Skip to playerSkip to main content
A group involving 1,476 people had been returned to Myanmar from Malaysia earlier this week, as part of a wider repatriation programme that could eventually involve up to 5,000 people. The Government of Malaysia says the returns are voluntary, however UNHCR has questioned whether people held in immigration detention can make a genuinely free and informed decision to return to a country still under ongoing conflict. On this episode of #ConsiderThis Melisa Idris speaks with Dr Moe Thuzar, Senior Fellow & Coordinator of the Myanmar Studies Programme at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I think on the part of Malaysia, of Kuala Lumpur, of course, you know, I'm not an expert on Malaysia
00:06domestic politics, so my apologies in advance.
00:09But I think, you know, looking at the kind of statements that are coming out, it really has to do
00:15with, I think, you know, there's the burden, the financial burden on services and the kind of anxieties that, you
00:24know, the people in Malaysia,
00:26in the areas where the Myanmar nationals may have been, have been raising.
00:31So I think there are those, you know, domestic calculations that have motivated such a decision at this point in
00:40time.
00:41You mentioned diplomatic isolation of the Myanmar junta. Can we talk a little bit about that?
00:46But the Prime Minister has said that he needs to engage the Myanmar junta leader, General Minang Lang, for an
00:55official visit in return to discuss the refugee issue.
01:00But what are your thoughts on that, Mo? Does that inadvertently legitimize, give legitimacy to the Myanmar junta?
01:08I think here, Melissa, we will need to kind of differentiate on nuance, the nature of bilateral engagements and interactions
01:18with the regional consensus regarding the Five Point consensus,
01:23which is linked to, of course, the Nebido, the leader level at Nebido, not being able to be, you know,
01:34attend the ASEAN summits in person, that restriction, because it only exists at that level anyway.
01:41When we talk about diplomatic isolation, sometimes it's a bit disingenuous because Myanmar is still a member of ASEAN.
01:49And representatives, officials from Myanmar, from Nebido, attend all sectors of ASEAN meetings at different levels.
01:56It is only at that summit and the foreign minister's level where the restriction applies.
02:01And that is directly linked to the lack of progress in implementing the Five Point consensus.
02:07So here, what I would like to, I think, emphasize is we need to differentiate between what goes on bilaterally,
02:12bilaterally, which is in pursuit of specific, either strategic, political or economic interests on the part of both sides.
02:21And of course, diplomatic interactions have not stopped.
02:25You know, there has to be no cutting of diplomatic ties with Nebido.
02:30So we need to, I think, recognize that.
02:32But at the regional level, nobody has said we do not agree with the regional consensus.
02:39If I recall, at the informal meeting of ASEAN foreign ministers in Bangkok,
02:44the foreign ministers actually reaffirmed the validity of the Five Point consensus
02:48in response to Nebido's statements rejecting the Five Point consensus.
02:53So I think there is that thing.
02:54Nobody is kind of going against the Five Point consensus, but everybody now seems to,
03:00well, not everybody, sorry, I should qualify myself.
03:03Well, several countries in this region are now making calculations based on the kind of specific interests
03:09that they have with regard to interactions with Nebido.
03:13And on the part of Nebido, of course, they are capitalizing on that to try and hack away
03:17at the, you know, the diplomatic space that they have and conflating, you know,
03:23those bilateral interactions with the regional requirement.
03:28Mo, if I understand you correctly, are you saying that Malaysia can still work with Myanmar
03:36to resolve any issues regarding the refugee issue or repatriation programs
03:41without having to engage the Myanmar junta leadership?
03:47Is that correct?
03:47Well, you see, engagement does not necessarily connote acceptance.
03:53And as I mentioned, nobody has cut diplomatic ties with Nebido.
03:57So engagement for specific purposes that are, you know, geared towards addressing,
04:05I guess, you know, the interests that different capitals may have,
04:10whether they are strategic, political or economic.
04:12I mean, that's going on.
04:13And of course, I think we are in this kind of situation where we look at, you know,
04:22Malaysia's decision, we look at how Kuala Lumpur has been, you know,
04:26one of the stronger voices upholding the regional principles since 2021.
04:32And if I look back at the Bangkok informal meeting, you know, that was held in June
04:39among the ASEAN foreign ministers meeting, the foreign minister from Nebido,
04:43the reaffirmation of the validity of the five-point consensus do point to this differentiation
04:49that try as they may, Nebido's efforts to kind of break into that ASEAN consensus level
04:58by leveraging the diplomatic or the, you know, the interaction space at the bilateral level
05:04may not be as, you know, clear-cut and binary as Nebido may be calculating.
05:09Mo, were you surprised that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had agreed to host General Minalang?
05:16I'm just wondering how this would play out within ASEAN.
05:21Could this arrangement affect Malaysia's standing within ASEAN,
05:24given how vocal Malaysia has been, how vocal Anwar Ibrahim has been about the Myanmar crisis?
05:30Well, I think here, of course, what, you know, people might be looking for is the kind of
05:37the nuancing and the thought that is paid to how the bilateral level interests
05:45and the regional level kind of centrality of, you know, ASEAN's decisions and credibility
05:54are going to be differentiated. So I think Prime Minister Anwar has also mentioned
06:00to solve certain problems that exist between two, you know, between, say, Malaysia and Myanmar,
06:07he kind of like needs to talk to the leader in Nebido. And of course, you know, that is what
06:14goes on bilaterally. But if, you know, that does not necessarily going, you know, that's not going
06:21to necessarily automatically translate into, oh, you know, open the door to ASEAN again.
06:27So I think that's how I think positions need to be nuanced. And I think as long as the regional
06:35consensus that, you know, future re-engagement with Nebido is contingent on seeing demonstrable
06:45progress in implementing the important priorities of the five-point consensus for most cessation
06:51of violence, also humanitarian assistance, you know, access without discrimination. These still
06:58need to be worked out because, as you know, the civil war in Myanmar is continuing, is intensifying
07:05and, of course, adding, I think, to those security and humanitarian concerns of the deportees,
07:10as I mentioned, is, you know, they probably may not be aware of what kind of security challenges
07:16and situation they're going into. Just days recently, you know, we've heard of air attacks
07:22on civilian targets, you know, a marketplace. And this is, you know, something that we all need
07:31to take into consideration when this discussion about, you know, does bilateral engagements
07:40automatically connote the regional principles being relaxed or not? I think we need to consider
07:47that in terms of what happens bilaterally and what holds regionally.
07:53Mo, thank you so much for being on the show with me. I appreciate your time. Dr. Mo Thuza
07:57there from the ASEAS Yusofi Shah Institute in Singapore. That wraps up this episode of Consider
08:01This. I'm Melissa Idris signing off for the evening. Thank you so much for watching and good
08:06night.
08:23Thank you so much for watching. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Recommended