think katakataka yung existence niyan
00:56kusaka sakaling biglang meron pangalawa.
00:58But pangatlo, so yung credibility niyan,
01:01I think of that piece of evidence will be very, very questionable
01:04tsaka yung circumstances as to why it was not declared right from the very start
01:08and not annotated in the marriage certificate.
01:12Pero pangatlo po, kahit po may pre-nup eh.
01:15Kasi po ang nakalagay dun sa kanyang sal-in,
01:18eh, director siya ng Metro City Chao.
01:23Nakalagay dun sa Metro City Chao na GIS
01:25at siya nag-deklara sa kanyang sal-in,
01:26nag-ari-ari-an niya yung Metro City Chao, number one.
01:29Number two, hindi pa rin ma-explain yung pera niya lang mismo,
01:33na bank account niya lang mismo,
01:34nakasama pati si Rodrigo Duterte.
01:36So hindi pa rin mag-a-add up po to zero
01:40just because ipresentan nila yung kanilang prenuptial agreement.
01:45So assuming without conceding that that prenuptial agreement will be valid
01:49or to begin with exists,
01:51marami pa rin mga kailangang sagutin itong si Sarah Duterte.
01:57In fact, tinamong sabi niya nga sa statement niya,
01:59very pregnant yun eh.
02:00Ibig nyo ba sabihin,
02:01bawal mag-negosyo with China?
02:04Di ba?
02:04Siya naman nagsabi dun eh.
02:06Yun yung pinalalabasin nyo,
02:07bawal mag-negosyo with China.
02:08Number one,
02:09yes po madam,
02:10bawal po kasi vice president kayo
02:12hindi naman kayo negosyante.
02:14At pangalawa,
02:15that is again an admission,
02:17pregnant admission,
02:18na hindi nag-negosyo sila mag-asawa with China
02:20at alam niya.
02:23So even if the prenuptial agreement would be presented,
02:27again, just to conclude,
02:29una, questionable ito,
02:31yung circumstance nito,
02:32the probative value is really very weak.
02:35And number three,
02:37it still does not answer
02:38a lot of the pieces of evidence
02:40presented by the prosecution.
02:42Attorney,
02:42kung hindi pwedeng magamit
02:44para makaligtas si BP Sara sa pre-nup,
02:47so ang pwedeng makagamit ng pre-nup
02:49ay si Attorney Manasa Scarpio
02:51para makaligtas yung kanyang property.
02:54Nakupo,
02:55hindi rin naman lingit sa ating mga kalaman
02:57na pwede namang strategiya
02:59ng mga Duterte,
03:00yung laglagan na.
03:01So ilalaglag na nila na si Mons lang yan.
03:05Si Mons lang yung nag-negosyo yung China.
03:07Si Mons lang lahat,
03:08yung mga nag-launder ng money.
03:10Si Mons lang lahat,
03:12God save the queen na siguro ito.
03:14Kung ilalaglag lang nila na si
03:16Attorney Manasa Scarpio lang,
03:18at least based on the pieces of evidence
03:20that we know so far.
03:22Pero again,
03:24it does not exculpate Sara Duterte.
03:27These are things that she knows,
03:29she ought to know,
03:31and based on the pieces of evidence
03:33she submitted herself
03:34and her declarations,
03:36marami doon incriminating
03:38na kahit na may pre-nup,
03:39hindi sila exculpated pareho.
03:43Dagdagan ko lang na maikse
03:45yung tanong ni Christian
03:46doon sa sinagot ni Attorney Dino.
03:48Kasi itong unexplained wealth na article,
03:51yung article 2.
03:53Meron pong mga subsections ito
03:56na nakasama doon sa aming allegation.
03:59Una, yung sinasabing unexplained wealth
04:01o hindi mapaliwanag na yaman.
04:04Pangalawa,
04:05yung non-divestment of our business
04:08and financial interest.
04:09Ito po'y klarong nakasaad
04:12sa ating saligang batas.
04:13Article 7, section 13,
04:15sinasabi na hindi pwedeng mag-engage
04:17any direct or indirect business
04:19ang ating pangalawang Pangulo.
04:22Pangatlo,
04:24itong non-truthful disclosure
04:28doon sa kanyang salen.
04:30Ito'y isang,
04:32ang salen ay batas.
04:33At nakalagay doon,
04:34dapat lahat ng iyong inilalagay dyan
04:37ay pinatutohanan mo.
04:39Kaya nga sinusumpaan ito.
04:41Kasi sinabi mo,
04:42wala kang cash in bank,
04:44sinabi mo,
04:45wala kang cash on hand,
04:47pero ang records
04:48na galing din sa'yo
04:50ay pinasisinungalingan
04:52yung sinabi mo doon sa'yo yung salen.
04:54So,
04:55these three,
04:56assuming for the sake of argument
04:58that that prenup really exists,
05:01it will only,
05:02it will not exculpate si BP Sara
05:06from being impeached.
05:09Yung property
05:11ang hinihiwalay
05:13malamang
05:13o yung assets
05:14ang nahihiwalay dito.
05:16Pero that is still
05:17a long story.
05:18Hindi pa rin yun.
05:19Kaya nga kanina sabi ko,
05:21dapat suriing mabuti
05:22yung dokumentong
05:23kanilang ipipresenta.
05:39Kaya nga kanina sabi ko,
