00:00Hi, the guys here really gave me grief because they thought that title was understandable.
00:05Or perhaps it was clear what he meant, but I maintain that we somewhat tarnished the broad
00:11and a very well-deserved tribute we paid to the great Nairo Quintana on the occasion of his farewell from
00:17the competitions this weekend with the headline of our interview with him in the
00:22The newspaper was printed precisely on the weekend. That headline said, and I wasn't left in the dark.
00:28I owed it to myself to win the Tour, I gave everything I had. And I agree that Nairo didn't finish in
00:35debt,
00:35Not at all, and I also agree that he gave everything he had, but since he didn't get to
00:41Never win the Tour, because I did feel like that title was missing a "no," because the debt would be,
00:47Yeah
00:48It's that I had some, for not winning the turn just for the sake of winning it. However much that might be understandable...
00:54What I meant confirms that it was a mistake not to use exact quotation marks from his words.
01:01but a construction of our own making. Nairo's exact words were, I didn't have to do the
01:08We're at peace with the idea of not winning the Tour. He did include not winning, and I think we should have.
01:15Include it in our paraphrase of his words. What do you think? Did you understand?
01:21Was that title good or not? The fact that it left no room for interpretation was an unforgivable mistake.
01:27Kevin Barraza caught us. And I say it's unforgivable because it was in a news report, one of those service reports.
01:35If they have the wrong information, then they cease to be [information] and, rather, they help to confuse.
01:42The topic was useful, as not many people know that merchants have specific hours in
01:50who can contact their databases by phone, so there are times when
01:56One should be able to answer calls from unknown numbers without fear of being overheard.
02:04Another offer for a new credit card. The problem is, as Kevin said in his pull of
02:10ears, the times we put in our story were those of the weekend and
02:16Not those from Monday to Friday, as we mentioned in the article. So, it's best not to say anything.
02:23The other was a strange shot that captured Jairo Alberto's at-the-fly @cs, which in two
02:28It's astonishing that the same verb appears incorrectly conjugated twice in the same edition.
02:35A little scary. But it happened to us last Monday, when the irregular verb "acrecentar"
02:42It played a trick on us, or rather, two tricks. In a Colombia Más 20 article about the reform
02:48In the subheading of the comprehensive rural development section, we stated that public works projects funded through taxes are fueling a debate.
02:55and further on in the sports section. It was in the title where we said that with the national team
03:02Lorenzo's doubts increase. No debates or doubts about that error. The verb "acrecentar" (to increase)
03:10It's conjugated like "to guess correctly." So the debate intensifies and the doubts increase. Nothing increases.
03:20Well, that's all. See you! Bye!
