Skip to playerSkip to main content
Curious about President Trump's claims that Korea is a "free-rider" when it comes to US military support? Dive into the real story behind US-Korea relations, defense costs, and those spicy alliance debates! Get the facts, the drama, and what's really at stake for both countries. Don't miss out—subscribe for more global insights and tell us in the comments what surprised you most! #politics #news #US #Korea #internationalrelations

👉 This channel was created in collaboration with https://www.youtube.com/@센서스튜디오

0:00 - President Trump's Claims That South Korea Is a Free-Rider
0:47 - Middle East Conflict and Korea's Response
1:46 - Implications of Korea's Non-Participation
2:30 - Korea's Defense Contributions and Alliance
3:43 - Korea's Role in Regional Security
4:19 - Korea's Industrial and Economic Importance
4:54 - US-Korea Alliance Challenges and Policy Shifts
6:37 - China's Strategic Interests in Korea-US Relations


Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00President Trump said that Korea is also a free rider country.
00:03In an interview with Fox News aired on August 31, President Trump claimed that when he asked
00:07if Korea could help a little, since there are 40,000 U.S. troops stationed in Korea,
00:11the Korean government refused, saying they'd rather not do it at all.
00:15Before we continue with President Trump's remarks, let me correct something.
00:18There are 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in Korea.
00:21The number of U.S. troops in Korea is not 40,000.
00:24President Trump said, regarding Korea's refusal, alright, thank you very much, but
00:28I will remember this," he reportedly said, seriously.
00:31He also argued that the United States can't keep helping countries that aren't willing
00:34to stand up for us like fools, and that if America reduces the costs it spends on the
00:38security of its allies, we will end up making a lot of money as a result.
00:41This shows a determination to closely scrutinize America's burden and the other countries'
00:45contribution within the alliance.
00:46It seems that the reason President Trump suddenly began strongly criticizing Korea is because,
00:51during the recent Middle East War, Korea did not respond to America's request for military
00:54support.
00:55In particular, President Trump, when the military conflict between Iran and the United States
00:59intensified last March, requested military support from Korea and other main allies to
01:03secure the safety of the Hormuz Strait.
01:05At that time, as concerns grew over the safety of navigation in the Hormuz Strait due to the
01:08conflict with Iran, the United States requested the participation of its allies, and publicly
01:12asked Korea to send a warship to join the escort operation.
01:15However, the Korean government chose not to participate militarily in response to the U.S.
01:18request, considering the security situation on the Korean peninsula and domestic procedures.
01:22Of course, from the Korean government's perspective, first of all, making a troop deployment request
01:26through Truth Social is not an official diplomatic document, and there was also the attitude that
01:30such an important decision as troop deployment cannot be made based on a post on social media.
01:34Above all, they requested the deployment of naval vessels, but with the current capabilities
01:37of the Shanghai unit, Korea cannot send them to the Strait of Hormuz or the Hormuz operation.
01:41That's right, because of this, Korea inevitably showed a stance of being unable to comply, but
01:45President Trump continued to pressure Korea regardless.
01:46After that, President Trump began to mention Korea's response several times.
01:49In particular, he expressed the perception that while the United States is stationing
01:53U.S. troops in Korea and providing military support for Korea's security, Korea did not
01:58actively cooperate when the United States needed it.
02:00But President Trump, this issue seems to go beyond whether Korea participated in military
02:04operations in the Middle East, and is serving as a standard for judging how much an ally
02:08is sharing the burden with the United States.
02:10In particular, this time, even though President Trump was not directly asked about Korea, he mentioned
02:14Korea as an example of a country that receives U.S. security support, but does not sufficiently
02:18help the U.S.
02:19Because of this, it is being seen as a stronger message than before.
02:22The fact that President Trump continues to mention that Korea did not participate in
02:25U.S. military operations can also be interpreted as meaning that this issue has not yet been
02:29resolved.
02:30But we also need to consider whether Korea is really just a country that only receives from
02:34the U.S.
02:34If you only look at President Trump's remarks, Korea might seem like a country that receives
02:38U.S. security support but does nothing when the U.S. needs help.
02:41However, the South Korea-U.S. alliance is not structured so that the U.S. unilaterally
02:45defends Korea while Korea bears no costs.
02:48Unlike Europe, Korea spends a significant amount on defense and it continues to maintain its
02:52own military power to respond to North Korea's nuclear and missile threats.
02:55Above all, Korea has actually dispatched troops to several overseas military operations led
02:59by the United States.
03:00Korea has participated in almost all of the troublesome wars.
03:03The Vietnam War, too.
03:04Korea also participated in the Gulf War, the Iraq War, and the Afghanistan War.
03:07Especially during this recent war in the Middle East, even though Korea didn't send troops
03:11directly, it played a major role by quickly supplying systems like Chong Gung to Middle
03:14Eastern countries helping to strengthen their defense capabilities.
03:17We didn't send troops to the Vietnam War or the Afghanistan War just to hear things
03:20like this.
03:21On top of that, Korea also provides various forms of support to help U.S. forces Korea
03:24maintain a stable presence here.
03:26Korea bears costs in maintaining facilities and infrastructure related to U.S. military bases
03:29in Korea and also shares part of the expenses related to the stationing of U.S. forces
03:33Korea through the Defense Cost Sharing Agreement.
03:34Therefore, just because the U.S. spends money on Korea's defense, there are many factors
03:38to consider before defining the entire Iraq U.S. alliance as a one-sided support relationship
03:42from the U.S.
03:43Even when the U.S. took away the TAFAD or Patriot missiles deployed in Korea at their
03:46own discretion, we didn't say much about it.
03:48But now, when people say that Korea is a free-riding country, there are quite a few things that
03:51feel unfair from Korea's perspective.
03:53Above all, the role of the Korean military itself is significant.
03:56Korea is a country that directly borders North Korea.
03:59Since Korea is the country most directly exposed to North Korea's military threat, the Korean
04:03military maintains a considerable number of troops and equipment.
04:06Although the United States is involved in the defense of the Korean Peninsula, the Korean
04:09military also plays a key role in the peninsula's defense capabilities.
04:12The United States supporting Korea and Korea maintaining its own defense capabilities are
04:15not separate issues but are both key elements that make up the ROK-U.S. alliance.
04:19Also, Korea matters to the United States for more than just military reasons.
04:22Korea has a considerable impact on America's industries and supply chains, such as semiconductors,
04:26shipbuilding, batteries, and automobiles.
04:28Especially as the United States continues its strategic competition with China, securing
04:32stable supply chains and advanced manufacturing capabilities has become more important, and
04:36Korea's industrial role is also growing.
04:38Therefore, what's important in this controversy is not just whether Korea refused the United
04:41States' request.
04:42We need to consider not only the security support the United States provides to Korea, the defense
04:46costs Korea bears on its own, and the support Korea provides for the stationing of U.S.
04:50forces in Korea, but also the industrial capabilities Korea can offer to the U.S. economy and security.
04:55Now once again, the South Korea-U.S. alliance is facing an important test.
04:57This is because President Trump's pressure is not limited to the military field, but
05:00is also raising issues about U.S. forces in Korea, defense costs, trade, and investment
05:04at the same time.
05:05In particular, recently the U.S. side's actions regarding the South Korea-U.S. joint military
05:08exercises have become more concrete.
05:10President Trump is known to have instructed the U.S. Department of Defense to significantly
05:13reduce the scale and schedule of this year's Ulchi Freedom Shield joint exercise.
05:16The South Korea-U.S. joint military exercises are key drills in which the two countries'
05:19forces check their actual operational capabilities in response to North Korea's nuclear and missile
05:23threats.
05:23So the fact that the U.S. President himself directly ordered a reduction is quite significant.
05:27It's already unusual that the exercise had started, and then an order came to cut it
05:30in half midway.
05:31Of course, President Trump has shown a negative view of the South Korea-U.S. joint military
05:34exercises in the past.
05:36Even during his time in office, he argued for reducing or suspending the joint exercises,
05:39citing the huge costs involved and the possibility of provoking North Korea.
05:41In fact, after the 2018 North Korea-U.S. summit, there is precedent for major South Korea-U.S.
05:46joint military exercises were either suspended or scaled down one after another.
05:49This time as well, since President Trump is once again mentioning the cost of joint exercises
05:52and the issue of provoking North Korea, there is a possibility that a policy stance similar
05:55to that period could reemerge.
05:57On top of that, recently President Trump even made remarks emphasizing his relationship
05:59with Kim Jong-un, so there is growing interest in how the direction of the U.S. policy toward
06:02North Korea and South Korea-U.S. military cooperation might change.
06:05In addition, the issue of U.S. troops stationed in South Korea is also a major variable.
06:08Politicom reported that the U.S. Department of Defense is considering a plan to reduce
06:11about 4,500 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea and relocate them to other areas in the
06:15Indo-Pacific region.
06:16However, this is still just a plan under review and an actual reduction has not been decided
06:19yet.
06:20Since there are quite a few negative opinions about reducing U.S. troops in South Korea
06:22even in the U.S. Congress, several procedures and discussions will be necessary before it
06:25is finalized as an actual policy.
06:27Nevertheless, the fact that the size of U.S. troops in South Korea is once again being reviewed
06:30as part of U.S. domestic policy is something that South Korea needs to watch very carefully.
06:34If President Trump keeps making demands, the strength of U.S. forces in South Korea could
06:37continue to weaken.
06:38Also, President Trump has shown that he does not treat the issue of U.S. troops in South
06:41Korea separately from trade negotiations.
06:43Even during last year's Korea-U.S. trade negotiations, he argued that South Korea was
06:46free-riding on U.S. military power and brought up security issues together.
06:49Recently, South Korea's investment plans in the U.S. have also remained an important
06:52issue in negotiations between the two countries.
06:54Out of the amount South Korea promised, $150 billion was allocated for cooperation in the
06:57shipbuilding industry, but it is reported that specific investment plans for the
07:00remaining $200 billion have not yet been finalized.
07:02With growing U.S. dissatisfaction over this investment issue, the possibility that negotiations
07:06in the security and economic sectors will influence each other is increasing.
07:08For this reason, what we need to pay attention to in the future of Korea-U.S. relations is
07:11not whether each issue moves separately.
07:13The point is that issues such as defense cost sharing, the operation of U.S. forces in Korea,
07:17joint training, investment in the U.S., and trade issues may be brought to the negotiating
07:20table in an interconnected manner.
07:21Since President Trump is evaluating South Korea's security and economic contributions together,
07:25the South Korean government also needs to establish a negotiation strategy within
07:28the overall structure of Korea-U.S. relations rather than responding to each issue separately.
07:31Quite troublesome situation for South Korea, and it's highly likely that China will also
07:35closely watch the changes in Korea-U.S. relations.
07:37Growing conflicts between Korea and the U.S. are an important diplomatic and security variable
07:40for China as well.
07:41The United States has continued its strategic competition with China while strengthening
07:44cooperation with its allies such as South Korea, Japan, and Australia.
07:47In particular, since South Korea is geographically close to China, while maintaining a strong
07:51military alliance with the United States, the direction of Korea-U.S. relations can also
07:54affect China's East Asia strategy.
07:56However, in this situation, if South Korea and the United States are seen bickering with
08:00each other, it would be truly beneficial for China.
08:02Even if China does nothing, its influence is growing.
08:04From China's perspective, the important thing is to what extent South Korea will maintain
08:07security cooperation with the United States.
08:09If South Korea strengthens its military cooperation with the United States, China will have to consider
08:13the growing strategic influence of the U.S. around the Korean Peninsula and the Yellow
08:17Sea.
08:17On the other hand, if South Korea and the U.S. continue to clash over defense costs or
08:20military roles, China can pay attention to the possibility that South Korea's diplomatic
08:24options will expand.
08:25Especially if the political gap between the United States and South Korea widens, China
08:29may take steps to improve diplomatic relations with South Korea or expand cooperation.
08:33Perhaps China might just quietly observe the situation.

Recommended