Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 hours ago
An art exhibition at Bikaner House in Delhi has triggered controversy after artist Rehan Vadra was asked to take down dozens of photographs documenting Delhi protests just hours before opening. Over seventy artworks were ordered removed after the administration cited the context and timing of events in India, deeming the pieces political in nature. Vadra stated that authorities issued an ultimatum to take down seventy-four artworks or face cancellation and sealing of the venue. Objections were also raised against displaying an Indian flag photograph, which was subsequently taken down. Describing the blanket removal of art as political bias and curtailing of freedom of expression, Vadra refused to abandon the remaining exhibition, maintaining that the visual documentation contained no derogatory or inflammatory content. While two rooms housing the disputed photographs were vacated, the rest of the show remains open, with plans underway to exhibit the removed collection elsewhere.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00So this young artist is from a prestigious political family.
00:04He's the son of Priyanka Gandhi Wajra and Robert Wajra.
00:07And he said that as a young artist I was going to exhibit some of my artwork
00:12but was asked to remove it because it had Delhi protests.
00:16Rehan Wajra speaking to India today over the exhibition controversy
00:18and saying the removal of the artwork is political bias.
00:21This happened at Beacon Airhouse.
00:23And that he was even asked to remove the photograph of the tricolor
00:26that he's not going to do.
00:27And he would rather take all the artwork and exhibit it somewhere else.
00:31And the objections happened.
00:32Belly hours to go before the show opened.
00:35Now there's not been a statement yet from the Beacon Airhouse
00:38but Priyanka Gandhi Wajra, the mother of Rehan,
00:41has spoken up saying she's extremely proud of him.
00:43And the ones who are in power need to realise that they're losing it.
00:47Let's listen in first to this exclusive conversation that Rehan has had
00:51with my colleague Rahul Gautam
00:53and what the Congress is saying about it.
01:05As an individual artist, as an upcoming photographer,
01:08how do you view this as an artist, you know, artistic point of view,
01:12you know, removing 70 to 80 percent of your collection
01:15which you're saying you've worked for almost three years?
01:18I feel, you know, it's basically, I was quite surprised.
01:22You know, I think any type of curtailing of art is wrong.
01:26I would understand if there's a, if, you know,
01:29if there is something that's a little too overtly political,
01:32that, you know, there are slogans being put
01:34or that, you know, there's graphic nudity in some artworks,
01:38that is understandable.
01:42But, you know, just blanket removing 75 photos
01:47because they may be objectionable to somebody does not work,
01:50you know, and it's wrong.
01:52Then you can't call yourself a cultural institution
01:55or you can't call yourself a stakeholder in the arts
01:58if you're going to curtail freedom of expression.
02:00Is it going to describe, you know,
02:02what really happened last afternoon?
02:05So, actually, my exhibition was,
02:09I was holding an exhibition for the first time
02:11after two, three years.
02:14And it wasn't just about the protests,
02:16but it was a, it was a exhibition of my body of works
02:20over the last, taken over the last three works,
02:23three years.
02:24The head of, who runs Beaconhead House,
02:27he came, the principal resident commissioner,
02:30and he gave me an explanation that because of the context
02:34and the timing of what is happening in India and in Delhi,
02:40that makes these works political in nature
02:42and therefore they're against the policy.
02:45So, I tried to argue that how can timing
02:50or outside context make artwork political
02:53and that's not in their policy.
02:54But anyways, they did not listen
02:58and I got a notice at around 3.30 p.m.
03:01saying that if you don't remove the artworks,
03:0374 artworks by 4 p.m.,
03:06you will have to,
03:07we will have to cancel the exhibition
03:09and seal the building.
03:10You are wanting me to take down
03:12a picture of the Indian flag.
03:14They never gave that to me in writing.
03:16They left one photo up.
03:17I went home to change for the opening.
03:21As soon as I left the premises,
03:22they went in and took it down
03:24and I have a video of them taking down
03:26that picture.
03:30Yeah, so that was the...
03:32And then, you know, we left the walls.
03:35And what is the way forward now?
03:37Has it been taken completely down?
03:39You're going to continue with it?
03:41You're going to look for any video?
03:43So, obviously, I had two flaws
03:45in the exhibition.
03:47And, you know, me and my team
03:48had worked quite hard
03:49to put it together.
03:51So I obviously didn't want to
03:53go down the route
03:55where they would cancel the entire show
03:56and we'd end up with showing nothing.
03:58So the two rooms that had
04:04allegedly objectionable images,
04:07those we have taken down.
04:09And the rest of the exhibition
04:11is continuing till Sunday.
04:12And those images I'm finding,
04:14I'm trying to find a place
04:16in Delhi where I can exhibit them.
04:18This exhibition, anyways,
04:20travels to Bangalore in December.
04:22So they'll be on view there.
04:24But I'm trying to find a place in Delhi
04:26that I can exhibit them
04:27in the next month or so.
04:29We're also awaiting a reaction
04:31and a statement from the Bikan Airhouse.
04:33And here's what Rehan Meanwhile is saying.
04:35He will not take down
04:37the Indian flag picture
04:38that I've clicked
04:39because there is nothing
04:40objectionable about it.
04:41He also maintained
04:42that none of his artwork,
04:43none of these photographs,
04:45contained derogatory
04:46or informatory content.
04:48Photographs were simply
04:49visual documentation.
04:5150% of the artwork
04:52was asked to be removed,
04:53primarily because it reflected
04:54certain parts of the protests.
04:56Ultimatum came just
04:57four and a half hours
04:59before the show was set to open.
05:01Now, according to him,
05:02the proposal was approved already,
05:04months in advance
05:05and have refused to remove
05:08the Tiranga photographs
05:09and then defiantly he maintains
05:11will display entire collection
05:13at another venue.
05:15Remember, Bikan Airhouse
05:16is an extremely
05:17and a prestigious popular place
05:19where a lot of these events,
05:20exhibitions and artwork
05:22that are exhibited,
05:23conclaves are organized as well.
05:24So what happened this time
05:25that led to this controversy?

Recommended