Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 minutes ago
In an interview, Dr. Himanshu Rai, Director of the Indian Institute of Management Indore, addressed institutional protocols regarding caste harassment allegations and academic malpractice. He emphasized the distinction between internal inquiries and police probes under the SC/ST Act, stating, "The solidarity is absolutely legitimate. The prejudgment is not, and therefore, a faculty association is perfectly entitled to say that a colleague deserves due process." Discussing student discipline and tragic outcomes, he stated that an academic violation and a caste discrimination complaint must be assessed independently, noting that academic rules must be enforced regardless.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00We have Dr. Himanshu Rai, Director of the Indian Institute of Management at Indore.
00:05Himanshu, the faculty forum bagged an accused colleague within days, before any probe.
00:11When the family alleges caste harassment, does that kind of solidarity tell a Dalit student that the system is already
00:17on the other side?
00:20Actually, Maria, I don't think so, because we are trying to bring a binary over here.
00:28However, the solidarity is absolutely legitimate.
00:33The prejudgment is not.
00:34And therefore, a faculty association is perfectly entitled to say that a colleague deserves a due process and should not
00:43be presumed guilty.
00:45However, at the same time, while the investigation is still underway,
00:48if there is an unequivocal or a collective voice coming from the institution that creates an impression that conclusions have
00:58already been made,
01:00that may be detrimental to this entire concept of equality.
01:05And therefore, what I would say is that the due process belongs to both.
01:09It belongs to the professor so that there is a fair hearing and it also belongs to the students and
01:15the family that they get a proper hearing.
01:21Institutes investigate their deans and professors.
01:24For an SCST Act complaint, can that ever be called justice?
01:28Or do you think that there should be an outside panel which should be followed for ensuring the right process?
01:38Maria, we have to differentiate between two things.
01:40One is the institutional inquiry process and the other is a criminal investigation.
01:46In this case, what has happened is that one has been followed by the other.
01:50And therefore, these two things seem to be missed.
01:53You know, they're mixing up over here.
01:55The moment you have something that comes out, you know, first of all, it's an extremely unfortunate and a tragic
02:02incident.
02:03And my deepest condolences to the students' family.
02:05But the moment something of this sort happens, the first thing that is initiated is an internal inquiry,
02:12which is kind of a fact-finding mission.
02:15And once the fact-finding mission sees that there is certain substance,
02:19I think that is where you invite independent external members.
02:23However, in this case, it has become a police case because it has been transferred to the crime branch.
02:28There's an SCST Act, which is in place.
02:31And therefore, there is a statutory police investigation over here.
02:35So because there is a criminal case that has been registered over here,
02:41that ought not preclude the internal fact-finding.
02:45However, the internal fact-finding, I'm 100% sure, is not going to cloud or impact what the criminal investigation
02:54is going to say.
02:55And likewise, the proceedings of the criminal investigation are not going to actually impact the internal fact-finding.
03:00You see, internal fact-finding is not merely about looking at this particular case only.
03:06Internal fact-finding is also necessary because it can also evidence or bring out that,
03:11is there a systemic issue that needs to be addressed?
03:14Yes, I agree.
03:15So I think both are independent things.
03:18The largest sentiment of it being a systemic issue that has to be addressed.
03:22So let's look at the flip side of the argument.
03:25Does removing a student from an examination over a malpractice,
03:28because in this case, the allegation is that he used a smartphone and an AI to solve the question paper,
03:35really justify the charge of caste atrocity, even if the student has, you know, in this particular case,
03:43certainly tragically died by suicide?
03:47Not at all. Not at all.
03:51I think if a student is caught using unfair means, including AI, then in that case, it is not just
04:00the institute's, you know, responsibility.
04:06It's actually something that needs to be done any which way.
04:09Okay. So if a student was caught, the institute had both the right and the responsibility to make sure that
04:17it acted under its academic rule.
04:19Second, you know, you mentioned about the tragic death, and I agree that this is a tragic death.
04:23But a tragic death does not automatically, retrospectively, you know, transform an otherwise legitimate action into a vicious or a
04:33criminal one.
04:34However, at the same time, there was this academic violation does not preclude that there cannot be an independent caste
04:43allegation charge.
04:44So I think we have to look at these two separately and make sure that we are doing justice,
04:49because all three of them, all three scenarios can exist at the same time that the student was actually using
04:55certain means,
04:57which is completely unacceptable.
04:59Caste discrimination is unacceptable.
05:01And then convincing anybody that this happened or this did not happen or precluding other possibilities,
05:10that can also happen at the same time.
05:12So what we must ensure is that at this moment, we need to, first of all, assuage the feelings of
05:19the students and then make sure that we stick to the right path.
05:23One action cannot justify the other.
Comments

Recommended